The Talk put on hiatus thanks to Sharon Osbourne

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

DP. Exactly. She doesn’t need to stay in touch with him.

But the fact that they aren’t buddies anymore isn’t because of racism.

They aren’t friends anymore because she chose to not be his friend.

His rants about her is racism.

Would you mind please specifying the racism? Just if you could, please show us how Piers was racist against Meghan. Thanks.

\

I am the poster who thinks he's misogynistic who you are happy with because I'm 'reasonable' I guess and we're in the minority in this thread.

You are very good at ignoring the parts of posts you don't want to read.

Piers Morgan has said racist things. I provided many tweets earlier. He walked off set of his show (unprecedented even in his career of tantrums!) when chastised by a black man. He also has a vendetta against a biracial woman that is far out of proportion to anything she has done. It is REASONABLE for people to then put two and two together to assume that his racist comments imply that he is racist and therefore his vendetta against the black woman has racist roots but because he is a not unintelligent guy, he has managed to not 'say the quiet part out loud' so to speak in his rants about her.

That is a reasonable logical leap. You have not made a single comment to refute this other than to petulantly ask for something he SPECIFICALLY SAID ABOUT MM.

And additionally, it is Piers Morgan's FAULT that he is facing these charges. He has been so uniformly hateful that people think is is racist, a transphobe, a misogynist, anti muslim, everything. Your defense to this is, 'since he hates everyone, he can't be racist'. And I say to you, because he hates everyone, he is ALL OF THOSE THINGS.

Again, what I’m looking for is evidence that Piers was racist against Meghan. That’s all I’m looking for. Nothing else.

Again, people have ceded that he hasn't said that but concluded that the totality of his actions implies bias. You refuse to engage with this discussion in good faith.

So you feel like he was racist but don’t have proof?

Who cares what you think if you don’t have proof? I don’t know you. Maybe you have terrible judgment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

Yes, quite true but he'd have deemed it very rude and so was offended. Given he was famous at that point and no one in the UK knew who she was, I think he felt used.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

DP. Exactly. She doesn’t need to stay in touch with him.

But the fact that they aren’t buddies anymore isn’t because of racism.

They aren’t friends anymore because she chose to not be his friend.

His rants about her is racism.

Would you mind please specifying the racism? Just if you could, please show us how Piers was racist against Meghan. Thanks.

\

I am the poster who thinks he's misogynistic who you are happy with because I'm 'reasonable' I guess and we're in the minority in this thread.

You are very good at ignoring the parts of posts you don't want to read.

Piers Morgan has said racist things. I provided many tweets earlier. He walked off set of his show (unprecedented even in his career of tantrums!) when chastised by a black man. He also has a vendetta against a biracial woman that is far out of proportion to anything she has done. It is REASONABLE for people to then put two and two together to assume that his racist comments imply that he is racist and therefore his vendetta against the black woman has racist roots but because he is a not unintelligent guy, he has managed to not 'say the quiet part out loud' so to speak in his rants about her.

That is a reasonable logical leap. You have not made a single comment to refute this other than to petulantly ask for something he SPECIFICALLY SAID ABOUT MM.

And additionally, it is Piers Morgan's FAULT that he is facing these charges. He has been so uniformly hateful that people think is is racist, a transphobe, a misogynist, anti muslim, everything. Your defense to this is, 'since he hates everyone, he can't be racist'. And I say to you, because he hates everyone, he is ALL OF THOSE THINGS.

Again, what I’m looking for is evidence that Piers was racist against Meghan. That’s all I’m looking for. Nothing else.

Again, people have ceded that he hasn't said that but concluded that the totality of his actions implies bias. You refuse to engage with this discussion in good faith.

So you feel like he was racist but don’t have proof?


Who cares what you think if you don’t have proof? I don’t know you. Maybe you have terrible judgment.

You did not find my proof compelling because you decided it was not proof. You need something explicit to consider it proof. That says something about your judgement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

DP. Exactly. She doesn’t need to stay in touch with him.

But the fact that they aren’t buddies anymore isn’t because of racism.

They aren’t friends anymore because she chose to not be his friend.

His rants about her is racism.

Would you mind please specifying the racism? Just if you could, please show us how Piers was racist against Meghan. Thanks.

\

I am the poster who thinks he's misogynistic who you are happy with because I'm 'reasonable' I guess and we're in the minority in this thread.

You are very good at ignoring the parts of posts you don't want to read.

Piers Morgan has said racist things. I provided many tweets earlier. He walked off set of his show (unprecedented even in his career of tantrums!) when chastised by a black man. He also has a vendetta against a biracial woman that is far out of proportion to anything she has done. It is REASONABLE for people to then put two and two together to assume that his racist comments imply that he is racist and therefore his vendetta against the black woman has racist roots but because he is a not unintelligent guy, he has managed to not 'say the quiet part out loud' so to speak in his rants about her.

That is a reasonable logical leap. You have not made a single comment to refute this other than to petulantly ask for something he SPECIFICALLY SAID ABOUT MM.

And additionally, it is Piers Morgan's FAULT that he is facing these charges. He has been so uniformly hateful that people think is is racist, a transphobe, a misogynist, anti muslim, everything. Your defense to this is, 'since he hates everyone, he can't be racist'. And I say to you, because he hates everyone, he is ALL OF THOSE THINGS.

Again, what I’m looking for is evidence that Piers was racist against Meghan. That’s all I’m looking for. Nothing else.

Again, people have ceded that he hasn't said that but concluded that the totality of his actions implies bias. You refuse to engage with this discussion in good faith.

So you feel like he was racist but don’t have proof?


Who cares what you think if you don’t have proof? I don’t know you. Maybe you have terrible judgment.

You did not find my proof compelling because you decided it was not proof. You need something explicit to consider it proof. That says something about your judgement.

Again, you always have the option of just telling us what Piers said about Meghan that was racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

DP. Exactly. She doesn’t need to stay in touch with him.

But the fact that they aren’t buddies anymore isn’t because of racism.

They aren’t friends anymore because she chose to not be his friend.

His rants about her is racism.

Would you mind please specifying the racism? Just if you could, please show us how Piers was racist against Meghan. Thanks.

\

I am the poster who thinks he's misogynistic who you are happy with because I'm 'reasonable' I guess and we're in the minority in this thread.

You are very good at ignoring the parts of posts you don't want to read.

Piers Morgan has said racist things. I provided many tweets earlier. He walked off set of his show (unprecedented even in his career of tantrums!) when chastised by a black man. He also has a vendetta against a biracial woman that is far out of proportion to anything she has done. It is REASONABLE for people to then put two and two together to assume that his racist comments imply that he is racist and therefore his vendetta against the black woman has racist roots but because he is a not unintelligent guy, he has managed to not 'say the quiet part out loud' so to speak in his rants about her.

That is a reasonable logical leap. You have not made a single comment to refute this other than to petulantly ask for something he SPECIFICALLY SAID ABOUT MM.

And additionally, it is Piers Morgan's FAULT that he is facing these charges. He has been so uniformly hateful that people think is is racist, a transphobe, a misogynist, anti muslim, everything. Your defense to this is, 'since he hates everyone, he can't be racist'. And I say to you, because he hates everyone, he is ALL OF THOSE THINGS.

Again, what I’m looking for is evidence that Piers was racist against Meghan. That’s all I’m looking for. Nothing else.

Again, people have ceded that he hasn't said that but concluded that the totality of his actions implies bias. You refuse to engage with this discussion in good faith.

So you feel like he was racist but don’t have proof?


Who cares what you think if you don’t have proof? I don’t know you. Maybe you have terrible judgment.

You did not find my proof compelling because you decided it was not proof. You need something explicit to consider it proof. That says something about your judgement.

Again, you always have the option of just telling us what Piers said about Meghan that was racist.

And you have the option of intellectually engaging with what I actually said instead of ignoring it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So funny to see white people debate what qualifies as racist. Y'all are cute, lol.

Not so funny to see an assumption that everyone commenting here is white. Maybe check yourself.

Lady, please. You're white and most of these posters are white. Stop playing (?) dumb.

🙄I get that this is the internet, but you’ve just taken your assumptions from ignorant to offensive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

DP. Exactly. She doesn’t need to stay in touch with him.

But the fact that they aren’t buddies anymore isn’t because of racism.

They aren’t friends anymore because she chose to not be his friend.

His rants about her is racism.

Would you mind please specifying the racism? Just if you could, please show us how Piers was racist against Meghan. Thanks.

Consistently denigrating the only royal that is a POC, instead of the pedo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

DP. Exactly. She doesn’t need to stay in touch with him.

But the fact that they aren’t buddies anymore isn’t because of racism.

They aren’t friends anymore because she chose to not be his friend.

His rants about her is racism.

Would you mind please specifying the racism? Just if you could, please show us how Piers was racist against Meghan. Thanks.

Consistently denigrating the only royal that is a POC, instead of the pedo.

Maybe Piers is friends with Andrew. Or maybe Piers is also a pedophile. There are plenty of explanations that don’t involve racism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

I have no idea. But, if she ghosted him, that says a lot about her character.

Why? They had drinks together, they weren’t even friends. Why does she need to stay in touch with him. Are we all obligated to be friends with everybody we have met?

DP. Exactly. She doesn’t need to stay in touch with him.

But the fact that they aren’t buddies anymore isn’t because of racism.

They aren’t friends anymore because she chose to not be his friend.

His rants about her is racism.

Would you mind please specifying the racism? Just if you could, please show us how Piers was racist against Meghan. Thanks.

Consistently denigrating the only royal that is a POC, instead of the pedo.

Maybe Piers is friends with Andrew. Or maybe Piers is also a pedophile. There are plenty of explanations that don’t involve racism.

Could you provide proof Piers is a pedophile? That seems like a worse thing to be accused of than racism.

[Anonymous]

Oh yeah Sharon's definitely an innocent delicate flower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh yeah Sharon's definitely an innocent delicate flower.

I've never understood why Sharon's even a "thing" aside from being married to Ozzy.

[Anonymous]

If I started calling your husband a rapist and you asked for proof, would "we all just know he is" be ok?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I started calling your husband a rapist and you asked for proof, would "we all just know he is" be ok?

False equivalence
Not the same
MOVING ON

[Anonymous]

Does anyone really care about Sharon Osbourne? She is only known because she is married to Ozzy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the thing with Piers is Meghan sought out his friendship when she first went to the uk as an adult (and an actress) and then after meeting Harry she ghosted him.

I think a lot of his ire is personal.

You think she is the only woman that has turned Piers down?

I believe he is happily married?
I think it's more than that - she approached him and he has a sense of huge self importance, to be dismissed in any social capacity is a big blow to his ego.
That's my theory anyway.

Um, you are wrong. People have been posting Piers' old tweets all over SM. He admittedly started following MM after seeing her on Suits. He said he loved watching the show because of her. His exposed tweets show how he dipped into her DM's and asked to meet her. There was another tweet or instagram post where he lamented just meeting her but somehow the schedule was off. When she was going to London to see Harry, she texted him and told him she would be in town and they could meet then. Piers posted that he finally met MM and then he walked her outside to the car where she went off to see Harry. Of course, he did not know at the time it was Harry she was going to meet. So according to Piers on SM he followed her and met her that one time. He is a freaking weirdo.