Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
NP here. I disagree. I think jealous is the right word. OP seems to think that her parents leaving her brother more says that they value him more and that they are favoring him by leaving him more money. It's not. The parents have made a decision to leave more inheritance for the child who makes less money and has less insurance, retirement, protection for the future. While I understand that she blames her brother for being lazy, the point is that she could choose to live a bohemian lifestyle, give up working and live life with less and then be eligible for a more equal share of inheritance, but that isn't her choice. She chooses to work, have more disposable income and be able to enjoy the fruits of her labor now. Two different choices.
We have a similar situation. My sister had a hard life, was abused by her ex-husband, divorced and was screwed in the divorce. Instead of working in the field where she has her degree (graphics design), she has opted to take a job working in a floral shop. She truly enjoys her job, her co-workers and her life. It means that she can barely make ends meet. She lives in our brother's old condo and my parents pay my brother rent for her. My brother and I both have professional degrees and work and make very comfortable livings and support our families. Our parents will be leaving 40-50% of their significant wealth to her with the rest divided between my brother and I. Additionally, my sister has one child and my brother and I each have two children, so perforce, her child will get more money (if there is any left when my sister passes) than the other four grandchildren. And you know what? We're all fine with this. We are a loving family and we know that hardships that my sister faced and that choices that she's made to be happy with her life after the trials she's been through. There is enough to go around and if our parents did not provide as much for our sister and she had hardships, my brother and I would have to take care of her anyways. This ensures that she will be able to care for herself without us paying to support her.
So, yes, OP is jealous that she feels that her parents value and love her brother more than her based solely on the distribution of their wealth. That's a very entitled and petty way to view things, but very common.
How is this a similar situation? Do you not see the difference? Your sister has been unfortunate with divorce and husband who abused her. And i completely understand parents wanting to support/provide some safety net for an unfortunate child, it's similar to doing that to a handicapped or a child with some serious health issues.
OP's brother was not abused, he chooses not to work for many years and to let his parents support him for decades. Reading comprehension issues?
The degree to which is it similar is that my sister has a degree plus several years experience in graphic design. She worked for an engineering firm doing PR, publications, and "glossy work". She then worked for a magazine doing much the same. Both were decently paid positions. She quit working when she married to become a SAH wife then mother. When she divorced, she had options to return to her white collar career. She chose not to and to take an hourly position in a floral shop. When she was working full time in the flower shop, she made about 1/4 what she made at either of her white collar jobs. Now she works part-time. She still has the degree and experience. Yes, she her computer skills are out-of-date, but her graphics design background is still relevant. She could get back in the industry and work and sustain herself. So, like OP's brother, she could in fact, support herself without needing to live in our brother's old condo and have her parents pay her rent. But she chose not to. That was about 18 years ago and now it really isn't an option. But even if she had taken a year or two (or three or five) she could have gotten back to work and had 15+ years working at a job with a decent salary, put more money into social security and saved some for retirement. Instead she worked less and less (she works about 15 hours normal weeks and works about 45 hours for two weeks for several holidays like Mother's Day, Father's Day, Christmas, etc). Heck she's only 60 and should could have had 20 years of work after 3 years of personal time and still retired at 65.
Yes, for the last 15+ years, she has chosen not to work and let her parents support her. But in our family, we don't belittle her choice or call her lazy. And we don't begrudge her taking an easier path and us supporting her and getting an unequal portion of inheritance. We love and support her decisions. So, I don't feel that her life is completely different from OP's brother. Yes, there was abuse and an antagonistic divorce. But there are plenty of people who go through the same and have to jump back to work immediately. Even taking up to five years, she could have still gone back to work. There was nothing physically stopping her. In fact the white collar jobs would have been physically much easier to handling than the floral shop job.