Why do women let motherhood destroy their marriages...

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I will never understand the concept of it wanting children. I do understand that some people simply can't have them. But children are so far and away the best thing to ever happen to me


Believe it or not, not everybody is just like you!
Anonymous
I feel like a lot of undesirable women attempt to compete with more desirable women on the basis of "I'll always remain into sex! I won't put anything, even kids, before you! Hell, I won't even ask for kids! Please want me!! We can be each other's soulmates!"

Puke.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Women don't marry for love, they marry for the paycheck the man can provide and babies.


You don't need a husband to have either of these things. Why bother?
Anonymous
Because once the kids reach the age of survivability, there is no biological imperative to keep you around. In fact, we need a new partner to diversify the gene pool. Feel free to move on to do the same.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women don't marry for love, they marry for the paycheck the man can provide and babies.


You don't need a husband to have either of these things. Why bother?

It's the easiest way to get those things. However, most women don't foresee the headaches it comes with lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I feel like a lot of undesirable women attempt to compete with more desirable women on the basis of "I'll always remain into sex! I won't put anything, even kids, before you! Hell, I won't even ask for kids! Please want me!! We can be each other's soulmates!"

Puke.


You've just turned that undesirable woman into a desirable one.
Anonymous
I think it's an easy way to cop out of the world. I am not talking all women but some find it easier to live just for their kids. It makes life easy and no one gives you a quarterly review on how you are raising your kids and you can be a martyr.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Cause women figure out that besides being a sperm donar men aren't necessary.


Nope. They want you to remain a money donor - especially after they've lost interest in your sperm.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Because once the kids reach the age of survivability, there is no biological imperative to keep you around. In fact, we need a new partner to diversify the gene pool. Feel free to move on to do the same.


The biological imperative is to raise the existing kids to successful, stable adulthood so that they reproduce. As a woman, you need the man for this much more than he needs you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Women don't marry for love, they marry for the paycheck the man can provide and babies.


You don't need a husband to have either of these things. Why bother?


If you have babies without a man around, you're signing up to do a shitload of work all by yourself. Not a good idea.

And that leaves aside the fact that kids are much better off raised by their mother and father.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because once the kids reach the age of survivability, there is no biological imperative to keep you around. In fact, we need a new partner to diversify the gene pool. Feel free to move on to do the same.


The biological imperative is to raise the existing kids to successful, stable adulthood so that they reproduce. As a woman, you need the man for this much more than he needs you.

There is no biological imperative for "successful and stable". These are manmade constructs. The bar to ensure children survive until they are old enough to procreate is a pretty low one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because once the kids reach the age of survivability, there is no biological imperative to keep you around. In fact, we need a new partner to diversify the gene pool. Feel free to move on to do the same.


The biological imperative is to raise the existing kids to successful, stable adulthood so that they reproduce. As a woman, you need the man for this much more than he needs you.


You're confused. Mother nature doesn't care about your success lol does your uterus work? Good enough.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like a lot of undesirable women attempt to compete with more desirable women on the basis of "I'll always remain into sex! I won't put anything, even kids, before you! Hell, I won't even ask for kids! Please want me!! We can be each other's soulmates!"

Puke.


You've just turned that undesirable woman into a desirable one.


Have fun going extinct together then!
Anonymous
Haha your wife's probably posting on that thread about happy marriages. Delusional women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because once the kids reach the age of survivability, there is no biological imperative to keep you around. In fact, we need a new partner to diversify the gene pool. Feel free to move on to do the same.


The biological imperative is to raise the existing kids to successful, stable adulthood so that they reproduce. As a woman, you need the man for this much more than he needs you.


You're confused. Mother nature doesn't care about your success lol does your uterus work? Good enough.


She does care about success. Otherwise you'd just walk away from the baby the instant you gave birth.
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: