Potentially, most of the county. Of course, the tyrrany of the majority was among the reasons the Founding Fathers were skeptical of pure democracy. Certainly, the relative impacts should be considered. In the end, however, the decision-making criteria should boil down to providing individuals across the system with reasonably similar overall educational experiences, from courses available to facility conditions to extracurriculars to transportation and beyond, though taken as a whole, as making all, or even any, of these exactly equal for everyone would be hugely inefficient, if not impossible. The closer they can get to a point where people, generally, wouldn't care to which MCPS school their children would be zoned, the more they would know that they are heading in the right direction. Of course, with respect to this, I have my doubts concerning the intentions of some of the decision makers, from MCPS leadership to BOE members to those on the County Council. We shall see. |
The only people who don’t care what school their kids are zoned for are people who don’t care about their kid’s education/very specific other reasons. This isn’t a moco thing. Everywhere in the country people are very careful where they settle in terms of schools. Literally everyone I personally know has never rented or purchased a property without considering the schools. There is not a place in this country where people aren’t considering where a property is in regards to schools-this is not an attainable goal. The only people who don’t care about it are: 1. those that simply don’t have a choice where they live. 2. Those who do not care at all about their kid’s education. 3. Those who don’t know any better themselves so don’t think there is a difference. 4. Those coming from areas so unbelievably bad that literally anything is a huge upgrade. |
We don’t care within reason as the teacher quality is more important and we wanted to balance college and grade school savings and making sure we could comfortably pay for both. There are problems at all schools. Many of us know the weaknesses of mcps and have supplemented from the start. We first did it ourselves and now tutors. We pay for outside sports and arts and private lessons for those too. Our kids are academically ahead. The only issues we have are the lack of course offerings as mine are at the highest levels in the earlier grades. You can dismiss families like us but let’s be real, it’s about your ego and wanting to think if you pay more your kids will and should get more. Fundraise for the repairs. Simple. |
And, why is it these lower income families are good enough to teach, provide mental health treatment and support your kids at school and then you claim theses are the same people who don’t value education. If they don’t value education why do you allow them to teach your kids? |
Do you know what is considered lower income in moco? Because it’s not a teacher’s salary. Also every single teacher I know (and I know a lot because i’m in the education field-though not a teacher) Has their kid in a high performing school (even if they don’t teach at one) or has them in private if their school is not a good one. Tons of the teachers I know live in the Poolesville cluster-affordable housing and excellent schools. |
This is and always has been unrealistic. Educational experiences are dictated by parental involvement in their kids' education, combined with the teachers in the classroom. Parents will want to live in safe neighborhoods among those of the same socioeconomic class. The best teachers will want to work at the best schools. The best schools are filled with kids (and their parents) who want to maximize their educational experience. The intentions of MCPS are hidden by design, often disguised by the amorphous (and unverifiable) claim that they are acting in the best interests of all kids in MCPS. The more parents whose kids will be affected negatively by an MCPS decision, the less likely this justification is correct. Simple logic dictates that no decision should have a disproportionate negative affect on one group. Here, it's in the best interest of MCPS to keep Wootton as a high-performing school in the neighborhood where it has been for 55 years. OTOH, it's clearly in the best interest of the developers around Crown to move Wootton there so that they can charge 50%+ for their rental apartments and townhouses within walking distance of Crown. |
You need to get out of your bubble. If they do, they have a high earning spouse or did a cosa to that school. |
How about we close a school you look down on and give your wealthy school their entire funding allocation to make it the greatest school ever as only your kids deserve it, not ours? Wait, that wouldn’t satisfy you either. Wootton has it all so demanding more when other schools are going without speaks volumes. I doubt every child at Wootton is uber smart and graduating with MVC or higher. |
And, nothing wrong with diversity in the schools. You realize those apartments are where county workers and MCPS staff can live to serve you, many of whom have masters degrees but choose a lower paying profession to serve your family and instead of welcoming them you make them unwanted. Nice. You make Wootton sound terrible. |
|
You can get a house for $800 for Wootton. Many other areas go for way more. What’s there to brag about? https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/14908-Pomquay-Ct_North-Potomac_MD_20878_M57729-79418?from=srp-list-card
Is a family living here not welcome too? Or you tolerate them? https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/14425-Pebble-Hill-Ln_North-Potomac_MD_20878_M59698-18126?from=srp-list-card |
Who is bragging? There has been comment after comment explaining that Wootton parents (including myself) are in no way rich and simply stretched to be able to provide our children with a great school experience. That being said-we absolutely could not have afforded a house that would have worked for our family in The Whitman cluster. The rich aren’t buying in Wootton. We simply don’t want our school moved and changed-and it will be changed. It’s funny because if you were to give this option to Most any other school they would also oppose-but for some reason Wootton parents are being attacked for this ridiculous option that came out of nowhere. The only people who want it are the people that will directly benefit from their property value increase-that’s it. |
Wow, so eloquently stated. Why is it dumb? Putting Wootton kids at Crown is just smart, and a good use of taxpayer dollars. There are 22 schools in the CIP, and only one with a brand new school being built a couple of miles away. |
I asked this question a few pages back. In Option H, RM is suddenly at or under capacity. Is that what MCPS is projecting? Is this due to the regional models? Can someone from MCPS please explain the change in projections? |
You have made this exact same comment like 4 times in this forum on different threads. I know you think it makes you sound smart but it doesn’t. This was an MCPS mistake that they want Wootton to absorb. |
1. What nefarious reason to you believe they have? 2. Almost EVERY decision has more of a negative *effect* on one group than another. That is politics. That is life. |