Trump Baby Bonus

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want a higher birth rate, baby bonuses don’t work. They need to address the housing problem, the economic uncertainty, and the unavailability of daycare/expense of daycare. Men also need to modernize their approach to marriage and family. (Gift article)

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/21/us/politics/baby-bonuses-fertility-planning-trump-aides-assess-ideas-to-boost-birthrate.html?unlocked_article_code=1.BU8.NtkN.WagWczUEi5e6&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Their plan is to impoverish most of us, so Peter Thiel and friends can have it all. Their cult leader, Curtis Yarvin, suggested that poor people be turned into biofuel.

You have good points, but they have no interest in doing anything you suggest. They do not want to be helpful.

You describe Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum.

“Let them eat ze bugs.”

“You will own nothing, and you will be happy.”

Y’all can shove it.

haha that's the maga line now! didn't you get the memo? it's good for prices to go up because it means you will consume less and something something success.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few dcurbanmom-type blue enclaves, married parents tend to be Republicans and single moms tend to be Democrats.

This post brought to you from PP’s @$$. It was pulled straight from it.

Democrats hate voter stats, because they don’t support Democrat delusions of grandeur. The Democrats are overwhelmingly favored by inner city folks, unemployed folks, welfare folks, LGBTQIA+ folks, and yes, unwed single mothers. And yet the party still lost. Because married, employed homeowners outside of a few blue city areas overwhelmingly vote Republican. This doesn’t “feel” good to dcurbanmom types, so most deliberately avoid voter statistics and remain blissfully unaware of them by choice.

The problem is that a good part of eligible age voters don’t vote. Also Democrats have to appeal to more interest because people are single issue voters which is ridiculous

Again it’s hard for preening Democrats to face the truth. Actually, voter turnout has surged much higher because of Trump. Trump, Biden, and Harris are the biggest vote getters BY FAR in American history, with their tens of millions of extra votes vs the Clintons, Obamas, and Bushes of the world MUCH larger in percentage terms than the modest increase in eligible voters. And the biggest single issue voters BY FAR are pro-choice Democratic women. Most women I know from my prestigious college are single issue abortion voters.

Remember when Biden said his hands were tied and there was nothing he could do about the southern border ???

137,000 - march 2024
7,000 - march 2025
95% decrease in apprehensions at the southern border

https://x.com/piersmorgan/status/1912159030358798546?s=46

How many other issues were the same ? With Biden ignoring them unable to figure out what to do????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few dcurbanmom-type blue enclaves, married parents tend to be Republicans and single moms tend to be Democrats.

This post brought to you from PP’s @$$. It was pulled straight from it.

LOL....I always wonder if it's same dp all over the political pages spewing their ignorance.

[Anonymous]

There would have to be a cultural change as well as an economic one. Of course money is a factor, but plenty of people just don’t want to, and now that we don’t all live on farms where you need children, on an individual scale nobody “needs” to have a child. having a family is a want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s fine, the voters are who they are. I just think it’s funny that dcurbanmom types cling to the myth that Democrats are on average more intelligent, better educated, and higher income than Republicans when the opposite is true.

dcurbanmom Dems want to imagine themselves as fancy moral crusaders who are only losing to Trump because of a few redneck bad apples, instead of facing the fact that, Democrats are voting AGAINST most employed married homeowners and WITH the unemployed, the ex-cons, the single moms, and the childless LGBTQIA+ obsessives.

After Republicans win the Presidency again in 2028, a non-trivial number of power- and status-seeking dcurbanmoms will switch parties. But for now, they are in a funny #resistance and delusion bubble.

I’m actually very surprised that republicans are not campaigning more on the homeownership topic. They should emphasize that democrats want to destroy your neighborhood and community. They want to eliminate single family neighborhoods and force high density development in your community . They want to force everyone to live in tiny apartments and take the metro to work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s fine, the voters are who they are. I just think it’s funny that dcurbanmom types cling to the myth that Democrats are on average more intelligent, better educated, and higher income than Republicans when the opposite is true.

dcurbanmom Dems want to imagine themselves as fancy moral crusaders who are only losing to Trump because of a few redneck bad apples, instead of facing the fact that, Democrats are voting AGAINST most employed married homeowners and WITH the unemployed, the ex-cons, the single moms, and the childless LGBTQIA+ obsessives.

After Republicans win the Presidency again in 2028, a non-trivial number of power- and status-seeking dcurbanmoms will switch parties. But for now, they are in a funny #resistance and delusion bubble.

