|
Yet we are here complaining about other families for not wanting to swallow the mess created by MCPS and BOE.
|
It’s sickening to see them saying MCPS is just being MCPS and you should just shut up and swallow whatever MCPS gives you. |
Thank you!!! |
| The issue is that MCPS is using Wootton to fix a planning error, instead of addressing Wootton’s long-neglected building and the system’s forecasting mistakes |
Just replace the word Wootton with SSIMS and see if that matters to you or not. |
You can complain, but at the end of the day, the most logical choice is to close Wootton for now. MoCo doesn't have the budget to fix all of the crumbling schools and open a brand new school even as enrollments are declining. I highly recommend you run for the BOE or County Council. I'd love to see some new management. |
|
Thank you for advocating for MCPS and its management! Surely they will appreciate it. For those who complains, it is a hard job to do. If you don’t like it, come and be on the BOE. The current members can just move on to their next position, like Shebra Evans, at-large council member, and Julie Yang, running for county council.
|
The county is losing $800+ million in revenue over the next 6 years, enrollment is declining, and there is a brand new $300 million dollar high school 2.5 miles from one that needs to be torn down. In what universe do we build an additional $300 million dollar school under these circumstances? Was it bad planning? Yes. Was it preventable? Yes. But this is where we are today and dragging the county into more bonding when debt service is already a huge chunk of the budget is not the solution. Nor is raising income tax or property tax unless you want middle-class and upper-middle class homeowners to revolt. It’s not ideal but it’s the best of a bunch of bad options and personally, it’s the first time I can recall MCPS actually proposing something practical rather than aspirational since the Great Recession. |
I don’t disagree that the county faces major fiscal pressure — but that’s exactly why we need better planning, not short-term fixes that create bigger long-term problems. Moving an entire cluster into Crown is not a cost-saving plan; it’s a way of avoiding the consequences of past planning mistakes, and it doesn’t actually eliminate the need to rebuild Wootton. The building will not magically fix itself simply because its students are reassigned. Whether Wootton is occupied or not, MCPS will still eventually have to address a failing facility, and pushing that cost down the road does not make it go away. |
And this is the context where the regional model is in the "plan" to waste another 10-20 million dollars per year until CO/BOE acknowledges the failure. With the current election and tenure mechanisms of BOE and superintendent with absolutely zero accountability from management, there will never be a good planning to "prevent" waste of millions to billions of tax payer money. |
| There are MANY schools in this situation that are not on the list for repairs. Wootton has so much more as it is than other schools and is being offered a brand new school, most of us would be thrilled to have, and yet, nothing is good enough. If MCPS caves, how would this work as you'd still have to go to a holding school or have it done while the kids are in school, meaning that you lose athletic and other areas to make it work. |
I don't believe it was bad planning, but rather intentional neglect. Wootton could have been renovated over the past 10+ years - and parents have loudly complained about MCPS' failure to do so. Moving students from Wootton to another school was always the plan (hence numerous boundary studies over the years). MCPS achieved indirectly what it wanted to do directly. |
Why rebuild Wootton at all? Why not just demolish the outdated building? With declining enrollment, it doesn’t seem necessary to keep both Wootton and Crown.
|
Isn't the idea that the old Wootton building would become a secondary holding school? |