new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

We know you don’t believe women. You don’t believe them when they report at the time, you don’t believe them if they wait, you don’t believe the if they need time to process their assault, you don’t believe them if they understand and name their assaulted right away. You don’t believe women. We know.

You do know that the authors--in their book--have said that the woman Stiers names denies the event.
Do you believe her?

Please! Quit injecting facts into the liberal fantasy!! Facts have no place here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't read any of those twitter feeds but can tell you that I'm a voter who's beyond tired of the "remembered accusations" all these years later and the attempts to cast those of us who don't buy it all as misogynists and worse. It is not the way to win the presidency back from Trump.

We know you don’t believe women. You don’t believe them when they report at the time, you don’t believe them if they wait, you don’t believe the if they need time to process their assault, you don’t believe them if they understand and name their assaulted right away. You don’t believe women. We know.

Actually, they are believed, just not all of the time. The Duke lacrosse accuser WAS believed. Look what happened there.

[Anonymous]

Well Trump's avid supporters have managed to derail yet another thread by insisting that their boy couldn't possibly be a predator - no not their boy!

I can't even recall now - were we talking about Bart O'Beer this time, or Roy Moore, or Donald Trump. Who can even remember anymore! So many white Republican men, so many credible sexual predation accusations.

Then their supporters take to the internet with the same talking points every time. They seem to think that if they can take over a thread that means they've won the argument.

Anyway, per usual this thread has turned into a cesspool of Trump supporters saying the same stupid things as they've said every time one of their very fine boys gets accused of rape, or molesting underaged girls, or shoving their ccks into a woman's face at a college party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well Trump's avid supporters have managed to derail yet another thread by insisting that their boy couldn't possibly be a predator - no not their boy!

I can't even recall now - were we talking about Bart O'Beer this time, or Roy Moore, or Donald Trump. Who can even remember anymore! So many white Republican men, so many credible sexual predation accusations.

Then their supporters take to the internet with the same talking points every time. They seem to think that if they can take over a thread that means they've won the argument.

Anyway, per usual this thread has turned into a cesspool of Trump supporters saying the same stupid things as they've said every time one of their very fine boys gets accused of rape, or molesting underaged girls, or shoving their ccks into a woman's face at a college party.

We know. We know. You hate it when people counter your arguments with, you know, actual facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well Trump's avid supporters have managed to derail yet another thread by insisting that their boy couldn't possibly be a predator - no not their boy!

I can't even recall now - were we talking about Bart O'Beer this time, or Roy Moore, or Donald Trump. Who can even remember anymore! So many white Republican men, so many credible sexual predation accusations.

Then their supporters take to the internet with the same talking points every time. They seem to think that if they can take over a thread that means they've won the argument.

Anyway, per usual this thread has turned into a cesspool of Trump supporters saying the same stupid things as they've said every time one of their very fine boys gets accused of rape, or molesting underaged girls, or shoving their ccks into a woman's face at a college party.

I'm one of the previous posters who is not a Trump supporter and wouldn't vote for Roy Moore if he were the only candidate in the universe. It's a mistake to generalize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well Trump's avid supporters have managed to derail yet another thread by insisting that their boy couldn't possibly be a predator - no not their boy!

I can't even recall now - were we talking about Bart O'Beer this time, or Roy Moore, or Donald Trump. Who can even remember anymore! So many white Republican men, so many credible sexual predation accusations.

Then their supporters take to the internet with the same talking points every time. They seem to think that if they can take over a thread that means they've won the argument.

Anyway, per usual this thread has turned into a cesspool of Trump supporters saying the same stupid things as they've said every time one of their very fine boys gets accused of rape, or molesting underaged girls, or shoving their ccks into a woman's face at a college party.

I'm one of the previous posters who is not a Trump supporter and wouldn't vote for Roy Moore if he were the only candidate in the universe. It's a mistake to generalize.

Meh. You still put him in office. You can take some credit for this increased misogyny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well Trump's avid supporters have managed to derail yet another thread by insisting that their boy couldn't possibly be a predator - no not their boy!

I can't even recall now - were we talking about Bart O'Beer this time, or Roy Moore, or Donald Trump. Who can even remember anymore! So many white Republican men, so many credible sexual predation accusations.

Then their supporters take to the internet with the same talking points every time. They seem to think that if they can take over a thread that means they've won the argument.

Anyway, per usual this thread has turned into a cesspool of Trump supporters saying the same stupid things as they've said every time one of their very fine boys gets accused of rape, or molesting underaged girls, or shoving their ccks into a woman's face at a college party.

