2026 Girls Lax WCAC + ISL Outlook

Anonymous
Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.


Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.


Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.


The worst example is the 49ers, Craig, Rathman, Clarke and Ronnie Lott. Hell you can replace Montana for Young.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.


Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.


No, your absolute moron. The point being made was that there were no other offensive standouts except the two seniors and that Visitation would not be as strong offensively in the coming years. Get your IEP updated.
Anonymous
I believe the Visi analysis is wrong. There is a 27, probably two 28s, and at least one 29 that can fill up the cage. Maybe they aren't featured with the presence of the talented seniors, but I would offer that there is more talent there for future years than the ambitious usurpers think.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I believe the Visi analysis is wrong. There is a 27, probably two 28s, and at least one 29 that can fill up the cage. Maybe they aren't featured with the presence of the talented seniors, but I would offer that there is more talent there for future years than the ambitious usurpers think.


I agree with that. Losing those seniors is a significant issue that goes well beyond just scoring, but if we focus solely on points, I'd say that Visi already distributes scoring well enough that they'll have options next year. It's worth noting that all the Big 4 teams are losing key senior scorers. Supporters of other teams might believe their pipelines are strong enough to compete next year. However, they may not fully appreciate what the Big 4 have lined up, which is likely better than expected. Therefore, I would not expect any changes in the makeup of the Big 4 next year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe the Visi analysis is wrong. There is a 27, probably two 28s, and at least one 29 that can fill up the cage. Maybe they aren't featured with the presence of the talented seniors, but I would offer that there is more talent there for future years than the ambitious usurpers think.


I agree with that. Losing those seniors is a significant issue that goes well beyond just scoring, but if we focus solely on points, I'd say that Visi already distributes scoring well enough that they'll have options next year. It's worth noting that all the Big 4 teams are losing key senior scorers. Supporters of other teams might believe their pipelines are strong enough to compete next year. However, they may not fully appreciate what the Big 4 have lined up, which is likely better than expected. Therefore, I would not expect any changes in the makeup of the Big 4 next year.


Do they all have a good pipeline of 2030s coming in?
Anonymous
SRs 2030s is legit.
Anonymous
Can Visi beat SSSAS tomorrow?
Anonymous
Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:SRs 2030s is legit.


My source says SR got "all the 2030s"... Not great for the rest of us.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.


Let's get some new lines going:

1. SR vs. Visi (SR -6)
2. SSSAS vs. Potomac (SSSAS -5)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.


Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.


The worst example is the 49ers, Craig, Rathman, Clarke and Ronnie Lott. Hell you can replace Montana for Young.


Ronnie Lott played offense too?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SRs 2030s is legit.


My source says SR got "all the 2030s"... Not great for the rest of us.


SR has a dozen 2030s who play club, most for strong teams and they have girls coming in every position from high scoring attackers to goalie
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SRs 2030s is legit.


My source says SR got "all the 2030s"... Not great for the rest of us.


SR has a dozen 2030s who play club, most for strong teams and they have girls coming in every position from high scoring attackers to goalie


Going to be a very crowded bench. Some underclassmen gotta be nervous....
post reply Forum Index » Lacrosse
Message Quick Reply
Go to: