Heads should roll on this horrendous issue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And since you seem to love procedure so much:

The Geneva Conventions and federal law also impose an obligation on the United States to investigate and prosecute violations of the laws of war under its jurisdiction, including military bases in Afghanistan. “There are no gray areas here,” said John Sifton of Human Rights Watch.

Give me a link and citation for a formal policy or order that prevented our soldiers from doing so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

Let me explain to you. There is something WRONG with society and the system that someone that intervenes to help another that is suffering or in pain is punished. Just because it is a consequence does not make it RIGHT. get it? And we should decorate this guy who helped a child who was CHAINED. Not remove a sterling officer from service because he happens to embody the best of american values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

Let me explain to you. There is something WRONG with society and the system that someone that intervenes to help another that is suffering or in pain is punished. Just because it is a consequence does not make it RIGHT. get it? And we should decorate this guy who helped a child who was CHAINED. Not remove a sterling officer from service because he happens to embody the best of american values.

You've been watching far too many fantasy action movies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And since you seem to love procedure so much:

The Geneva Conventions and federal law also impose an obligation on the United States to investigate and prosecute violations of the laws of war under its jurisdiction, including military bases in Afghanistan. “There are no gray areas here,” said John Sifton of Human Rights Watch.

Give me a link and citation for a formal policy or order that prevented our soldiers from doing so.

Yes all this could not be true because we can't find a formal policy despite all the accounts from veterans and good journalism work by a oh *gasp* liberal newspaper. There could not possibly be a coverup. Give me a break. Go shove your arguments somewhere else, you inhumane lperson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

Let me explain to you. There is something WRONG with society and the system that someone that intervenes to help another that is suffering or in pain is punished. Just because it is a consequence does not make it RIGHT. get it? And we should decorate this guy who helped a child who was CHAINED. Not remove a sterling officer from service because he happens to embody the best of american values.

You've been watching far too many fantasy action movies.

And when you start arguing that this is right and child rape is okay you've officially lost it.

[Anonymous]

Still waiting for a citation and link to that official, final, adopted, issued policy or order that requires our soldiers to turn a blind eye to child rape....

[Anonymous]

More information hopefully will come out in the coming days.

the lack of an official policy does not make the accounts that the NyTimes revealed not true. And I am gladdened by the comments on that site that most people have not lost their humanity unlike you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

Let me explain to you. There is something WRONG with society and the system that someone that intervenes to help another that is suffering or in pain is punished. Just because it is a consequence does not make it RIGHT. get it? And we should decorate this guy who helped a child who was CHAINED. Not remove a sterling officer from service because he happens to embody the best of american values.

You've been watching far too many fantasy action movies.

And when you start arguing that this is right and child rape is okay you've officially lost it.

You have to lie in order to claim I've "lost it?"

GET IT STRAIGHT: I NEVER, EVER SAID CHILD RAPE IS OK. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?

Sorry, dude, but when you just start BLATANTLY LYING YOUR ASS OFF like that, then YOU have "officially lost it"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

Let me explain to you. There is something WRONG with society and the system that someone that intervenes to help another that is suffering or in pain is punished. Just because it is a consequence does not make it RIGHT. get it? And we should decorate this guy who helped a child who was CHAINED. Not remove a sterling officer from service because he happens to embody the best of american values.

Exactly how did "pushing" the man help the boy? If the green beret truly wanted to help that boy, he would have either stolen/bought the boy, or killed the man. Then the boy would be saved. Right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

He pushed him. Career ending?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

Let me explain to you. There is something WRONG with society and the system that someone that intervenes to help another that is suffering or in pain is punished. Just because it is a consequence does not make it RIGHT. get it? And we should decorate this guy who helped a child who was CHAINED. Not remove a sterling officer from service because he happens to embody the best of american values.

Exactly how did "pushing" the man help the boy? If the green beret truly wanted to help that boy, he would have either stolen/bought the boy, or killed the man. Then the boy would be saved. Right?

It communicated in the policemans language. Afghans are all about 'face'. People.i know who served there agree with this interpretation..the policeman was laughing when they just said "please".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

OK, hon, who put some itching powder on your balls?

Hell yes I'd whine! I'd complain! I'd raise a goddamn stink. But you seem to think it's fine to punish someone for doing the right thing.

Your black and white views complement your nearly absent critical thinking skills. You earn the reward for biggest dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More information hopefully will come out in the coming days.

the lack of an official policy does not make the accounts that the NyTimes revealed not true. And I am gladdened by the comments on that site that most people have not lost their humanity unlike you.

"Lost my humanity" - Pffft. You are the one who has let his partisan desperation get so far out of control that you have resorted to LYING YOUR ASS OFF here by claiming other posters are somehow condoning child rape.

And sorry, but you ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT claim a "policy change" without actually having that specific order or policy document to point to. That IS how it works, PERIOD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's deconstruct this once and for all with an analogy:

If soldier A found out that soldier B was a wife beater, and then soldier A beat the crap out of soldier B for it, guess what, soldier A would be charged under the UCMJ for beating soldier B. The fact that soldier B beat his wife doesn't change anything about how soldier A acted inappropriately. Soldier B's situation with his wife beating is a separate issue from soldier A's beating soldier B up, both are issues that would get charges filed. Soldier B's behavior does not excuse soldier A's behavior. Got it?

I'd hate to have you in my family - sibling, spouse, child.

Let's not break a "rule" to save a life. sheeple asshole

Hey, FUCK YOU too. Are you willfully stupid, or what?

Lemme explain this one last time: If you beat your wife, and I come over and beat the shit out of you for it, that's a choice I make, and if I get arrested and charged with assault for it, that's a consequence I accept. The problem is not with me not wanting to "break rules." The difference is that I am aware of the consequences, and I would accept them, and I would PROUDLY take my court date and whatever sentence for it, rather than thinking I could just beat the shit out of someone and get away with it, regardless of what a scumbag you are. I damn sure wouldn't be sitting around WHINING about it the way you pathetic scumbags are.

Look, I wouldn't want you in my family either. You'd be the FIRST to just sit around and whine as opposed to doing anything at all.

Let me explain to you. There is something WRONG with society and the system that someone that intervenes to help another that is suffering or in pain is punished. Just because it is a consequence does not make it RIGHT. get it? And we should decorate this guy who helped a child who was CHAINED. Not remove a sterling officer from service because he happens to embody the best of american values.

You've been watching far too many fantasy action movies.

And when you start arguing that this is right and child rape is okay you've officially lost it.

You have to lie in order to claim I've "lost it?"

GET IT STRAIGHT: I NEVER, EVER SAID CHILD RAPE IS OK. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?

Sorry, dude, but when you just start BLATANTLY LYING YOUR ASS OFF like that, then YOU have "officially lost it"

This poster has officially lost it and is throwing swear words around the place. Please remove his or her post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for a citation and link to that official, final, adopted, issued policy or order that requires our soldiers to turn a blind eye to child rape....

Can u find am instance when it was reported and acted upon? Oh, because it gets reported 'up the chain' all the time. When nothing is done, thats a policy of approval.