Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what the truth is between these two people, but I am so troubled by the tenor of the comments about Amber Heard. I can't remember the last time there has been such online viciousness all against a single celebrity in a he said/she said situation. The misogyny here makes me seriously worried for my daughter. If Amber Heard is lying and has had a multi-year plan to increase her profile, that is a bummer. But the thousands of people coming after her online, trying to end her career (the petition to have her removed from Aquaman) and publicly shamed - what in the world is happening? That guy from Empire (Smolett?) faked his assault for publicity and was convicted and didn't go through 10% of this hatred.

Hard agree. This has been freaking me out also. Thanks for saying this!

Absolutely agree. And so many fronting like Johnny’s avenging angels wtf? It’s clear he was/is an alcoholic and an addict who was prone to violent rages and who behaved beyond unprofessionally on set until Disney couldn’t take it anymore. I personally think the truth lies somewhere in the middle of these two unlikable people, and cannot believe so many believe Johnny is some kind of an angelic victim. It’s sick.

I also agree! People are saying how likable he is and how horrible she is. The guy sent texts talking about burning and killing her. He's an unstable drug addict who definitely verbally abused her and probably wouldn't even remember if he hit her based on how messed up he was during the recordings. Also, I'm sick of people saying "why did she record their fight?", "She was setting him up!" in domestic abuse if you don't document the incidents, people are not going to believe you. That is the ONLY thing being proven by this case. She's definately messed up too, but he's the one dragging this out and is set on publicly humiliating her.

Don’t forget the text where he said he then wanted to f#ck her corpse to make sure she was really dead.

How can anyone support this guy after seeing his texts? Those are seriously sick. While I think AH also abused him and likely lied or at least exaggerated, there is no way you can convince me he is not a domestic abuser after seeing these. Normal men don’t talk like this. And people don’t apologize for the monster unless they really had something to apologize for. I predict he loses this case and hope he never works again. I am truly sickened that there are so many people who support a man who talked about burning and drowning his wife then f-ing her corpse. Sick!

You’re not wrong about saying he likely abused her…but to comment on how he writes in his texts as a basis to not support someone. She tells her husband to suck her dick. That’s pretty nasty stuff. “Normal women don’t talk like this.” Neither deserves support.

Telling a man to suck a di** vs texting about your dead wife’s body in a trunk and punching her in the face …. Yeah, totally the same thing.

Neither are okay. Your standards are very low.

One is the commonly used equivalent of telling someone to go eff themselves, which is hardly becoming, but has nothing in common with telling someone you want to rape and kill them.

DP. Except Amber actually cut off Johnny's finger.

You are a liar. Shame on you.

Yes this has been debunked. As has the edited audio people are so fond of pointing at. And no, she didn't poop in the bed. Again the UK judge clearly went over all of this. It's not hard to find.

I didn't pay much attention before this trial so I just assumed they were both terrible. But now I realize that it was because of a massive PR campaign by Depp. He's disgusting.

He is, but I am more stunned and appalled by the women taking up for him.

I'm appalled as well at seeing/learning about this toxic relationship and standing by him.

I would never stand by any man that calls a female derogatory names....

But it's okay for AH to call him these names, right? She can mock his age, weight, career status, fatherhood, alcohol abuse, drug addiction...tell him to suck her d###.....these should all be okay because he's a male, right?

This is what I don't get. I'm supposed to be on AH's team because I, too, possess a uterus? I've followed the trial, I've listened to the testimony, and I actually went into this with an open mind. I've never watched JD movies, and haven't ever been into him or followed his career. He sounds like a drunk and a drug addict. But this trial isn't about how sweet he is or isn't. The evidence as presented has shown that SHE was abusive and while he likely was too, much of what I've heard from his team is that he spent a good deal of time hiding in bathrooms and trying to get away from her, while she's sitting there alleging all kinds of DV with no real evidence of injury. NO medical reports, police reports, even photos of swollen noses? She could take all those photos of him passed out, photos of broken things, stuff scribbled on mirrors, etc. But she never took a clear photo of her swollen nose and the subsequent black eyes from it? Makeup artists are putting makeup on her the next morning and saying they saw NOTHING on her face? She's just not believable, simply because she claims she is. There must be some burden of proof, even with DV. Often times, the burden of proof reveals itself during the police response or medical report. Or the actual broken nose in the morning. In this case, there are none.

