Are Boys Bullied for being Uncircumcised?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous



Science will prevail not morons , vaccination and circumcision should be part of your child's birth plan.

Vaccinations yes, circumcision, no. It is a practices with no science behind it, moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who say uncirced is ugly, I believe you feel that way, but I believe it's more about what's familiar to you than aesthetics. A great majority of the world is uncirced. I bet women in those countries think circled is ugly because they don't see it a lot. I don't think we should use aesthetics a reason to circ.

And I think most of the people who say uncirced is ugly have never seen one IRL. When erect, they look THE SAME. I say this as someone who's DH is uncirc'd, but had a couple circ'd partners before him. I don't know about you, but I don't spend time with flaccid ones, so it's a nonissue.

As a nurse who has to look at them and sometimes clean them on coma/elderly, there is lint/crud and sometimes white cakey stuff in-between when opening. I have also seen an infected one and it is enough to want to get my child one. Luckily I had all girls so it was a non-issue.

Maybe if I lived in a country with all full helmets, cleaning this area would be the norm but it is not. Most people do not have them

Does this buildup not occur in women in the labia? Are you for removing that, as well? The disgust over smegma on a man is laughable when you realize that the criticism is coming from women who have similar build-ups. And you would have a fit if men harshly judged you for it!

BTW, the common factor for the build-up (in men and women)? Uncleanliness. And circ or not, I'm not interested in an unclean man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, this will not happen, and neither will the no sex thing. In no situation can I imagine a couple getting all hot and heavy and naked, and then saying, "Oops, look at that. Never mind."

Guys do not spend that much time starting at each other's penises in the locker room, they just don't.

I don't really care how you feel about circumcision one way or the other, but I wish people could actually have a conversation about it without resulting to myths, stereotypes, and unfounded conjecture.

I understand that what the women often decline is oral. Penetration is no biggie, but oral.... not happening.

Guys I know have said they circ'd their son because they didn't want him to have a life with no or fewer BJs than he otherwise might have had.

What about men giving women oral? Are they equally as shallow? Oral sex with an uncirc guy is fine. It might require cleaning one's self off beforehand, but don't most women do this as well?

[Anonymous]

I'm kind of disturbed by all this hate toward the uncir'd men/boys. We come from a line of circumcizers, but we didn't circ our boy b/c we just couldn't get over the idea of cutting off a part of the body that nature put there! DS is only 7, but he doesn't have any problem with it. I hope he doesn't run into the kind of judgment I'm seeing on here. We are not granola-crunchers. We are probably a lot more traditional than many.

I just don't understand why anyone should feel pressured to chop off part of their body to please anyone else!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm kind of disturbed by all this hate toward the uncir'd men/boys. We come from a line of circumcizers, but we didn't circ our boy b/c we just couldn't get over the idea of cutting off a part of the body that nature put there! DS is only 7, but he doesn't have any problem with it. I hope he doesn't run into the kind of judgment I'm seeing on here. We are not granola-crunchers. We are probably a lot more traditional than many.

I just don't understand why anyone should feel pressured to chop off part of their body to please anyone else!

They absolutely shouldn't, but know that there are those who are put off by it, shallow or ignorant or whatever, that's the reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who say uncirced is ugly, I believe you feel that way, but I believe it's more about what's familiar to you than aesthetics. A great majority of the world is uncirced. I bet women in those countries think circled is ugly because they don't see it a lot. I don't think we should use aesthetics a reason to circ.

And I think most of the people who say uncirced is ugly have never seen one IRL. When erect, they look THE SAME. I say this as someone who's DH is uncirc'd, but had a couple circ'd partners before him. I don't know about you, but I don't spend time with flaccid ones, so it's a nonissue.

As a nurse who has to look at them and sometimes clean them on coma/elderly, there is lint/crud and sometimes white cakey stuff in-between when opening. I have also seen an infected one and it is enough to want to get my child one. Luckily I had all girls so it was a non-issue.

Maybe if I lived in a country with all full helmets, cleaning this area would be the norm but it is not. Most people do not have them

Does this buildup not occur in women in the labia? Are you for removing that, as well? The disgust over smegma on a man is laughable when you realize that the criticism is coming from women who have similar build-ups. And you would have a fit if men harshly judged you for it!

BTW, the common factor for the build-up (in men and women)? Uncleanliness. And circ or not, I'm not interested in an unclean man.

Most men are unclean

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm kind of disturbed by all this hate toward the uncir'd men/boys. We come from a line of circumcizers, but we didn't circ our boy b/c we just couldn't get over the idea of cutting off a part of the body that nature put there! DS is only 7, but he doesn't have any problem with it. I hope he doesn't run into the kind of judgment I'm seeing on here. We are not granola-crunchers. We are probably a lot more traditional than many.

I just don't understand why anyone should feel pressured to chop off part of their body to please anyone else!

They absolutely shouldn't, but know that there are those who are put off by it, shallow or ignorant or whatever, that's the reality.

