Malaysia Airlines Flight Goes Missing En Route to China

[Anonymous]

Links were given to the phone story a page or 2 bag and I corrected myself and said it was the woman who had a phone, not the pilot.

The pilot and his wife were allegedly estranged, but living in the same home up until right before the flight. I thought about the mistress angle too, but I would hope if there was a mistress, investigators would eventually find out through friends and question her. I really hope after all this money and all the work the FBI is doing we don't find out the deleted files in the simulator were porn!

[Anonymous]

Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

I think this is pretty likely to be true, and sadly is about all we can say. Something went wrong (human, mechanical, who knows?) on that flight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

Who is they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

Who is they?

It's being reported on CNN. "They" being the Malaysian authorities

[Anonymous]

Makes you wonder how much of the original information from the Maylays about pings, radar, etc. is accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

Who is they?

It's being reported on CNN. "They" being the Malaysian authorities

Unfortunately I don't trust anything they say. They keep contradicting themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

Who is they?

It's being reported on CNN. "They" being the Malaysian authorities

I'm not seeing this reported on CNN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

Who is they?

It's being reported on CNN. "They" being the Malaysian authorities

Unfortunately I don't trust anything they say. They keep contradicting themselves.

+1 the dissemination of information on this whole event has been horrible.

[Anonymous]

They are reporting now that it looks like a cell phone that was on left caused the autopilot malfunction. Wow...just wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are reporting now that it looks like a cell phone that was on left caused the autopilot malfunction. Wow...just wow.

Who is reporting this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying that ACARS data shows that the turn was not pre-programmed on the plane. Normal route to Beijing was programmed with nothing unusual. So the new theory is something probably went wrong….

Who is they?

It's being reported on CNN. "They" being the Malaysian authorities

I'm not seeing this reported on CNN.

Yes it is, I am watching it on CNN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are reporting now that it looks like a cell phone that was on left caused the autopilot malfunction. Wow...just wow.

Wait, what? Can you find a link? I googled, not finding it. You are saying that they are reporting that a passenger cell phone left on may have interfered with the autopilot???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are reporting now that it looks like a cell phone that was on left caused the autopilot malfunction. Wow...just wow.

Wait, what? Can you find a link? I googled, not finding it. You are saying that they are reporting that a passenger cell phone left on may have interfered with the autopilot???

I bet the folks at Boeing are facepalming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are reporting now that it looks like a cell phone that was on left caused the autopilot malfunction. Wow...just wow.

I think this is an attempt at a joke. If not, let's get the links.