So, yeah, I'm not on JD's team necessarily, because I think they're both nuts. I'm just not on her side and question why I should be expected to be just because she's claiming DV -- with no real proof. I'm so over this whole MeToo movement notion that as long as a woman claims harassment or DV, she is to be believed. Careers, reputations, etc can and should be ruined because the woman is to be believed at all costs. This trial isn't about personalities, or even drug and alcohol abuse. It's about whether or not her allegation of being a DV survivor are true in light of the impact those allegations have made to his career.

Defamation. It’s about defamation and he brought the action.

“She also is not my cup of tea” doesn’t cut it. By “it” I mean, it’s irrelevant to his claim and her counterclaim, and you fail yet again in trying to come across as having a balanced, reasoned take. Poor thing.

Again? This is my first response to your comment above.

I'm well aware of what it's about and who brought the action, and I don't actually think he's going to win. I'm just not ready to canonize AH as some virtuous poster child for DV, regardless of how much of a $hitbag I think JD probably is. You can actually say you think AH is not being truthful without being a JD fangirl. It's called nuance. You should try it.

And btw, trying to sound condescending by saying "poor thing" only works if you actually sound intelligent in your own reasoning...which can hardly be characterized as a balanced, reasoned take.

She or he didn’t say ‘poor thing,’ that’s my line. You’re so unbelievably dumb that it’s hard not to pity you. No one is canonizing Amber. You and your fellow slime trails here keep positing that and no one, not one post I’ve seen here, has done so. And I love how engage in your misogyny but your delicate self can’t type out shitbag. Let me help you: you’re a shitbag. You’re defending a shitbag. Your brain could be replaced with a shitbag, with minimal loss of function. Does that help?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what the truth is between these two people, but I am so troubled by the tenor of the comments about Amber Heard. I can't remember the last time there has been such online viciousness all against a single celebrity in a he said/she said situation. The misogyny here makes me seriously worried for my daughter. If Amber Heard is lying and has had a multi-year plan to increase her profile, that is a bummer. But the thousands of people coming after her online, trying to end her career (the petition to have her removed from Aquaman) and publicly shamed - what in the world is happening? That guy from Empire (Smolett?) faked his assault for publicity and was convicted and didn't go through 10% of this hatred.

Hard agree. This has been freaking me out also. Thanks for saying this!

Absolutely agree. And so many fronting like Johnny’s avenging angels wtf? It’s clear he was/is an alcoholic and an addict who was prone to violent rages and who behaved beyond unprofessionally on set until Disney couldn’t take it anymore. I personally think the truth lies somewhere in the middle of these two unlikable people, and cannot believe so many believe Johnny is some kind of an angelic victim. It’s sick.

I also agree! People are saying how likable he is and how horrible she is. The guy sent texts talking about burning and killing her. He's an unstable drug addict who definitely verbally abused her and probably wouldn't even remember if he hit her based on how messed up he was during the recordings. Also, I'm sick of people saying "why did she record their fight?", "She was setting him up!" in domestic abuse if you don't document the incidents, people are not going to believe you. That is the ONLY thing being proven by this case. She's definately messed up too, but he's the one dragging this out and is set on publicly humiliating her.

Don’t forget the text where he said he then wanted to f#ck her corpse to make sure she was really dead.

How can anyone support this guy after seeing his texts? Those are seriously sick. While I think AH also abused him and likely lied or at least exaggerated, there is no way you can convince me he is not a domestic abuser after seeing these. Normal men don’t talk like this. And people don’t apologize for the monster unless they really had something to apologize for. I predict he loses this case and hope he never works again. I am truly sickened that there are so many people who support a man who talked about burning and drowning his wife then f-ing her corpse. Sick!

You’re not wrong about saying he likely abused her…but to comment on how he writes in his texts as a basis to not support someone. She tells her husband to suck her dick. That’s pretty nasty stuff. “Normal women don’t talk like this.” Neither deserves support.

Telling a man to suck a di** vs texting about your dead wife’s body in a trunk and punching her in the face …. Yeah, totally the same thing.

Neither are okay. Your standards are very low.

One is the commonly used equivalent of telling someone to go eff themselves, which is hardly becoming, but has nothing in common with telling someone you want to rape and kill them.

DP. Except Amber actually cut off Johnny's finger.

You are a liar. Shame on you.

Hurling the word "liar" around is like using the word "racist" nowadays. Anytime someone sees something different than you do, they're "A LIAR"!! It was alleged during the trial that AH through a phone at JD, which resulted in the end of his finger being cut off. How does repeating this (whether you believe the testimony or not) make PP a LIAR?

You are a liar because the post indicates that its something like verifiable truth that Heard cut off his finger. That is utterly false. The sworn testimony from his doctor is that Depp told him he did it. The rest of your illiterate invective is beneath me in terms of a response.

Actually... there's an audio tape where Heard admits to causing the finger to be severed. She's crying and admits she did it. I guess it can't be admitted in court because there are other people on the tape besides the two of them.

From strictly a technical legal standpoint, would this be admissible if they asked each witness on the recording to acknowledge their voices on the recording?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

Because you’re acting like an asshole. That’s why. This entire thread has been dedicated to a psychopath unable to let go of his ex-wife, and populated by women who themselves have set back a basic and humane understanding of how DV can function several hundred years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what the truth is between these two people, but I am so troubled by the tenor of the comments about Amber Heard. I can't remember the last time there has been such online viciousness all against a single celebrity in a he said/she said situation. The misogyny here makes me seriously worried for my daughter. If Amber Heard is lying and has had a multi-year plan to increase her profile, that is a bummer. But the thousands of people coming after her online, trying to end her career (the petition to have her removed from Aquaman) and publicly shamed - what in the world is happening? That guy from Empire (Smolett?) faked his assault for publicity and was convicted and didn't go through 10% of this hatred.

Hard agree. This has been freaking me out also. Thanks for saying this!

Absolutely agree. And so many fronting like Johnny’s avenging angels wtf? It’s clear he was/is an alcoholic and an addict who was prone to violent rages and who behaved beyond unprofessionally on set until Disney couldn’t take it anymore. I personally think the truth lies somewhere in the middle of these two unlikable people, and cannot believe so many believe Johnny is some kind of an angelic victim. It’s sick.

I also agree! People are saying how likable he is and how horrible she is. The guy sent texts talking about burning and killing her. He's an unstable drug addict who definitely verbally abused her and probably wouldn't even remember if he hit her based on how messed up he was during the recordings. Also, I'm sick of people saying "why did she record their fight?", "She was setting him up!" in domestic abuse if you don't document the incidents, people are not going to believe you. That is the ONLY thing being proven by this case. She's definately messed up too, but he's the one dragging this out and is set on publicly humiliating her.

Don’t forget the text where he said he then wanted to f#ck her corpse to make sure she was really dead.

How can anyone support this guy after seeing his texts? Those are seriously sick. While I think AH also abused him and likely lied or at least exaggerated, there is no way you can convince me he is not a domestic abuser after seeing these. Normal men don’t talk like this. And people don’t apologize for the monster unless they really had something to apologize for. I predict he loses this case and hope he never works again. I am truly sickened that there are so many people who support a man who talked about burning and drowning his wife then f-ing her corpse. Sick!

You’re not wrong about saying he likely abused her…but to comment on how he writes in his texts as a basis to not support someone. She tells her husband to suck her dick. That’s pretty nasty stuff. “Normal women don’t talk like this.” Neither deserves support.

