With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gosh people are mean. I like her show and In am not sure about a weave because she always had beautiful hair. I have gotten some nice cooking ideas and what is wrong with this! She is making things that non chefs can make so that is nice. Her style is beautiful. My only complaint is that she looks very thin and I am sure it is from stress so people be nice she is trying and actually working so remember she is not a princess who sits around.

Gosh calling someone out on being skinny isn’t really kind either. Good golly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is “stress from meanies” the generic name for Ozempic? Who called “fake eating disorder as a tribute to Diana”? Come get your prize!

Meghan and her weave have finally found the freedom to come full circle, like circling a drain, with this influencer stuff. Her instincts are so bad, Tina Brown called it right when saying Markle always gets it wrong. Affiliate links as an act of service, people! Thank goodness she’s worked out her trademark and supply chain issues by merching past-season clothes that can “sell out” since they’re not for sale. The Meghan effect! It’s the Midas touch. Or the mierda touch.

She’s trying to whore out her kids despite the privacy and security claims. You know, all the racists chasing down these visibly…uh…mixed kids. Yes. Their marriage seems super…healthy. She is an inspiration!

https://www.instagram.com/meghan/?ig_mid=6BCBF4B7-4CD6-4CE5-AAA2-CCE56AF2E814&utm_source=igweb

Affiliate links are an act of service…. That’s hilarious. Also they are clearly broke as this is so beneath who she thinks she is, Sussex and all. By broke I’m sure they have 10s of millions in the bank, but they are spending at least 10m a year on their security, mortgage, lifestyle, jets etc.

And why would Meghan Sussex include a “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” in big bold font at the top of her affiliate page? She knows the title is the only reason anyone pays attention.

In order to be Duchess of Sussex, don't you need to live in Sussex and lord over the people there???

The Prince of Wales spends as little time in Wales as possible, so I’d say no.

Steeeeee-retch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gosh people are mean. I like her show and In am not sure about a weave because she always had beautiful hair. I have gotten some nice cooking ideas and what is wrong with this! She is making things that non chefs can make so that is nice. Her style is beautiful. My only complaint is that she looks very thin and I am sure it is from stress so people be nice she is trying and actually working so remember she is not a princess who sits around.

Gosh calling someone out on being skinny isn’t really kind either. Good golly!

my comment came from a good place. She has lost a lot of weight since she met Harry. I am guessing it is because of stress so feels inauthentic not to mention this. Not saying anything about how she does her hair or make up. Just a concern for what looks like too much stress put on someone. I wish her well.

[Anonymous]

Is it true even Gwyneth Paltrow has taken potshots at Meghan for this awful show?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is “stress from meanies” the generic name for Ozempic? Who called “fake eating disorder as a tribute to Diana”? Come get your prize!

Meghan and her weave have finally found the freedom to come full circle, like circling a drain, with this influencer stuff. Her instincts are so bad, Tina Brown called it right when saying Markle always gets it wrong. Affiliate links as an act of service, people! Thank goodness she’s worked out her trademark and supply chain issues by merching past-season clothes that can “sell out” since they’re not for sale. The Meghan effect! It’s the Midas touch. Or the mierda touch.

She’s trying to whore out her kids despite the privacy and security claims. You know, all the racists chasing down these visibly…uh…mixed kids. Yes. Their marriage seems super…healthy. She is an inspiration!

https://www.instagram.com/meghan/?ig_mid=6BCBF4B7-4CD6-4CE5-AAA2-CCE56AF2E814&utm_source=igweb

Affiliate links are an act of service…. That’s hilarious. Also they are clearly broke as this is so beneath who she thinks she is, Sussex and all. By broke I’m sure they have 10s of millions in the bank, but they are spending at least 10m a year on their security, mortgage, lifestyle, jets etc.

And why would Meghan Sussex include a “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” in big bold font at the top of her affiliate page? She knows the title is the only reason anyone pays attention.

In order to be Duchess of Sussex, don't you need to live in Sussex and lord over the people there???

The Prince of Wales spends as little time in Wales as possible, so I’d say no.

Steeeeee-retch.

What about Cambridge?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it true even Gwyneth Paltrow has taken potshots at Meghan for this awful show?

In a Vanity Fair spread last week, Gwyneth said the following:

“I don’t know Meghan and Harry,” Paltrow says. I’m surprised, given how close they live. “I mean, I’ve met Meghan, who seems really lovely, but I don’t know her at all,” she clarifies. “Maybe I’ll try to get through their security detail and bring them a pie.” She hasn’t seen the trailer for Markle’s Netflix series, With Love, Meghan, either. Based on its fresh-veggie-filled emphasis on the good life, the show seems quite Goop-adjacent, but Paltrow is unthreatened. If anything, she’s inclined to defend the duchess: When “there’s noise about certain women in the culture, I do have, always, a strong instinct to stand up for them.”

