Queen Elizabeth Platinum Jubilee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Solid gold coach? I wonder where the raw material was looted from.

India and Africa, like everything else valuable that they own.

Dearie, the most valuable thing the royal family owns is real estate in both India and Africa and throughout the world. That "gold" carriage is nothing compared to the real estate cash flow.

WTF? Are you 822 years old?

Any land the royal family owns in India and Africa is land they STOLE. They are disgusting racist a-holes.

And everyone in America—including you—lives on stolen land.

I guess all of us are disgusting racist a-holes?

Land stolen by the British. You really can’t win, can you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Solid gold coach? I wonder where the raw material was looted from.

India and Africa, like everything else valuable that they own.

Dearie, the most valuable thing the royal family owns is real estate in both India and Africa and throughout the world. That "gold" carriage is nothing compared to the real estate cash flow.

WTF? Are you 822 years old?

Any land the royal family owns in India and Africa is land they STOLE. They are disgusting racist a-holes.

And everyone in America—including you—lives on stolen land.

I guess all of us are disgusting racist a-holes?

Land stolen by the British. You really can’t win, can you?

Yep. My house is on property that was originally stolen by the british crown and then granted to brisish aristocrats

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

Tell me you're a middle aged white woman without telling me you're a middle aged white woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

Tell me you're a middle aged white woman without telling me you're a middle aged white woman.

This construction and sentiment is more tired than a middle aged white woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

Tell me you're a middle aged white woman without telling me you're a middle aged white woman.

Sick burn, bro. Sick burn.

[Anonymous]

I can't get over how many people have lived and often died without knowing any sovereign other than the queen, particularly those in Commonwealth countries, where QEII is on the currency. My parents were a bit older and remembered a king, my grandparents remembered 3 kings and 1 queen, but for me QEII has been the only one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.[/quote
]

She was from an aristocratic family. She knew how those marriages worked. Even I know how they worked and I’m neither from England nor an aristocratic family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

She was from an aristocratic family. She knew how those marriages worked. Even I know how they worked and I’m neither from England nor an aristocratic family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

She was from an aristocratic family. She knew how those marriages worked. Even I know how they worked and I’m neither from England nor an aristocratic family.

She was only 19 and seemed pretty naive, plus her family of origin was pretty messed up, so it's hard to know what she imagined her marriage would be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

Her kids have two parents. Not just one. And they were in boarding school most of the year.

And where was Charles when she was galavanting across Europe with her boy toys? In England.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How are her clothes so unflattering?

Why is there a nipple showing through that lump of a jacket?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How are her clothes so unflattering?

Why is there a nipple showing through that lump of a jacket?

That jacket is hideous. The belt cheapens it and it has a flap on the back that makes it look like a rain trenchcoat. Kate meanwhile is impeccable even in that yellow frock earlier, which I didn't love but the waist detail was pretty. And why was Meghan shushing the little ones yesterday? do they even know who she is? She's the random aunt that shows up at a family even that no one ever sees. What Harry must be thinking to now be demoted to a B-list royal. Couldn't even stand on the balcony yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

She was from an aristocratic family. She knew how those marriages worked. Even I know how they worked and I’m neither from England nor an aristocratic family.

She was only 19 and seemed pretty naive, plus her family of origin was pretty messed up, so it's hard to know what she imagined her marriage would be.

She knew enough to ask her sisters whether she should bail just before the wedding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question but why do you Americans care about Royals and England? Do you have some sort of feelings because our founding fathers (and most of your heritage I suppose) came from there? I grew up in this country but never really understood why people care so much.

I cannot speak for anyone else but I caught "Di fevor" and only watch now to see what a disaster the Royals are without her.

Americans are so weird about Diana, she was not the angel you think she was and everyone knows it excep the Americans apparently. I don't understand the obsession with a seriously flawed woman who basically abandoned her children for her lovers.

I think it's only Americans of a certain age who were around for the wedding and bought into the fairytale marriage aspect of it. I'm 37 and by the time I knew anything about her it was all tabloid trash, trainwreck mode stuff you'd see at the supermarket and not think much more about.

Totally agree - I think most people realize that she was seriously flawed and was an equal contributor to all the drama.

This is simply ludicrous. She married a man who never intended to make a good faith effort in the marriage, and the power differential was enormous.

She was from an aristocratic family. She knew how those marriages worked. Even I know how they worked and I’m neither from England nor an aristocratic family.

She was only 19 and seemed pretty naive, plus her family of origin was pretty messed up, so it's hard to know what she imagined her marriage would be.

She knew enough to ask her sisters whether she should bail just before the wedding.

By that point, the pressure to go through with it would be insane. Heck, any average bride with invitations sent and deposits paid on a 40k wedding feels at least some pressure to tamp down misgivings. Heads of state scheduled to arrive from around the world attending a wedding watched by a billion people? Good God!