Telling a man to suck a di** vs texting about your dead wife’s body in a trunk and punching her in the face …. Yeah, totally the same thing.

Neither are okay. Your standards are very low.

One is the commonly used equivalent of telling someone to go eff themselves, which is hardly becoming, but has nothing in common with telling someone you want to rape and kill them.

DP. Except Amber actually cut off Johnny's finger.

You are a liar. Shame on you.

Hurling the word "liar" around is like using the word "racist" nowadays. Anytime someone sees something different than you do, they're "A LIAR"!! It was alleged during the trial that AH through a phone at JD, which resulted in the end of his finger being cut off. How does repeating this (whether you believe the testimony or not) make PP a LIAR?

You are a liar because the post indicates that its something like verifiable truth that Heard cut off his finger. That is utterly false. The sworn testimony from his doctor is that Depp told him he did it. The rest of your illiterate invective is beneath me in terms of a response.

Actually... there's an audio tape where Heard admits to causing the finger to be severed. She's crying and admits she did it. I guess it can't be admitted in court because there are other people on the tape besides the two of them.

From strictly a technical legal standpoint, would this be admissible if they asked each witness on the recording to acknowledge their voices on the recording?

What tape? What unedited, unbiased source does this come from, pray tell? If it’s unimpeachable, why on Earth would this not have been presented by Depp’s attorneys, pro-Depp Perry Madumbs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

still team Johnny. FYI wow Ellen Barkin was unrecognizable. I guess good that she is natural but makes me feel old.

Team Johnny? What are you, 12?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Wow, are you the same little harpy who keeps responding in such a vicious and nasty way to anyone who isn't team AH? I'm the farthest thing from "purported feminism", trust me. To attack another female's appearance from the safety of your keyboard while holding up and defending another female's alleged victimization is pretty rich. But hey, at least you used the word "special" appropriately this time. Cue the screeching again...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

still team Johnny. FYI wow Ellen Barkin was unrecognizable. I guess good that she is natural but makes me feel old.

Team Johnny? What are you, 12?

Let’s not insult tweens. This gem is busy thinking Ellen Barkin - who at minimum had a sexual relationship with him on her own terms when he hadn’t melted into a pile of cocaine grains and chub - looks old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Wow, are you the same little harpy who keeps responding in such a vicious and nasty way to anyone who isn't team AH? I'm the farthest thing from "purported feminism", trust me. To attack another female's appearance from the safety of your keyboard while holding up and defending another female's alleged victimization is pretty rich. But hey, at least you used the word "special" appropriately this time. Cue the screeching again...

You’re just not smart. The entire concept of ellipses are begging you to learn something, anything. How are you going to have a purpose when your crush doesn’t win? It’s going to be hard for you to fill your days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

+1. PP doesn't understand that he or she is responding to multiple people. Everyone is clearly the enemy.

[Anonymous]

This article references a writer for the Guardian reflecting on the harassment and vitriol issued by Depp’s fanbase. I thought some of the trash here would want to reflect on some of their good works!

https://www.vice.com/en/article/4aw93j/justice-for-johnny-depp-internet-comments

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Why are you speaking to people this way? You can get a point across without name calling…

+1. PP doesn't understand that he or she is responding to multiple people. Everyone is clearly the enemy.

Nope. I understand there are many of you, and you’re all assholes. I’m heartened that there are some women who see what I see here, and agree in gentler terms that you are - each and collectively - beneath contempt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know what the truth is between these two people, but I am so troubled by the tenor of the comments about Amber Heard. I can't remember the last time there has been such online viciousness all against a single celebrity in a he said/she said situation. The misogyny here makes me seriously worried for my daughter. If Amber Heard is lying and has had a multi-year plan to increase her profile, that is a bummer. But the thousands of people coming after her online, trying to end her career (the petition to have her removed from Aquaman) and publicly shamed - what in the world is happening? That guy from Empire (Smolett?) faked his assault for publicity and was convicted and didn't go through 10% of this hatred.