I’m actually very surprised that republicans are not campaigning more on the homeownership topic. They should emphasize that democrats want to destroy your neighborhood and community. They want to eliminate single family neighborhoods and force high density development in your community . They want to force everyone to live in tiny apartments and take the metro to work.

This only works in places that are already super high density anyway. Also we are one of the few countries in the world where everyone just expects to live in big houses on their own massive patch of land.

[Anonymous]

This is the weirdest idea coming from the party that accuses people on Medicaid of having more babies just for the money and wishing they could be sterilized.

And it’s creepy and weird for every other reason too.

Having kids is a luxury. Make life affordable and people will have kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s fine, the voters are who they are. I just think it’s funny that dcurbanmom types cling to the myth that Democrats are on average more intelligent, better educated, and higher income than Republicans when the opposite is true.

dcurbanmom Dems want to imagine themselves as fancy moral crusaders who are only losing to Trump because of a few redneck bad apples, instead of facing the fact that, Democrats are voting AGAINST most employed married homeowners and WITH the unemployed, the ex-cons, the single moms, and the childless LGBTQIA+ obsessives.

After Republicans win the Presidency again in 2028, a non-trivial number of power- and status-seeking dcurbanmoms will switch parties. But for now, they are in a funny #resistance and delusion bubble.

I’m actually very surprised that republicans are not campaigning more on the homeownership topic. They should emphasize that democrats want to destroy your neighborhood and community. They want to eliminate single family neighborhoods and force high density development in your community . They want to force everyone to live in tiny apartments and take the metro to work.

This only works in places that are already super high density anyway. Also we are one of the few countries in the world where everyone just expects to live in big houses on their own massive patch of land.

So taking metro is bad but moving people miles and hours away from work and then requiring them to commons good? No mention of the health or family impacts nor environmental impacts. Also do Democrats want everyone to live in tiny apartments or are they recognizing that not everyone wants to live in a McMansion nor can everyone afford to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s fine, the voters are who they are. I just think it’s funny that dcurbanmom types cling to the myth that Democrats are on average more intelligent, better educated, and higher income than Republicans when the opposite is true.

dcurbanmom Dems want to imagine themselves as fancy moral crusaders who are only losing to Trump because of a few redneck bad apples, instead of facing the fact that, Democrats are voting AGAINST most employed married homeowners and WITH the unemployed, the ex-cons, the single moms, and the childless LGBTQIA+ obsessives.

After Republicans win the Presidency again in 2028, a non-trivial number of power- and status-seeking dcurbanmoms will switch parties. But for now, they are in a funny #resistance and delusion bubble.

I’m actually very surprised that republicans are not campaigning more on the homeownership topic. They should emphasize that democrats want to destroy your neighborhood and community. They want to eliminate single family neighborhoods and force high density development in your community . They want to force everyone to live in tiny apartments and take the metro to work.

This only works in places that are already super high density anyway. Also we are one of the few countries in the world where everyone just expects to live in big houses on their own massive patch of land.

So taking metro is bad but moving people miles and hours away from work and then requiring them to commons good? No mention of the health or family impacts nor environmental impacts. Also do Democrats want everyone to live in tiny apartments or are they recognizing that not everyone wants to live in a McMansion nor can everyone afford to?

PP and I was agreeing with this concept. It’s becoming unrealistic for everyone to get a big house and a lot of land. Middle class in Asia and Europe get along just fine raising families in apartments. The average person is simply getting priced out of single family living near urban areas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s fine, the voters are who they are. I just think it’s funny that dcurbanmom types cling to the myth that Democrats are on average more intelligent, better educated, and higher income than Republicans when the opposite is true.

dcurbanmom Dems want to imagine themselves as fancy moral crusaders who are only losing to Trump because of a few redneck bad apples, instead of facing the fact that, Democrats are voting AGAINST most employed married homeowners and WITH the unemployed, the ex-cons, the single moms, and the childless LGBTQIA+ obsessives.

After Republicans win the Presidency again in 2028, a non-trivial number of power- and status-seeking dcurbanmoms will switch parties. But for now, they are in a funny #resistance and delusion bubble.

I’m actually very surprised that republicans are not campaigning more on the homeownership topic. They should emphasize that democrats want to destroy your neighborhood and community. They want to eliminate single family neighborhoods and force high density development in your community . They want to force everyone to live in tiny apartments and take the metro to work.

This only works in places that are already super high density anyway. Also we are one of the few countries in the world where everyone just expects to live in big houses on their own massive patch of land.

So taking metro is bad but moving people miles and hours away from work and then requiring them to commons good? No mention of the health or family impacts nor environmental impacts. Also do Democrats want everyone to live in tiny apartments or are they recognizing that not everyone wants to live in a McMansion nor can everyone afford to?

