new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

If there were something there, we would have heard. Dems would have leaked it.

[Anonymous]

Sen. Grassley Press
@GrassleyPress
.
@NYTimes
did not contacted Sen. Grassley’s office for this story. If they had, we would've reminded them of a few key public facts they omitted:

1.
@senjudiciary
staff proactively contacted Ms. Ramirez' lawyers soon after the New Yorker story broke.
https://nyti.ms/30g2Nbr

2. Despite 7 attempts by staff, Ms. Ramirez' lawyers declined to provide documentary evidence referenced in the article/witness accounts to support the claims. They also declined invitations for Ms. Ramirez to speak with committee investigators or to provide a written statement.

3. Nonetheless, our investigators spoke to and reviewed material from several Yale classmates of Ms. Ramirez and Justice Kavanaugh in order to assess the claim. You can read the committee’s 414-page investigative summary here:
http://bit.ly/30nwLKG

4. The committee's review found no verifiable evidence to support the claims. The
@nytimes
' own reporting at the time noted that it couldn't find anyone with firsthand knowledge & that Ms. Ramirez told friends she couldn’t be sure Kavanaugh was involved:

https://nyti.ms/2puvYrc



5. Ultimately, Ms. Ramirez’ team agreed only to contact the FBI with the claims. She was reportedly interviewed by the FBI during its supplemental background investigation.
More on those background investigations here:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

Yes, it’s clear by now that nothing concerns Republican Senators as long as you love corporations and hate abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

Yes, it’s clear by now that nothing concerns Republican Senators as long as you love corporations and hate abortion.

OK, genius. Tell us about the Democratic Senators who have expressed grave concerns about Kavanaugh's finances after the closed hearing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

Yes, it’s clear by now that nothing concerns Republican Senators as long as you love corporations and hate abortion.

OK, genius. Tell us about the Democratic Senators who have expressed grave concerns about Kavanaugh's finances after the closed hearing.

First tell us why the debt forgiveness wasn’t in his financial disclosure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

Yes, it’s clear by now that nothing concerns Republican Senators as long as you love corporations and hate abortion.

OK, genius. Tell us about the Democratic Senators who have expressed grave concerns about Kavanaugh's finances after the closed hearing.

First tell us why the debt forgiveness wasn’t in his financial disclosure.

I have no clue.
And, I am certain that was addressed in the closed door briefing.
IOW - it is not our business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Full disclosure: I loath Brett, I'm voting for Senator Warren.

I was in a sorority at a fairly selective university -- none of this is shocking. I witnessed much worse by drunk boys, student-athletes, rich boys and mean girls. I'm over it. This just sounds like an insecure gal who used affirmative action to get into an elite college she didn't have the academics chops for, realized very quickly she was in the bottom decile, so she always felt like an outsider. Her professional life is a disappointment. Yale was supposed to be her ticket to the elite. It wasn't. She's angry now, she's been seething since welcome week of freshman year. Proximity to power in the 80s is her ticket to fame, her ticket to cash in in 2019. Our media has become gross. I can't even watch TV or listen to NPR anymore. Just classical music now.

Pretty sure Senator Warren would find your comment condescending and racially loaded. signed, fellow Warren supporter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Sen. Grassley Press
@GrassleyPress
.
@NYTimes
did not contacted Sen. Grassley’s office for this story. If they had, we would've reminded them of a few key public facts they omitted:

1.
@senjudiciary
staff proactively contacted Ms. Ramirez' lawyers soon after the New Yorker story broke.
https://nyti.ms/30g2Nbr

2. Despite 7 attempts by staff, Ms. Ramirez' lawyers declined to provide documentary evidence referenced in the article/witness accounts to support the claims. They also declined invitations for Ms. Ramirez to speak with committee investigators or to provide a written statement.

