I always think that part of the reason my friends with large families skip some stuff is that they have older kids along with the younger kids and therefore a different perspective on the “defining soccer game.” |
Exactly. |
RE: Missing a game not being a big deal
Maybe not from your perspective but think of the kids who go to every game. When a few kids miss the "defining" game it sucks for the other kids. My son has to play the whole game and not get any breaks through subs because your kid wasn't there. So they end up losing because the other team has more kids who can play fresh. If you sign up and commit to something, you should go unless you are sick or there was a true emergency. It's not fair to everyone else. |
If only there were a way not to open posts that don’t interest you. Like if there are words in the title that you claim not to like... |
I’m not that poster but it is incredibly common. A theme I’m noticing in this thread is that the parents with the larger families are prioritizing the family as a whole over the interests and/or needs of any particular child. That may be the mentality that leads to the larger families in the first place. But you better believe that if you are an eight-year-old who loves travel soccer and you get cut from that top team because your parents don’t make getting you there a priority, and then you see your former teammates in their higher- level uniforms, you’re going to feel sad. That’s not being a crazy sports parent. It’s taking your kids’ needs as individuals into account. |
Forget the stupid soccer game comment. Imagine you’re the one kid whose parents couldn’t get it together to help with your diorama on science day. Or forgot to print out the lyrics when everyone else knew the class song. It’s not about sports. |
I never thought of it this way. The OP is right. Clearly this child on your sons team should never have been born. |
If only there was a way to avoid people that complain and make you annoyed with them. Like walking away, changing the subject, or hanging out with other people (those who don't complain or those who don't have large families that apparently bother you). |
I'm not convinced that happens. Gentle tip from a mother of many: you aren't doing your kid a favor by doing his diorama. The teacher knows you did it. My kids are responsible for their own school work. I'm only responsible for purchasing the supplies. Teachers consistently compliment my kid for doing his own projects (and they comment to me as well). The sports example is legit precisely because most parents realize there is no such thing as a defining swim meet or soccer game. |
No one is talking about doing it for them. I literally saw this happen in second grade this year. Someone needs to get the shoebox and the supplies. These kids are seven years old. If the parent forgets it really sucks for them when every kid pops out of the car at drop off and they don’t have one.. No one is talking about doing the work instead of the kid. I’m not sure why you are insisting that this doesn’t happen when numerous posters are saying they see it regularly. |
So nothing they do is important, even if it’s important to them? Got it. |
I have an only child (desperately trying for #2 but probably not in the cards for us) and hearing parents of large families complain about logistics doesn't bother me. I know it is hard to be in 3 different places at once - my parents had to juggle a large family. I don't think the kids are "missing out" by not being able to attend a few things here or there.
Everyone is trying their best and sometimes it can get stressful - whether you have one kid or 5. I wish we could all keep this in mind before attacking eachother. |
So dramatic. Question: how on earth are you equipped to judge what is important to my kid? You simply aren't. Just because your kid believes the soccer game is a defining moment in his life doesn't mean my kid feels the same. Geez. Another parenting tip: putting so much emphasis and pressure on an 8 year old won't end well...whether it's soccer or social studies. |
I grew up Mormon and have dozens of friends and family members with 5+ kids. Literally all of them tell me that 3 is when the dynamic shifts. With one or two the family can carry on in a way that is still largely about the parents’ preferences. With 3, you switch into being in kid mode 100% of the time. With 2, you can micromanage them. With 3, one of them at all times will be at least somewhat outside your sphere of supervision and influence. And if you are the right kind of family, you will quickly see that centering your life on the kids and backing off and letting them be more independent is actually better for everyone involved. I think the problem comes because a lot of people don’t perceive a family of three as being a lot of kids, so they go for one more but they are not mentally prepared to make that shift. So instead of leaning into the big-family dynamic, they fight against it and try to run their family of three the same way that they ran their family of two. Since that’s not really possible, they feel like they are in over their heads and are constantly stressed and flustered.
Basically, IMO, the families who are on the fence about 2 vs. 3 are usually happier with 2, but the families who are on the fence about 3 vs 4 are happy and capable with 4. |
Who's putting pressure on kids? Interests and enthusiasm isn't the same as pressure. You're SO defensive and taking this all so personally. If you can handle your large family in the way you think best, great! Then move along. |