PP and I was agreeing with this concept. It’s becoming unrealistic for everyone to get a big house and a lot of land. Middle class in Asia and Europe get along just fine raising families in apartments. The average person is simply getting priced out of single family living near urban areas.

Not unrealistic at all. The US has a lot of undeveloped land and reducing minimum lot sizes but maintaining single family song could make a big difference. The fertility rates in Asia and Europe are even worse. The TFR for South Korea is .75. In China it is around 1.0 and in Japan it is 1.16. Spain and Italy are around 1.2. The total TFR for the EU as a whole is only 1.38. High density housing destroys the fertility rate and apartments are inherently unfriendly to having children. Policies that promote high density apartment development will make humans go extinct. https://x.com/morebirths/status/1875755100817268895?s=46

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s fine, the voters are who they are. I just think it’s funny that dcurbanmom types cling to the myth that Democrats are on average more intelligent, better educated, and higher income than Republicans when the opposite is true.

dcurbanmom Dems want to imagine themselves as fancy moral crusaders who are only losing to Trump because of a few redneck bad apples, instead of facing the fact that, Democrats are voting AGAINST most employed married homeowners and WITH the unemployed, the ex-cons, the single moms, and the childless LGBTQIA+ obsessives.

After Republicans win the Presidency again in 2028, a non-trivial number of power- and status-seeking dcurbanmoms will switch parties. But for now, they are in a funny #resistance and delusion bubble.

I’m actually very surprised that republicans are not campaigning more on the homeownership topic. They should emphasize that democrats want to destroy your neighborhood and community. They want to eliminate single family neighborhoods and force high density development in your community . They want to force everyone to live in tiny apartments and take the metro to work.

This only works in places that are already super high density anyway. Also we are one of the few countries in the world where everyone just expects to live in big houses on their own massive patch of land.

So taking metro is bad but moving people miles and hours away from work and then requiring them to commons good? No mention of the health or family impacts nor environmental impacts. Also do Democrats want everyone to live in tiny apartments or are they recognizing that not everyone wants to live in a McMansion nor can everyone afford to?

Their YIMBY Democrat policies effectively force most people to live in apartments by reducing the supply of single family homes and making them unaffordable. They also promote absurd anti-family policies like road diets, eliminating parking minimums, prioritizing bike lanes over cars, single stair reform without requiring elevators in buildings. All of these things don’t work for someone who wants kids especially if you want multiple kids. It’s completely impractical and unrealistic for someone to pick up their 4 kids from school on a bike and then pick up a week worth groceries from Costco for their family of 6. Then struggle to find parking for their minivan before walking up 3 flights of stairs in their single stair apartment building that doesn’t have an elevator.

[Anonymous]

As it anyone didn't know, this proves that the whole immigrant thing is just racism. More babies mess more people taking your jobs and lowering wages for fruit picking and landscaping and meatpacking and cleaning.

[Anonymous]

We could just use that money to feed, clothe, and provide medical care for existing children. It would certainly motivate people to have children if we didn’t live in such a far right $hithole of a country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It would certainly motivate people to have children if we didn’t live in such a far right $hithole of a country.

Are you closer to Dulles, Reagan or BWI?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of a few dcurbanmom-type blue enclaves, married parents tend to be Republicans and single moms tend to be Democrats.

This post brought to you from PP’s @$$. It was pulled straight from it.

Democrats hate voter stats, because they don’t support Democrat delusions of grandeur. The Democrats are overwhelmingly favored by inner city folks, unemployed folks, welfare folks, LGBTQIA+ folks, and yes, unwed single mothers. And yet the party still lost. Because married, employed homeowners outside of a few blue city areas overwhelmingly vote Republican. This doesn’t “feel” good to dcurbanmom types, so most deliberately avoid voter statistics and remain blissfully unaware of them by choice.

The problem is that a good part of eligible age voters don’t vote. Also Democrats have to appeal to more interest because people are single issue voters which is ridiculous

Again it’s hard for preening Democrats to face the truth. Actually, voter turnout has surged much higher because of Trump. Trump, Biden, and Harris are the biggest vote getters BY FAR in American history, with their tens of millions of extra votes vs the Clintons, Obamas, and Bushes of the world MUCH larger in percentage terms than the modest increase in eligible voters. And the biggest single issue voters BY FAR are pro-choice Democratic women. Most women I know from my prestigious college are single issue abortion voters.

Yes, The disdain for Trump and Biden caused voter turnout to surge to record numbers. People are more motivated to vote by hate and dislike than anything else. Is this what we want in American politics? Is this good for the country? No and No.