Hard agree. This has been freaking me out also. Thanks for saying this!

Absolutely agree. And so many fronting like Johnny’s avenging angels wtf? It’s clear he was/is an alcoholic and an addict who was prone to violent rages and who behaved beyond unprofessionally on set until Disney couldn’t take it anymore. I personally think the truth lies somewhere in the middle of these two unlikable people, and cannot believe so many believe Johnny is some kind of an angelic victim. It’s sick.

I also agree! People are saying how likable he is and how horrible she is. The guy sent texts talking about burning and killing her. He's an unstable drug addict who definitely verbally abused her and probably wouldn't even remember if he hit her based on how messed up he was during the recordings. Also, I'm sick of people saying "why did she record their fight?", "She was setting him up!" in domestic abuse if you don't document the incidents, people are not going to believe you. That is the ONLY thing being proven by this case. She's definately messed up too, but he's the one dragging this out and is set on publicly humiliating her.

Don’t forget the text where he said he then wanted to f#ck her corpse to make sure she was really dead.

How can anyone support this guy after seeing his texts? Those are seriously sick. While I think AH also abused him and likely lied or at least exaggerated, there is no way you can convince me he is not a domestic abuser after seeing these. Normal men don’t talk like this. And people don’t apologize for the monster unless they really had something to apologize for. I predict he loses this case and hope he never works again. I am truly sickened that there are so many people who support a man who talked about burning and drowning his wife then f-ing her corpse. Sick!

You’re not wrong about saying he likely abused her…but to comment on how he writes in his texts as a basis to not support someone. She tells her husband to suck her dick. That’s pretty nasty stuff. “Normal women don’t talk like this.” Neither deserves support.

Telling a man to suck a di** vs texting about your dead wife’s body in a trunk and punching her in the face …. Yeah, totally the same thing.

Neither are okay. Your standards are very low.

One is the commonly used equivalent of telling someone to go eff themselves, which is hardly becoming, but has nothing in common with telling someone you want to rape and kill them.

DP. Except Amber actually cut off Johnny's finger.

You are a liar. Shame on you.

Yes this has been debunked. As has the edited audio people are so fond of pointing at. And no, she didn't poop in the bed. Again the UK judge clearly went over all of this. It's not hard to find.

I didn't pay much attention before this trial so I just assumed they were both terrible. But now I realize that it was because of a massive PR campaign by Depp. He's disgusting.

He is, but I am more stunned and appalled by the women taking up for him.

I'm appalled as well at seeing/learning about this toxic relationship and standing by him.

I would never stand by any man that calls a female derogatory names....

But it's okay for AH to call him these names, right? She can mock his age, weight, career status, fatherhood, alcohol abuse, drug addiction...tell him to suck her d###.....these should all be okay because he's a male, right?

This is what I don't get. I'm supposed to be on AH's team because I, too, possess a uterus? I've followed the trial, I've listened to the testimony, and I actually went into this with an open mind. I've never watched JD movies, and haven't ever been into him or followed his career. He sounds like a drunk and a drug addict. But this trial isn't about how sweet he is or isn't. The evidence as presented has shown that SHE was abusive and while he likely was too, much of what I've heard from his team is that he spent a good deal of time hiding in bathrooms and trying to get away from her, while she's sitting there alleging all kinds of DV with no real evidence of injury. NO medical reports, police reports, even photos of swollen noses? She could take all those photos of him passed out, photos of broken things, stuff scribbled on mirrors, etc. But she never took a clear photo of her swollen nose and the subsequent black eyes from it? Makeup artists are putting makeup on her the next morning and saying they saw NOTHING on her face? She's just not believable, simply because she claims she is. There must be some burden of proof, even with DV. Often times, the burden of proof reveals itself during the police response or medical report. Or the actual broken nose in the morning. In this case, there are none.

