Gorsuch is apparently a real d**k

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

The story has not been verified as false. For the millionth time, the justices' statements do not contradict what NPR reported.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

How do you double down when the principles involve deny the report? That’s the definition of insanity and is this petty partisan bullsh*t what we want our Supreme Court justices to be dealing with?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

How do you double down when the principles involve deny the report? That’s the definition of insanity and is this petty partisan bullsh*t what we want our Supreme Court justices to be dealing with?

Gorsuch brought the "petty partisan bullshit" on himself when he chose to use the GOP epithet "Democrat judge" in his confirmation hearing when referring to a lower court colleague. It was his bat signal to the base that all is good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

How do you double down when the principles involve deny the report? That’s the definition of insanity and is this petty partisan bullsh*t what we want our Supreme Court justices to be dealing with?

Gorsuch brought the "petty partisan bullshit" on himself when he chose to use the GOP epithet "Democrat judge" in his confirmation hearing when referring to a lower court colleague. It was his bat signal to the base that all is good.

So, do you think this was Nina Totenberg's motivation in writing a hit piece on the Supreme Court? Because he referred to someone as a Democrat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

More hyperbole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

How do you double down when the principles involve deny the report? That’s the definition of insanity and is this petty partisan bullsh*t what we want our Supreme Court justices to be dealing with?

They deny something, not the precise words of the report. They are very talented jurists and lawyers (many of them, some are straight hacks). “We deny the report in its entirety” is what you are hearing, but it’s not what they are saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

How do you double down when the principles involve deny the report? That’s the definition of insanity and is this petty partisan bullsh*t what we want our Supreme Court justices to be dealing with?

They deny something, not the precise words of the report. They are very talented jurists and lawyers (many of them, some are straight hacks). “We deny the report in its entirety” is what you are hearing, but it’s not what they are saying.

+1

Nina Totenberg hasn’t lost any respect except in the eyes of right wingers who, let’s be honest, think anyone to the left of Sean Hannity should be removed from society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every human being - EXCEPT NEIL GORSUCH - is wearing a mask inside the Supreme Court building.

You can draw any conclusion you wish from that fact.

That he’s pro-science?

As much as I hate to agree, the science is not supporting continued masking.

Not sure where you are getting that idea.

We are still very much in a pandemic, and the science shows that proper masking changes the amount of time it would take for COVID to transmit from an infected person to an uninfected person from minutes to hours.

So not so useful in situations where people are spending hours together….

Sure. But then why force them to spend hours together?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

No clue? FOX verifiably lies far more frequently and far more egregiously than NPR does. That's why. Pretending to care about respect and journalistic integrity is a complete joke if you're going to try and shield FOX.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

No clue? FOX verifiably lies far more frequently and far more egregiously than NPR does. That's why. Pretending to care about respect and journalistic integrity is a complete joke if you're going to try and shield FOX.

Once again... this story has nothing to do with Fox. You are deflecting.
This thread is about a reporter from NPR who wrote a hit piece that turned out to be false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry - I'm taking the word of three of the best legal minds in our country over some reporter. YMMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

+100
The whataboutism is typical and pathetic. They can't bring themselves to admit they were flat-out wrong about this story; instead, they double-down and pivot to accusing Fox of lying. The reaction from LWNJs regarding this fake story is so telling.

[Anonymous]

Why doesn’t justice sotomayir retire if he health is so frail and while we still have a Democratic President? Hasn’t she learned from RBG?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nina Totenberg is a well-respected journalist. Fox employs liars and hacks. Enough said.

Sorry, friend. Nina has lost a ton of respect after this debacle. And, credibility.
And, NPR's effort to double down on a verifiably false story discredits their whole organization.

And, I have no clue why you decided to bring up Fox, other than you view this ridiculous fake news as an opportunity to slam a network you don't like.

How do you double down when the principles involve deny the report? That’s the definition of insanity and is this petty partisan bullsh*t what we want our Supreme Court justices to be dealing with?

They deny something, not the precise words of the report. They are very talented jurists and lawyers (many of them, some are straight hacks). “We deny the report in its entirety” is what you are hearing, but it’s not what they are saying.

DP. That's exactly what they're saying. All three of them. It's just not what you want to hear. So disappointing to be caught in YET ANOTHER fake news story, amirite?