2026 Girls Lax WCAC + ISL Outlook

[Anonymous]

Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First round not that exciting given the tiering in the conference, but here goes:

--SR +18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS +14 vs Bullis
--Visi +8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac +5 vs Holton-Arms

Ok, let’s get back to real stuff like this week’s tourney.

I can agree with this.

Thoughts???????

There will be a first round game that is less than 2 goal margin. There will be a second round upset. Just been that kinda year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.

Good note!

--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

The liability if that newborn got hit in the head with a ball or player accidentally tripped and fell on them? Seems dangerous and not wise to strap baby to your chest to coach and do your job. No place for a baby on the sidelines of any lacrosse game.

So are you going to say this about parents that bring younger siblings, including babies, to watch games? These people are on the sidelines too and similar things can happen. We all take risks by stepping outside every day. Just because you wouldn’t make this choice doesn’t mean someone else can’t. Stop judging women and being misogynistic.

Women can't judge women? I don't see any spectators walking along the sidelines.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.

Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.

Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.

Playoffs can be tighter, but HC's recent run of play is not good. Potomac pounded them by 12 last week and they lost by 15 to SR before that. After losing to Holton-Arms. Not exactly peaking for playoffs. Not sure if there were some injuries or what, but sticking with -8.

[Anonymous]

Good line defense analysis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.

Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.

Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

The liability if that newborn got hit in the head with a ball or player accidentally tripped and fell on them? Seems dangerous and not wise to strap baby to your chest to coach and do your job. No place for a baby on the sidelines of any lacrosse game.

So are you going to say this about parents that bring younger siblings, including babies, to watch games? These people are on the sidelines too and similar things can happen. We all take risks by stepping outside every day. Just because you wouldn’t make this choice doesn’t mean someone else can’t. Stop judging women and being misogynistic.

we’re not talking about people in the stands and families coming to watch the game we’re talking about a coach on the turf where the players stand on the bench side right on the field! That it’s not a safe spot for a newborn baby to be hanging out on the turf with the team while a game is being played..

[Anonymous]

Kathy Jenkins should retire to Del Boca Vista Phase 3. She is too old. Please let some new blood come coach a great program that she built but can no longer sustain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

The liability if that newborn got hit in the head with a ball or player accidentally tripped and fell on them? Seems dangerous and not wise to strap baby to your chest to coach and do your job. No place for a baby on the sidelines of any lacrosse game.

So are you going to say this about parents that bring younger siblings, including babies, to watch games? These people are on the sidelines too and similar things can happen. We all take risks by stepping outside every day. Just because you wouldn’t make this choice doesn’t mean someone else can’t. Stop judging women and being misogynistic.

we’re not talking about people in the stands and families coming to watch the game we’re talking about a coach on the turf where the players stand on the bench side right on the field! That it’s not a safe spot for a newborn baby to be hanging out on the turf with the team while a game is being played..

Are we still on this topic? Who cares. If she chooses to coach with her baby strapped to her that’s her business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

The liability if that newborn got hit in the head with a ball or player accidentally tripped and fell on them? Seems dangerous and not wise to strap baby to your chest to coach and do your job. No place for a baby on the sidelines of any lacrosse game.

So are you going to say this about parents that bring younger siblings, including babies, to watch games? These people are on the sidelines too and similar things can happen. We all take risks by stepping outside every day. Just because you wouldn’t make this choice doesn’t mean someone else can’t. Stop judging women and being misogynistic.

we’re not talking about people in the stands and families coming to watch the game we’re talking about a coach on the turf where the players stand on the bench side right on the field! That it’s not a safe spot for a newborn baby to be hanging out on the turf with the team while a game is being played..

Are we still on this topic? Who cares. If she chooses to coach with her baby strapped to her that’s her business.

It depends, does anyone care about the kid or do we just want to crap on the coach?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

The liability if that newborn got hit in the head with a ball or player accidentally tripped and fell on them? Seems dangerous and not wise to strap baby to your chest to coach and do your job. No place for a baby on the sidelines of any lacrosse game.

So are you going to say this about parents that bring younger siblings, including babies, to watch games? These people are on the sidelines too and similar things can happen. We all take risks by stepping outside every day. Just because you wouldn’t make this choice doesn’t mean someone else can’t. Stop judging women and being misogynistic.

we’re not talking about people in the stands and families coming to watch the game we’re talking about a coach on the turf where the players stand on the bench side right on the field! That it’s not a safe spot for a newborn baby to be hanging out on the turf with the team while a game is being played..

Are we still on this topic? Who cares. If she chooses to coach with her baby strapped to her that’s her business.

It depends, does anyone care about the kid or do we just want to crap on the coach?

A lot of judgement by people who's kids were raised by nannies!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

The liability if that newborn got hit in the head with a ball or player accidentally tripped and fell on them? Seems dangerous and not wise to strap baby to your chest to coach and do your job. No place for a baby on the sidelines of any lacrosse game.

So are you going to say this about parents that bring younger siblings, including babies, to watch games? These people are on the sidelines too and similar things can happen. We all take risks by stepping outside every day. Just because you wouldn’t make this choice doesn’t mean someone else can’t. Stop judging women and being misogynistic.

we’re not talking about people in the stands and families coming to watch the game we’re talking about a coach on the turf where the players stand on the bench side right on the field! That it’s not a safe spot for a newborn baby to be hanging out on the turf with the team while a game is being played..

This is just a ridiculous line of argument. Clearly none of you were there or just a GC parent or two trolling (you won, it's all good). Better to have the coach miss a game? SJC sidelines at home are deep. At no time was a child endangered you clowns. I also trust the reflexes of an all time draw control leader who played at the highest level. Let's get a grip and move on. Coaches are human beings, and parents, and sometimes they need to balance the responsibilities. Ours does it incredibly well. I can promise you that SJC families are much more worried that we will lose our coach to her broader family responsibilities, than worried about how our coach balances them. Enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

The liability if that newborn got hit in the head with a ball or player accidentally tripped and fell on them? Seems dangerous and not wise to strap baby to your chest to coach and do your job. No place for a baby on the sidelines of any lacrosse game.

So are you going to say this about parents that bring younger siblings, including babies, to watch games? These people are on the sidelines too and similar things can happen. We all take risks by stepping outside every day. Just because you wouldn’t make this choice doesn’t mean someone else can’t. Stop judging women and being misogynistic.

we’re not talking about people in the stands and families coming to watch the game we’re talking about a coach on the turf where the players stand on the bench side right on the field! That it’s not a safe spot for a newborn baby to be hanging out on the turf with the team while a game is being played..

Are we still on this topic? Who cares. If she chooses to coach with her baby strapped to her that’s her business.

It depends, does anyone care about the kid or do we just want to crap on the coach?

A lot of judgement by people who's kids were raised by nannies!

+1