That last line, especially, tells me that no, she isn’t taking potshots at MM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true even Gwyneth Paltrow has taken potshots at Meghan for this awful show?

In a Vanity Fair spread last week, Gwyneth said the following:

“I don’t know Meghan and Harry,” Paltrow says. I’m surprised, given how close they live. “I mean, I’ve met Meghan, who seems really lovely, but I don’t know her at all,” she clarifies. “Maybe I’ll try to get through their security detail and bring them a pie.” She hasn’t seen the trailer for Markle’s Netflix series, With Love, Meghan, either. Based on its fresh-veggie-filled emphasis on the good life, the show seems quite Goop-adjacent, but Paltrow is unthreatened. If anything, she’s inclined to defend the duchess: When “there’s noise about certain women in the culture, I do have, always, a strong instinct to stand up for them.”

That last line, especially, tells me that no, she isn’t taking potshots at MM.

I think it was the right amount of shade, with a nice general statement at the end. Goopy did live in England for years and she can do that subtle British passive aggressive fake gracious yet cutting thing really well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is “stress from meanies” the generic name for Ozempic? Who called “fake eating disorder as a tribute to Diana”? Come get your prize!

Meghan and her weave have finally found the freedom to come full circle, like circling a drain, with this influencer stuff. Her instincts are so bad, Tina Brown called it right when saying Markle always gets it wrong. Affiliate links as an act of service, people! Thank goodness she’s worked out her trademark and supply chain issues by merching past-season clothes that can “sell out” since they’re not for sale. The Meghan effect! It’s the Midas touch. Or the mierda touch.

She’s trying to whore out her kids despite the privacy and security claims. You know, all the racists chasing down these visibly…uh…mixed kids. Yes. Their marriage seems super…healthy. She is an inspiration!

https://www.instagram.com/meghan/?ig_mid=6BCBF4B7-4CD6-4CE5-AAA2-CCE56AF2E814&utm_source=igweb

Affiliate links are an act of service…. That’s hilarious. Also they are clearly broke as this is so beneath who she thinks she is, Sussex and all. By broke I’m sure they have 10s of millions in the bank, but they are spending at least 10m a year on their security, mortgage, lifestyle, jets etc.

And why would Meghan Sussex include a “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” in big bold font at the top of her affiliate page? She knows the title is the only reason anyone pays attention.

In order to be Duchess of Sussex, don't you need to live in Sussex and lord over the people there???

No you don't but if you don't endorse colonialism, birth right superiority privilege, slavery, racism etc, you should feel ashamed to use such titles. More so if you are part black and full American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is “stress from meanies” the generic name for Ozempic? Who called “fake eating disorder as a tribute to Diana”? Come get your prize!

Meghan and her weave have finally found the freedom to come full circle, like circling a drain, with this influencer stuff. Her instincts are so bad, Tina Brown called it right when saying Markle always gets it wrong. Affiliate links as an act of service, people! Thank goodness she’s worked out her trademark and supply chain issues by merching past-season clothes that can “sell out” since they’re not for sale. The Meghan effect! It’s the Midas touch. Or the mierda touch.

She’s trying to whore out her kids despite the privacy and security claims. You know, all the racists chasing down these visibly…uh…mixed kids. Yes. Their marriage seems super…healthy. She is an inspiration!

https://www.instagram.com/meghan/?ig_mid=6BCBF4B7-4CD6-4CE5-AAA2-CCE56AF2E814&utm_source=igweb

Affiliate links are an act of service…. That’s hilarious. Also they are clearly broke as this is so beneath who she thinks she is, Sussex and all. By broke I’m sure they have 10s of millions in the bank, but they are spending at least 10m a year on their security, mortgage, lifestyle, jets etc.

And why would Meghan Sussex include a “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” in big bold font at the top of her affiliate page? She knows the title is the only reason anyone pays attention.

In order to be Duchess of Sussex, don't you need to live in Sussex and lord over the people there???

No you don't but if you don't endorse colonialism, birth right superiority privilege, slavery, racism etc, you should feel ashamed to use such titles. More so if you are part black and full American.

Thanks for confirming that you place the bar much higher for black women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is “stress from meanies” the generic name for Ozempic? Who called “fake eating disorder as a tribute to Diana”? Come get your prize!

Meghan and her weave have finally found the freedom to come full circle, like circling a drain, with this influencer stuff. Her instincts are so bad, Tina Brown called it right when saying Markle always gets it wrong. Affiliate links as an act of service, people! Thank goodness she’s worked out her trademark and supply chain issues by merching past-season clothes that can “sell out” since they’re not for sale. The Meghan effect! It’s the Midas touch. Or the mierda touch.

