Tell me what we can do about the guns

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honestly have all the guns you want. I don’t care if everyone is armed. What I do care about is whether you fire the gun. If you fire a gun in a populated area, you should be locked up perhaps forever. There is no excuse for risking human life and making everyone else less safe, and there is no room in our society for people who fire a weapon when others are around. Hunting is fine, and true self defense, but anything else we should lock people up and throw away the key.

That’s how I feel about people who speed excessively or those with deadly, highly contagious diseases who go out in public without proper protections or those that sell cigarettes or high fat and sugar food.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I give money to the Moms Demand Actio group. What else can we do?

Vote Democrat and make your views known to your elected leaders.

[Anonymous]

Vote for prosecutors who still believe in prosecuting criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly have all the guns you want. I don’t care if everyone is armed. What I do care about is whether you fire the gun. If you fire a gun in a populated area, you should be locked up perhaps forever. There is no excuse for risking human life and making everyone else less safe, and there is no room in our society for people who fire a weapon when others are around. Hunting is fine, and true self defense, but anything else we should lock people up and throw away the key.

That’s how I feel about people who speed excessively or those with deadly, highly contagious diseases who go out in public without proper protections or those that sell cigarettes or high fat and sugar food.

Other people’s fat and sugar endanger you? Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no “right” for every person to have any gun at any time. The second amendment is pretty clearly about militias and the deranged Supreme Court precedent that put us on this path should be overturned.

No it isn't. Read the Miller decision that put this thinking in play. The person convicted was not part of a militia. However, the Supreme Court did not say that is the conclusion of the case. They analyzed the particular gun used and said it had no military purpose. The militia was used as a term separate from National Guard.

The “militia” in the Constitution refers to the able bodied men of the community, who were expected to be ready to appear for service, fully armed with their own weapons, ammunition and equipment, when called up to do so. The weapons they were expected to bring with them specifically were “weapons of war.” Hence, the very reference to the militia entails individual possession of firearms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't particularly care how many successful cases of "defensive gun use" there are because *I* (and in my opinion no normal person) will ever "defensively" use a gun. So why should I care?

Probably 2/3 of Americans own guns. who cares what you would do. i don't care if you have a fire extinguisher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are wrong about the biggest issues of our time .

they are wrong about guns - the US death toll is evidence.

Way more crimes are prevented with firearms than committed with them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly have all the guns you want. I don’t care if everyone is armed. What I do care about is whether you fire the gun. If you fire a gun in a populated area, you should be locked up perhaps forever. There is no excuse for risking human life and making everyone else less safe, and there is no room in our society for people who fire a weapon when others are around. Hunting is fine, and true self defense, but anything else we should lock people up and throw away the key.

That’s how I feel about people who speed excessively or those with deadly, highly contagious diseases who go out in public without proper protections or those that sell cigarettes or high fat and sugar food.

Other people’s fat and sugar endanger you? Please.

We’re talking about death dumb ass and that stuff kills more than guns do every year. Worse it increases health care costs. At least when you’re shot and killed the health care costs cease.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly have all the guns you want. I don’t care if everyone is armed. What I do care about is whether you fire the gun. If you fire a gun in a populated area, you should be locked up perhaps forever. There is no excuse for risking human life and making everyone else less safe, and there is no room in our society for people who fire a weapon when others are around. Hunting is fine, and true self defense, but anything else we should lock people up and throw away the key.

That’s how I feel about people who speed excessively or those with deadly, highly contagious diseases who go out in public without proper protections or those that sell cigarettes or high fat and sugar food.

Other people’s fat and sugar endanger you? Please.

We’re talking about death dumb ass and that stuff kills more than guns do every year. Worse it increases health care costs. At least when you’re shot and killed the health care costs cease.

Name calling is so puerile. The subject of this thread is firearms. Go start your own thread if you want to talk about controlling other people’s diets.

And if you think that health care “costs” have anything to do with actual risk, you’re the dumb ass. Your insurance and copays cost what they do because of profit motives (even in ostensible nonprofits), high salaries for personnel and executives, dividends and share price increases for corporate stockholders, and because the very existence of health insurance raises costs to consumers. Do you honestly believe that if outlays went down everybody would charge less?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I give money to the Moms Demand Actio group. What else can we do?

Vote Democrat and make your views known to your elected leaders.

But democrats keep saying they’re not trying to take anyone’s guns away.

But you tell people they should vote democrat so the democrats will take guns away.



Y’all are morons. You can’t even get your messaging straight, and you end up looking like the obvious liars you are.


Well done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly have all the guns you want. I don’t care if everyone is armed. What I do care about is whether you fire the gun. If you fire a gun in a populated area, you should be locked up perhaps forever. There is no excuse for risking human life and making everyone else less safe, and there is no room in our society for people who fire a weapon when others are around. Hunting is fine, and true self defense, but anything else we should lock people up and throw away the key.

That’s how I feel about people who speed excessively or those with deadly, highly contagious diseases who go out in public without proper protections or those that sell cigarettes or high fat and sugar food.

Other people’s fat and sugar endanger you? Please.

We’re talking about death dumb ass and that stuff kills more than guns do every year. Worse it increases health care costs. At least when you’re shot and killed the health care costs cease.

Name calling is so puerile. The subject of this thread is firearms. Go start your own thread if you want to talk about controlling other people’s diets.

And if you think that health care “costs” have anything to do with actual risk, you’re the dumb ass. Your insurance and copays cost what they do because of profit motives (even in ostensible nonprofits), high salaries for personnel and executives, dividends and share price increases for corporate stockholders, and because the very existence of health insurance raises costs to consumers. Do you honestly believe that if outlays went down everybody would charge less?

Typical gun grabber.

“Name calling is so puerile” …. then calls names.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are wrong about the biggest issues of our time .

they are wrong about guns - the US death toll is evidence.

Way more crimes are prevented with firearms than committed with them

They’re not interested in stopping crimes. They’re only interested in taking away guns from people who aren’t criminals to begin with.

[Anonymous]

This story is just maddening:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/interactive/2021/dc-kids-shooting-victims-guns/

While I'm ranting, highly recommend John Woodrow Cox's recent book on gun violence, Children Under Fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are wrong about the biggest issues of our time .

they are wrong about guns - the US death toll is evidence.

Way more crimes are prevented with firearms than committed with them

They’re not interested in stopping crimes. They’re only interested in taking away guns from people who aren’t criminals to begin with.

+1. Take the guns, defund the police, pay people to not work and instead sit idle all day, and then wonder why violent crime escalates. Talk about low IQ.

[Anonymous]

Prosecute for gun crimes. most DC offenders are DC offenders whose charges were reduced or dropped. Seems simple,.no?