2026 Girls Lax WCAC + ISL Outlook

[Anonymous]

WCAC Playoffs kick-off today after 3-way tie for 3rd was settled with a draw. Good Counsel is the prohibitive favorite to repeat:

--GC vs. Bishop McNamara (GC -20) [BM is a surprise 8th seed after scoring 5 more goals in their play-in game, than the entire rest of their conference season]

--PVI vs. AHC (PVI -15) [PVI will cruise at home]

--SMR vs. DJO (SMR -6) [SMR has their highest finish in conference in years; will have to travel out to Loudon Co on Friday afternoon if they win as expected. May want to start their drive at the final whistle tomorrow]

--BI vs SJC (SJC -4) [SJC should win the rematch after BI's big 10-9 win on Friday. Trip to Olney is the "reward" if so]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SRs 2030s is legit.

SSSAS model. Bench sitting is so demoralizing.

My source says SR got "all the 2030s"... Not great for the rest of us.

SR has a dozen 2030s who play club, most for strong teams and they have girls coming in every position from high scoring attackers to goalie

Going to be a very crowded bench. Some underclassmen gotta be nervous....

[Anonymous]

Scores

[Anonymous]

16-9 SJC over BI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Scores

18-4 PVI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:16-9 SJC over BI

Was the mascot on the sideline?

[Anonymous]

20 SMR - 10 DJO

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16-9 SJC over BI

Was the mascot on the sideline?

And if so, was the mascot struck in the head?

[Anonymous]

GC 24 - BM 1. Come on...

[Anonymous]

What happened in Ryken/DJO game?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What happened in Ryken/DJO game?

Nevermind, just saw it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened in Ryken/DJO game?

Nevermind, just saw it

What was the score?

[Anonymous]

I'm eager to see how KJ vs SR clown for a coach matchup in this high-stakes championship on Friday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.

Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.

No, your absolute moron. The point being made was that there were no other offensive standouts except the two seniors and that Visitation would not be as strong offensively in the coming years. Get your IEP updated.

You sound unhinged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.

Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.

The worst example is the 49ers, Craig, Rathman, Clarke and Ronnie Lott. Hell you can replace Montana for Young.

Alas. We have all seen this subset of man - at games and showcases and camps. The football dad who has no boys and all girls and transforms into Girls Lax Dad. In his Suburban, he brings his big Yeti coolers and his Yeti bottles and endless trucker hats. Still hits the curl bar no matter how big his tummy gets. I salute you Lax Dad that didn’t get his football playing son. (I make no mention of Girls Lax Dad behavior once the game starts because we all know how this goes.)