She’s trying to whore out her kids despite the privacy and security claims. You know, all the racists chasing down these visibly…uh…mixed kids. Yes. Their marriage seems super…healthy. She is an inspiration!

https://www.instagram.com/meghan/?ig_mid=6BCBF4B7-4CD6-4CE5-AAA2-CCE56AF2E814&utm_source=igweb

Affiliate links are an act of service…. That’s hilarious. Also they are clearly broke as this is so beneath who she thinks she is, Sussex and all. By broke I’m sure they have 10s of millions in the bank, but they are spending at least 10m a year on their security, mortgage, lifestyle, jets etc.

And why would Meghan Sussex include a “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” in big bold font at the top of her affiliate page? She knows the title is the only reason anyone pays attention.

In order to be Duchess of Sussex, don't you need to live in Sussex and lord over the people there???

No you don't but if you don't endorse colonialism, birth right superiority privilege, slavery, racism etc, you should feel ashamed to use such titles. More so if you are part black and full American.

Exactly. She absolutely does condone that stuff and has said it fully. In the Oprah interview she says that the Prince and Princess titles are her children’s birthright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gosh people are mean. I like her show and In am not sure about a weave because she always had beautiful hair. I have gotten some nice cooking ideas and what is wrong with this! She is making things that non chefs can make so that is nice. Her style is beautiful. My only complaint is that she looks very thin and I am sure it is from stress so people be nice she is trying and actually working so remember she is not a princess who sits around.

Gosh calling someone out on being skinny isn’t really kind either. Good golly!

my comment came from a good place. She has lost a lot of weight since she met Harry. I am guessing it is because of stress so feels inauthentic not to mention this. Not saying anything about how she does her hair or make up. Just a concern for what looks like too much stress put on someone. I wish her well.

I suspect it's more likely Ozempic vanity weight loss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true even Gwyneth Paltrow has taken potshots at Meghan for this awful show?

In a Vanity Fair spread last week, Gwyneth said the following:

“I don’t know Meghan and Harry,” Paltrow says. I’m surprised, given how close they live. “I mean, I’ve met Meghan, who seems really lovely, but I don’t know her at all,” she clarifies. “Maybe I’ll try to get through their security detail and bring them a pie.” She hasn’t seen the trailer for Markle’s Netflix series, With Love, Meghan, either. Based on its fresh-veggie-filled emphasis on the good life, the show seems quite Goop-adjacent, but Paltrow is unthreatened. If anything, she’s inclined to defend the duchess: When “there’s noise about certain women in the culture, I do have, always, a strong instinct to stand up for them.”

That last line, especially, tells me that no, she isn’t taking potshots at MM.

I think it was the right amount of shade, with a nice general statement at the end. Goopy did live in England for years and she can do that subtle British passive aggressive fake gracious yet cutting thing really well.

It wasn't shade at all, what's wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

I think she is trying to be thinner and be a better mom than Kate, her SIL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true even Gwyneth Paltrow has taken potshots at Meghan for this awful show?

In a Vanity Fair spread last week, Gwyneth said the following:

“I don’t know Meghan and Harry,” Paltrow says. I’m surprised, given how close they live. “I mean, I’ve met Meghan, who seems really lovely, but I don’t know her at all,” she clarifies. “Maybe I’ll try to get through their security detail and bring them a pie.” She hasn’t seen the trailer for Markle’s Netflix series, With Love, Meghan, either. Based on its fresh-veggie-filled emphasis on the good life, the show seems quite Goop-adjacent, but Paltrow is unthreatened. If anything, she’s inclined to defend the duchess: When “there’s noise about certain women in the culture, I do have, always, a strong instinct to stand up for them.”

That last line, especially, tells me that no, she isn’t taking potshots at MM.

+1 As does the next part:

"She says she welcomes Markle—and any number of Goop’s descendants—to the proverbial lifestyle space. “I was raised to see other women as friends, not foes,” Paltrow says firmly. “I think there’s always more than enough to go around. Everybody deserves an attempt at everything that they want to try.” It’s a lesson Paltrow learned early, around age 19, from Danner. She’d lost out on a much-coveted role and was griping about the actor cast instead. She says her mother cut her off, telling young Paltrow: “Another woman is never your competition” and “what is right for you will find you.”

I'm not seeing any shade at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she is trying to be thinner and be a better mom than Kate, her SIL.

I honestly don't think Kate is much on her radar lately. Maybe if Kate was a guest on talk shows or selling jam or bath salts, she might be.