Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

Yes, Amber Heard has set women back by divorcing, publishing her perspective, and not agreeing with the narrative of her violent ex-husband. Whelp.

You’re a mess, honey. Man are you going to struggle when this trial ends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

Yes, Amber Heard has set women back by divorcing, publishing her perspective, and not agreeing with the narrative of her violent ex-husband. Whelp.

You’re a mess, honey. Man are you going to struggle when this trial ends.

You are making assumptions, honey. I think both AH and JD are barely sane. I think everyone on both sides are cherry picking whatever "facts" suit their preferred narratives. I don't think JD wins this. But right now he seems to have the upper hand solely, imo, based on Camille Vasquez's impressive questioning of AH. That seems to have tipped so many people into the JD camp. I hadn't paid attention to any of it, but saw the headlines about CV. I find her extremely impressive, especially in contrast with the other attorneys so far.

More to the point of my initial post, I simply don't understand your vitriolic diatribe against most everything anyone has to say. If you're triggered, then I'm sorry for whatever happened to you. But it feels a bit as if you simply are trolling because you're bored and want to fight with someone.

Either way, I stand by assessment that AH did not help women's empowerment (which she purported to be doing with the article) when she in fact was actively involved in their disturbing relationship.

[Anonymous]

Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

Yes, Amber Heard has set women back by divorcing, publishing her perspective, and not agreeing with the narrative of her violent ex-husband. Whelp.

You’re a mess, honey. Man are you going to struggle when this trial ends.

You are making assumptions, honey. I think both AH and JD are barely sane. I think everyone on both sides are cherry picking whatever "facts" suit their preferred narratives. I don't think JD wins this. But right now he seems to have the upper hand solely, imo, based on Camille Vasquez's impressive questioning of AH. That seems to have tipped so many people into the JD camp. I hadn't paid attention to any of it, but saw the headlines about CV. I find her extremely impressive, especially in contrast with the other attorneys so far.

More to the point of my initial post, I simply don't understand your vitriolic diatribe against most everything anyone has to say. If you're triggered, then I'm sorry for whatever happened to you. But it feels a bit as if you simply are trolling because you're bored and want to fight with someone.

Either way, I stand by assessment that AH did not help women's empowerment (which she purported to be doing with the article) when she in fact was actively involved in their disturbing relationship.

+1

I think most people share your view. The nut your responding to has to be a troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

+1000

They are also undercutting women's empowerment by implying or speculating that women don't have independent brains to analyze this case without taking sides based solely on gender. "Pro AH psycho" seems so angry and unhinged like AH. Makes me a little suspicious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

Yes, Amber Heard has set women back by divorcing, publishing her perspective, and not agreeing with the narrative of her violent ex-husband. Whelp.

You’re a mess, honey. Man are you going to struggle when this trial ends.

You are making assumptions, honey. I think both AH and JD are barely sane. I think everyone on both sides are cherry picking whatever "facts" suit their preferred narratives. I don't think JD wins this. But right now he seems to have the upper hand solely, imo, based on Camille Vasquez's impressive questioning of AH. That seems to have tipped so many people into the JD camp. I hadn't paid attention to any of it, but saw the headlines about CV. I find her extremely impressive, especially in contrast with the other attorneys so far.

More to the point of my initial post, I simply don't understand your vitriolic diatribe against most everything anyone has to say. If you're triggered, then I'm sorry for whatever happened to you. But it feels a bit as if you simply are trolling because you're bored and want to fight with someone.

Either way, I stand by assessment that AH did not help women's empowerment (which she purported to be doing with the article) when she in fact was actively involved in their disturbing relationship.

Lol. You and your +1 above are real trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

+1000

They are also undercutting women's empowerment by implying or speculating that women don't have independent brains to analyze this case without taking sides based solely on gender. "Pro AH psycho" seems so angry and unhinged like AH. Makes me a little suspicious.

I have been outed! Yes, its Amber!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pro AH psycho is acting a lot like AH herself. Both are undercutting women's empowerment by acting like, well, psychos.

Yes, Amber Heard has set women back by divorcing, publishing her perspective, and not agreeing with the narrative of her violent ex-husband. Whelp.

You’re a mess, honey. Man are you going to struggle when this trial ends.

Sounds like YOU are the one who is going to struggle when this trial ends... You'll need a new place to channel all your hatefulness toward random message board posters.

You've responded to multiple people with this same claim now. Everyone who responds to you is stupid, an asshole and is going to just lose their shit when the trial is over and he loses. I'm pretty sure no one is as invested in the trial as you are, given all the hysterics directed toward anyone whose opinion is different than your own. Moving on now...not going to provoke your emotional instability any further....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

I believe he lost roles. The me too movement doesn’t allow studios to give actors a chance. They are guilty and move on with the next guy. I believe him. He was honest about his alcohol and drug use so no surprise there. Ellen Barkin was an angry jilted lover and Amber’s sister is sticking up for her sister. He is going to win this trial and hopefully work again. She is just not believable. She lies too much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

I believe he lost roles. The me too movement doesn’t allow studios to give actors a chance. They are guilty and move on with the next guy. I believe him. He was honest about his alcohol and drug use so no surprise there. Ellen Barkin was an angry jilted lover and Amber’s sister is sticking up for her sister. He is going to win this trial and hopefully work again. She is just not believable. She lies too much.

Holy crow. At least you’re honest, online at least. I hope you’re open with your views so people can keep their distance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today went very badly for Depp.

https://deadline.com/2022/05/johnny-depps-ex-uta-agent-reveals-actors-cash-strapped-woes-at-50-million-defamation-trial-1235028164/

+1 I have a bridge to sell anyone who thinks Depp lost roles because of Heard and not because of substance abuse and unbearably unprofessional behavior that became too expensive for movie studios.

I believe he lost roles. The me too movement doesn’t allow studios to give actors a chance. They are guilty and move on with the next guy. I believe him. He was honest about his alcohol and drug use so no surprise there. Ellen Barkin was an angry jilted lover and Amber’s sister is sticking up for her sister. He is going to win this trial and hopefully work again. She is just not believable. She lies too much.

DP. That’s right, all of the women are lying whores with a grudge against this poor, innocent man who did nothing but exist. This misogynistic trope is very old, and very transparent.

[Anonymous]

Today was packed with details, albeit dense. Heard team maintains their professional composure. Dank Depp team not so much. Still yuckin' it up, laughing and blatantly mocking those on the stand and virtually deposed. Ellen Barkin’s deposition is consistent with accusations of a drug and alcohol riddled Depp who was controlling, jealous, threw a bottle of wine at his guests. Never hit or physically threatened her. Former psychiatrist narrated his notes from 2014 or 2016 and confirmed Depp referred to “the devil” inside of him. Former talent agent said the reason he’s not getting roles or Pirates 6 is because crews are sick of him. She said people talk, actors have a reputation and Depp is known for chronic lateness, no show, drunk, high or both, needs an earpiece so his lines can be fed to him. One top exec said we can deal with those things but not domestic violence. Depp’s former best friend and fellow musician revealed being called to an emergency situation in which the dwelling or airstream was ransacked and saw bruises on AH. AH retained a postnup attorney. Depp telephoned the attorney, called her a b'tch etc. So many details over weeks of testimony consistently support that Depp physically abused AH multiple times. Added to that is he was found guilty of abuse in the UK case. It’s insane the hoops of fire AH must jump through. He will lose this defamation case. She will counter sue. He will settle if he has any money left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

A standard you don’t hold Johnny Depp to