I'm sure PP knows and so do many others. The reality is that I wouldn't want women who are put off by it dating my son. They can go and find a circ'd one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm kind of disturbed by all this hate toward the uncir'd men/boys. We come from a line of circumcizers, but we didn't circ our boy b/c we just couldn't get over the idea of cutting off a part of the body that nature put there! DS is only 7, but he doesn't have any problem with it. I hope he doesn't run into the kind of judgment I'm seeing on here. We are not granola-crunchers. We are probably a lot more traditional than many.

I just don't understand why anyone should feel pressured to chop off part of their body to please anyone else!

They absolutely shouldn't, but know that there are those who are put off by it, shallow or ignorant or whatever, that's the reality.

I'm sure PP knows and so do many others. The reality is that I wouldn't want women who are put off by it dating my son. They can go and find a circ'd one.

Yeah, well you can't control who your son sets his sights on and falls for regardless of her inclinations.

[Anonymous]

Only in the Israeli defense forces....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm kind of disturbed by all this hate toward the uncir'd men/boys. We come from a line of circumcizers, but we didn't circ our boy b/c we just couldn't get over the idea of cutting off a part of the body that nature put there! DS is only 7, but he doesn't have any problem with it. I hope he doesn't run into the kind of judgment I'm seeing on here. We are not granola-crunchers. We are probably a lot more traditional than many.

I just don't understand why anyone should feel pressured to chop off part of their body to please anyone else!

They absolutely shouldn't, but know that there are those who are put off by it, shallow or ignorant or whatever, that's the reality.

Not pp, but hopefully my son's future wife won't have had so many dicks that she has a preference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those who say uncirced is ugly, I believe you feel that way, but I believe it's more about what's familiar to you than aesthetics. A great majority of the world is uncirced. I bet women in those countries think circled is ugly because they don't see it a lot. I don't think we should use aesthetics a reason to circ.

And I think most of the people who say uncirced is ugly have never seen one IRL. When erect, they look THE SAME. I say this as someone who's DH is uncirc'd, but had a couple circ'd partners before him. I don't know about you, but I don't spend time with flaccid ones, so it's a nonissue.

As a nurse who has to look at them and sometimes clean them on coma/elderly, there is lint/crud and sometimes white cakey stuff in-between when opening. I have also seen an infected one and it is enough to want to get my child one. Luckily I had all girls so it was a non-issue.

Maybe if I lived in a country with all full helmets, cleaning this area would be the norm but it is not. Most people do not have them

Does this buildup not occur in women in the labia? Are you for removing that, as well? The disgust over smegma on a man is laughable when you realize that the criticism is coming from women who have similar build-ups. And you would have a fit if men harshly judged you for it!

BTW, the common factor for the build-up (in men and women)? Uncleanliness. And circ or not, I'm not interested in an unclean man.

Most men are unclean

What a way to generalize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm kind of disturbed by all this hate toward the uncir'd men/boys. We come from a line of circumcizers, but we didn't circ our boy b/c we just couldn't get over the idea of cutting off a part of the body that nature put there! DS is only 7, but he doesn't have any problem with it. I hope he doesn't run into the kind of judgment I'm seeing on here. We are not granola-crunchers. We are probably a lot more traditional than many.

I just don't understand why anyone should feel pressured to chop off part of their body to please anyone else!

They absolutely shouldn't, but know that there are those who are put off by it, shallow or ignorant or whatever, that's the reality.

Not pp, but hopefully my son's future wife won't have had so many dicks that she has a preference.

PP really hit on something about having that MIL, the one who is so worked up about not having her son "mutilated." wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Science will prevail not morons , vaccination and circumcision should be part of your child's birth plan.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous



Science will prevail not morons , vaccination and circumcision should be part of your child's birth plan.

Vaccinations yes, circumcision, no. It is a practices with no science behind it, moron.

I think you are not reading what AAP and all of the research has proven. We also spend millions on circumcision to prevent the spread of diseases in the developing world. Those two facts should be enough evidence to justify the procedure and the benefits to someone with a half a brain.

Hey it's tax season some of you taxes went to circumcising the developing world!!! Congrats on supporting it without knowing it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm kind of disturbed by all this hate toward the uncir'd men/boys. We come from a line of circumcizers, but we didn't circ our boy b/c we just couldn't get over the idea of cutting off a part of the body that nature put there! DS is only 7, but he doesn't have any problem with it. I hope he doesn't run into the kind of judgment I'm seeing on here. We are not granola-crunchers. We are probably a lot more traditional than many.

I just don't understand why anyone should feel pressured to chop off part of their body to please anyone else!

They absolutely shouldn't, but know that there are those who are put off by it, shallow or ignorant or whatever, that's the reality.

Not pp, but hopefully my son's future wife won't have had so many dicks that she has a preference.

PP really hit on something about having that MIL, the one who is so worked up about not having her son "mutilated." wow.

Do I smell a whore?