Yes, and agency model needs to be revised. Either way, you need to pay more than you are paying today. |
What people are telling you is that just because agency sets a minimum it doesn’t absolve you morally or in terms of the future legislation to pay the bare minimum. |
Say what you will, but I literally saw a family posting this fall looking for a ski and surf buddy for their kids. The family splits time between DC, San Diego and Vail. They wanted an au pair who could surf and ski to essentially keep their teens from doing anything reckless. |
Of course. That’s not the question. I spent my entire childhood with ski instructors as glorified babysitters and my child is getting the same. The issue is whether the family is paying $4/hr. No? Precisely. |
Teens need an au pair? WTF???? |
They may well at 13, 14, and 15 depending on the school commute. |
About half of the biglaw partners with second homes in places like Aspen that I personally know had au pairs (the other half nannies). I have no idea if they pay above market to their au pairs or not. |
Somebody better tell OP’s au pair! It’s a win win: she gets a better gig and poor OP is rescued from extortion. And rightly so since the OP already of her own free will pays the whole 0.11 cents per hour extra |
Biglaw partner here paying minimum wage plus education stipend plus perks and have a very well paid cleaner too. The au pair is not washing my knickers in Aspen in the Ajax mountain driven snow for $4.35/hr. Just because we earn well doesn’t mean we get to be pitiful humans. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. |
Yes, I know a local au pair who works 10 hours a week driving a 15 yo back and forth to her competitive gymnastics lessons. |
Yes. That’s more like what the program is meant to be. Not a domestic servant. How is this such a shock to our fellow DMV moms with concerning human trafficker tendencies?! |
That's all very lovely, and I too pay over stipend ($10/hr in MD), but my point was simply that yes, very wealthy DC-area families have au pairs, and even you paying minimum wage are still paying a fairly small stipend. |
Agreed. Which is precisely the point missed by the OP & Co. Who kicked off a massive thread using the word extortion to avoid paying more than $4.46 per hour! They are willing to pay more in fact IF the au pair would do more work (patently prohibited under the State Dpt rules). What is not prohibited is the au pair negotiating for more. Yet. There’s a cabal of moms disparaging the au pair and literally writing scripts on how to intimidate the au pair into NOT being able to negotiate which is HER RIGHT. That is what’s so awful. |
It's sad that people are trying to destroy this program which has worked well for all involved for so long under the guise of social justice. Reminds me of the tipping bill that failed in DC, which would have hurt a lot of servers. |
And who meanwhile are happy to send their kids to daycares where workers get paid only a fraction more without any of the other benefits. |