I'm one of the previous posters who is not a Trump supporter and wouldn't vote for Roy Moore if he were the only candidate in the universe. It's a mistake to generalize.

Meh. You still put him in office. You can take some credit for this increased misogyny.

DP.
Get over yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well Trump's avid supporters have managed to derail yet another thread by insisting that their boy couldn't possibly be a predator - no not their boy!

I can't even recall now - were we talking about Bart O'Beer this time, or Roy Moore, or Donald Trump. Who can even remember anymore! So many white Republican men, so many credible sexual predation accusations.

Then their supporters take to the internet with the same talking points every time. They seem to think that if they can take over a thread that means they've won the argument.

Anyway, per usual this thread has turned into a cesspool of Trump supporters saying the same stupid things as they've said every time one of their very fine boys gets accused of rape, or molesting underaged girls, or shoving their ccks into a woman's face at a college party.

I'm one of the previous posters who is not a Trump supporter and wouldn't vote for Roy Moore if he were the only candidate in the universe. It's a mistake to generalize.

Meh. You still put him in office. You can take some credit for this increased misogyny.

Meh yourself. I didn't put him in office.

[Anonymous]

Full disclosure: I loath Brett, I'm voting for Senator Warren.

I was in a sorority at a fairly selective university -- none of this is shocking. I witnessed much worse by drunk boys, student-athletes, rich boys and mean girls. I'm over it. This just sounds like an insecure gal who used affirmative action to get into an elite college she didn't have the academics chops for, realized very quickly she was in the bottom decile, so she always felt like an outsider. Her professional life is a disappointment. Yale was supposed to be her ticket to the elite. It wasn't. She's angry now, she's been seething since welcome week of freshman year. Proximity to power in the 80s is her ticket to fame, her ticket to cash in in 2019. Our media has become gross. I can't even watch TV or listen to NPR anymore. Just classical music now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't read any of those twitter feeds but can tell you that I'm a voter who's beyond tired of the "remembered accusations" all these years later and the attempts to cast those of us who don't buy it all as misogynists and worse. It is not the way to win the presidency back from Trump.

We know you don’t believe women. You don’t believe them when they report at the time, you don’t believe them if they wait, you don’t believe the if they need time to process their assault, you don’t believe them if they understand and name their assaulted right away. You don’t believe women. We know.

If you want to see Trump improve his chances for remaining in office, keep going with this tack all the way up to the next presidential election.

Keep going. The Gross Old Perverts are doing amazing with all ages, races and education levels of women, just amazing and none of them are peeling off as you ridicule and shame victims.

Brett Kavanaugh was and is unfit for the bench. He’s a cheap, tawdry little man bathed in his own flop sweat and beholden to some secretive deep pocketed people.

Yet he is on SCOTUS and you are what?

Giggle

Outraged. Like every true American.

[Anonymous]

Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Was his mortgage paid off free and clear or are you making that part up to exaggerate the couple hundred grand of debt he paid off? Did he just re-fi the house or pull equity out? Did he just get an advance on his inheritance to clear off the revolving debt?

I'm not an elite like him and I have plenty of 50-something friends who stand to or have inherited $400k 500k $2m even $5m.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't read any of those twitter feeds but can tell you that I'm a voter who's beyond tired of the "remembered accusations" all these years later and the attempts to cast those of us who don't buy it all as misogynists and worse. It is not the way to win the presidency back from Trump.

We know you don’t believe women. You don’t believe them when they report at the time, you don’t believe them if they wait, you don’t believe the if they need time to process their assault, you don’t believe them if they understand and name their assaulted right away. You don’t believe women. We know.

Listen, Dr. Seuss. We get that you believe women are never, EVER to be doubted. That’s your prerogative. But don’t tell the rest of us who we should and shouldn’t believe, purely by virtue of their gender. Pretty sexist, in fact.
- a woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't read any of those twitter feeds but can tell you that I'm a voter who's beyond tired of the "remembered accusations" all these years later and the attempts to cast those of us who don't buy it all as misogynists and worse. It is not the way to win the presidency back from Trump.

We know you don’t believe women. You don’t believe them when they report at the time, you don’t believe them if they wait, you don’t believe the if they need time to process their assault, you don’t believe them if they understand and name their assaulted right away. You don’t believe women. We know.

Listen, Dr. Seuss. We get that you believe women are never, EVER to be doubted. That’s your prerogative. But don’t tell the rest of us who we should and shouldn’t believe, purely by virtue of their gender. Pretty sexist, in fact.
- a woman

+100