So, yeah, I'm not on JD's team necessarily, because I think they're both nuts. I'm just not on her side and question why I should be expected to be just because she's claiming DV -- with no real proof. I'm so over this whole MeToo movement notion that as long as a woman claims harassment or DV, she is to be believed. Careers, reputations, etc can and should be ruined because the woman is to be believed at all costs. This trial isn't about personalities, or even drug and alcohol abuse. It's about whether or not her allegation of being a DV survivor are true in light of the impact those allegations have made to his career.

Defamation. It’s about defamation and he brought the action.

“She also is not my cup of tea” doesn’t cut it. By “it” I mean, it’s irrelevant to his claim and her counterclaim, and you fail yet again in trying to come across as having a balanced, reasoned take. Poor thing.

Again? This is my first response to your comment above.

I'm well aware of what it's about and who brought the action, and I don't actually think he's going to win. I'm just not ready to canonize AH as some virtuous poster child for DV, regardless of how much of a $hitbag I think JD probably is. You can actually say you think AH is not being truthful without being a JD fangirl. It's called nuance. You should try it.

And btw, trying to sound condescending by saying "poor thing" only works if you actually sound intelligent in your own reasoning...which can hardly be characterized as a balanced, reasoned take.

She or he didn’t say ‘poor thing,’ that’s my line. You’re so unbelievably dumb that it’s hard not to pity you. No one is canonizing Amber. You and your fellow slime trails here keep positing that and no one, not one post I’ve seen here, has done so. And I love how engage in your misogyny but your delicate self can’t type out shitbag. Let me help you: you’re a shitbag. You’re defending a shitbag. Your brain could be replaced with a shitbag, with minimal loss of function. Does that help?

+1000

There are some real idiots posting on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Wow, are you the same little harpy who keeps responding in such a vicious and nasty way to anyone who isn't team AH? I'm the farthest thing from "purported feminism", trust me. To attack another female's appearance from the safety of your keyboard while holding up and defending another female's alleged victimization is pretty rich. But hey, at least you used the word "special" appropriately this time. Cue the screeching again...

You’re just not smart. The entire concept of ellipses are begging you to learn something, anything. How are you going to have a purpose when your crush doesn’t win? It’s going to be hard for you to fill your days.

Game over. I think we've confirmed this idiot is a thirteen year old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This article references a writer for the Guardian reflecting on the harassment and vitriol issued by Depp’s fanbase. I thought some of the trash here would want to reflect on some of their good works!

https://www.vice.com/en/article/4aw93j/justice-for-johnny-depp-internet-comments

Hid fan base isn’t here, crazy pants! No one has said positive things about JD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I have read in multiple places now that Heard’s counsel has as of today proven a financial link between Depp and bot farms attacking her. Do you asshole women defending him - if you are indeed women - not feel a little forking stupid right now?

You’re too old, too unpretty and too unspecial for him. But at least you all have each other!

Nice comments from someone who pretends to be on the side of women (AH), all the while attacking other women who disagree with her by calling them "too old, too unpretty and too unspecial." I'd call you a hypocrite but I'm not sure someone who actually uses the word "unspecial" would actually know what that word means.

Listen, asshole, I’m not the one who maintains that someone subjected to DV has to respond with perfect, saintly victimization in order to be believed. Take your purported feminism and dull use of language and put them somewhere special - perhaps Depp will deign to cavity search you.

He’s very, very likely to lose this absurd cause of action. However will you deal, chunks? I’m all ears.

Wow, are you the same little harpy who keeps responding in such a vicious and nasty way to anyone who isn't team AH? I'm the farthest thing from "purported feminism", trust me. To attack another female's appearance from the safety of your keyboard while holding up and defending another female's alleged victimization is pretty rich. But hey, at least you used the word "special" appropriately this time. Cue the screeching again...

You’re just not smart. The entire concept of ellipses are begging you to learn something, anything. How are you going to have a purpose when your crush doesn’t win? It’s going to be hard for you to fill your days.

Game over. I think we've confirmed this idiot is a thirteen year old.

No, doesn’t work that way. You’re just not able to have an argument online with someone who unlike you, is able to think. I’m so sorry for you.