An "auto admit" is not even wise or desirable. Help your student find a place they can thrive while actually in attendance. Just getting in is not the goal |
Tufts acceptance rate is 13% and Emory is 14%. Why would anyone be an auto-admit? |
| Auto-admit to me is ASU where they literally auto-admit based on grades and scores. |
Come on, seriously? I'm guessing it's one of the other schools....the GDS admits last year (and this year, from what I've heard) are pretty great... |
Ok, "auto admit" was a poor choice of words and is obviously rankling some people. My point was just that good, but not tippy top, schools that strong Big 3 students were accepted at regularly a few years ago are now seeing many, many deferrals. These threads always imply that Big 3 parents have their panties in a bunch because their special snowflake is not getting into Yale. That is absolutely not what's happening, by and large. Most Big 3 parents send their kids to these schools because they believe in the education. But is it hard to see your kid work herself to the bone for four years and get deferred from Wisconsin when her neighbor down the street -- an equally smart, engaging and accomplished kid -- who did minimal work at Wilson gets in. By the way, my kids are in early HS and MS, so I'm just sharing experiences of friends and am looking ahead for my own kids. |
Thanks for saying what you really wanted to say out loud. |
| This doesn't sound broken it sounds more like a meritocracy overall rather than giving certain private schools a shorter inner lap - if the wilson kid is "equally smart etc.." why should your Big 3 kid get in ahead of them? |
Ah, so my guess at what I thought you were implying (that somebody is taking your kid’s spot and displacing them) is correct. Those darn lazy public school kids. |
Ok, but the reason I quoted those acceptance rates is to show that this isn’t about private school or public school kids. It’s about the fact that acceptance rates have plummeted — and basically become more random — over the past few years. For everyone. |
If only admissions would require people take a test that only wealthy people could afford to prep for... |
Maybe colleges know that the equally smart and accomplished Wilson kid doesn’t come with the huge sense of entitlement… |
+1 all they have is a dozen AP scores to go with near perfect GPAs in addition to the same ECs your kid has |
No - that's not my opinion. I'm saying there are SOME other non-athletic extra curricular pursuits that are equally time consuming and competitive to excel in but are not given the hook that a recruited athlete does. I know why that is (value of sports in this culture) and I'm not arguing against that. But I'm saying that even if your athlete has a + Y that they earned (vs a + Y of a VIP that was not earned) your kid is still getting some sort of a hook. (again - I said I'm ok with that hook but it's too bad others with hard earned special talents don't always have such fortune). I'm also adding that there are some athletes who have probably put in the same effort (maybe more) than the recruited athletes but don't have the talent to get them over the recruit line. |
You're gross. |
HOS shouldn't be flippant, nor should CCO. But it remains to be seen whether these deferrals will turn into acceptances in RD. It "could" be the case that schools have made a conscious shift from accepting affluent students in early rounds to remove the inequities that creates (especially in ED) for families that cannot afford to commit to a school without the need to compare financial packages. They may also want to remove those students from EA to hold them accountable to their senior year grades - or to do so against the entire RD group. My child is also in the deferral group - but we all need to wait it out to see where the chips land. These things are happening at all local DMV private schools (for those of you pointing to GDS success - they like other schools have many hooks associated with their admits) |