3. Nonetheless, our investigators spoke to and reviewed material from several Yale classmates of Ms. Ramirez and Justice Kavanaugh in order to assess the claim. You can read the committee’s 414-page investigative summary here:
http://bit.ly/30nwLKG

4. The committee's review found no verifiable evidence to support the claims. The
@nytimes
' own reporting at the time noted that it couldn't find anyone with firsthand knowledge & that Ms. Ramirez told friends she couldn’t be sure Kavanaugh was involved:

https://nyti.ms/2puvYrc



5. Ultimately, Ms. Ramirez’ team agreed only to contact the FBI with the claims. She was reportedly interviewed by the FBI during its supplemental background investigation.
More on those background investigations here:

No one believed the Senate was running a valid investigation. That is why they were not responsive to the committee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

Yes, it’s clear by now that nothing concerns Republican Senators as long as you love corporations and hate abortion.

OK, genius. Tell us about the Democratic Senators who have expressed grave concerns about Kavanaugh's finances after the closed hearing.

First tell us why the debt forgiveness wasn’t in his financial disclosure.

I have no clue.
And, I am certain that was addressed in the closed door briefing.
IOW - it is not our business.

Actually, it is. He was nominated by the President to the Supreme Court. In the old days (ie before 2017) all of this would be public.

[Anonymous]

good. may something good come of this.

https://www.vox.com/2019/9/15/20867090/brett-kavanaugh-allegations-impeach-impeachment-supreme-court

The makeup of the Supreme Court could be a major voting issue in 2020, as the next president will likely get to appoint at least one justice. And the latest allegation against Kavanaugh may heighten concerns about the Court among voters, many of whom were already worried that Kavanaugh would not be an impartial judge.

With the confirmation hearings a year in the past, the justices — and President Trump — may have hoped the controversy around Kavanaugh was fading into the background. But the new reporting by the Times brings it to the fore again — and that could have big implications for the Supreme Court, the 2020 election, and the country as a whole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

Yes, it’s clear by now that nothing concerns Republican Senators as long as you love corporations and hate abortion.

OK, genius. Tell us about the Democratic Senators who have expressed grave concerns about Kavanaugh's finances after the closed hearing.

First tell us why the debt forgiveness wasn’t in his financial disclosure.

I have no clue.
And, I am certain that was addressed in the closed door briefing.
IOW - it is not our business.

Actually, it is. He was nominated by the President to the Supreme Court. In the old days (ie before 2017) all of this would be public.

No, genius. There have always been closed door hearings to discuss issues that are not public.
Sorry your nosy little self can't have all the information you want. Things don't work that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:good. may something good come of this.

https://www.vox.com/2019/9/15/20867090/brett-kavanaugh-allegations-impeach-impeachment-supreme-court

The makeup of the Supreme Court could be a major voting issue in 2020, as the next president will likely get to appoint at least one justice. And the latest allegation against Kavanaugh may heighten concerns about the Court among voters, many of whom were already worried that Kavanaugh would not be an impartial judge.

With the confirmation hearings a year in the past, the justices — and President Trump — may have hoped the controversy around Kavanaugh was fading into the background. But the new reporting by the Times brings it to the fore again — and that could have big implications for the Supreme Court, the 2020 election, and the country as a whole.

It works both ways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did we ever find out who paid off Brett Kavanaugh’s $92,000 country club fees plus his $200,000 credit card debt plus his $1.2 million mortgage, and purchased themselves a SCOTUS seat?

Keep up, son.
That was all covered in the closed Senate hearings.

So what was the answer?

There is a reason it is a closed hearing.
The Senators have all the answers. Interesting that they aren't concerned about the finances.

Yes, it’s clear by now that nothing concerns Republican Senators as long as you love corporations and hate abortion.

OK, genius. Tell us about the Democratic Senators who have expressed grave concerns about Kavanaugh's finances after the closed hearing.

First tell us why the debt forgiveness wasn’t in his financial disclosure.

I have no clue.
And, I am certain that was addressed in the closed door briefing.
IOW - it is not our business.

Actually, it is. He was nominated by the President to the Supreme Court. In the old days (ie before 2017) all of this would be public.

No, genius. There have always been closed door hearings to discuss issues that are not public.
Sorry your nosy little self can't have all the information you want. Things don't work that way.

Source?