Why do MAGA assume all blue cities are violent crime ridden hell scapes?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You have prosecutors who drop cases, or downgrade them in the name of equity.

Read an account of a lady in Virginia, a few years ago came in to testify about an assault.
The prosecutor asked is the person in the courtroom right now? When she answered, the case was dismissed as a violation of the defendant's civil rights, because the courtroom was almost empty.
The arresting officer had been 'mistakenly' directed to the wrong courtroom, and didn't appear until the case was already over.
This defendant has committed many more assaults since, and has evaded jail every time.


This is where they screw up. I'm as liberal as they come and I'm OK with giving people second chances, but these prosecutors and judges who keep releasing violent REPEAT OFFENDERS onto the street have it all wrong.

I'd wager that the majority of Democrats agree with that as well. There should be some public opinion polling done on this and it should be shown to the prosecutors and judges, that we value safety from violent repeat offenders over virtue signaling.


After electing a 34x felon who then released the violent J6 insurrectionists back onto the streets, Republicans lost all credibility on crime.


Posts like this real of privilege. I guarantee you don’t live, work, or frequent dangerous areas of any city we’re talking about.

I challenge all you woke suburbanites to walk a mile in any direction in Sandtown or the Middle East in Baltimore tonight and then come back to the thread to pretend that you’re more scared of rural America. It’s easy to be woke living in your redlined suburb.


I lived in North Philly for a decade, currently live in a different metropolis. Good try though.

You don’t exactly sound like you live in Compton.


Uh, that’s racist. And if you lived in North Philly I challenge anyone to walk down Frankford Ave in Kensington at 11 pm and report back about how it’s way more unsafe in rural America. Pics or it didn’t happen.


Nowhere was race mentioned. You’re the one who brought it up. Says a lot about you.

Try driving alone through the rural south as a woman with Massachusetts plates and left wing bumper stickers. Let me know what kind of reception you get.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You have prosecutors who drop cases, or downgrade them in the name of equity.

Read an account of a lady in Virginia, a few years ago came in to testify about an assault.
The prosecutor asked is the person in the courtroom right now? When she answered, the case was dismissed as a violation of the defendant's civil rights, because the courtroom was almost empty.
The arresting officer had been 'mistakenly' directed to the wrong courtroom, and didn't appear until the case was already over.
This defendant has committed many more assaults since, and has evaded jail every time.


This is where they screw up. I'm as liberal as they come and I'm OK with giving people second chances, but these prosecutors and judges who keep releasing violent REPEAT OFFENDERS onto the street have it all wrong.

I'd wager that the majority of Democrats agree with that as well. There should be some public opinion polling done on this and it should be shown to the prosecutors and judges, that we value safety from violent repeat offenders over virtue signaling.


After electing a 34x felon who then released the violent J6 insurrectionists back onto the streets, Republicans lost all credibility on crime.


This is why the dems keep losing. Dems keep doubling down on pro-crime agendas when every voter knows J6 has nothing to do with why streets are wafting with odor of marijuana and urine, toothpaste is under lock and key at Walgreens, and large swathes of America's urban centers are sundown neighborhoods where no one dares to walk at night. Voters aren't stupid, and know perfectly well J6 has zilch to do with all that.


Republicans are pro crime. They keep electing felons and pedophiles and con men and rip-off artists and pathological liars and fraudsters and grifters into office. They vote for people who are fine with violent mobs of thugs attacking, vandalizing and looting government buildings and assaulting police officers. Seems the only criminals they have a problem with are non-whites. So, complete hypocrisy to constantly say "yabut Dems yabut Dems yabut Dems." DO BETTER.

No voter believes that. The fact you keep doubling down on a failed message is a bullish sign for repubs. Catch and release, abolish the police, BLM, forgiveness of criminal, light sentencing are ALL associated with dems in voters minds, and dems won't change that association by chanting J6!


This is all a set of FACTS:

Republicans are pro crime. They keep electing felons and pedophiles and con men and rip-off artists and pathological liars and fraudsters and grifters into office. They vote for people who are fine with violent mobs of thugs attacking, vandalizing and looting government buildings and assaulting police officers. Seems the only criminals they have a problem with are non-whites. So, complete hypocrisy to constantly say "yabut Dems yabut Dems yabut Dems."

Denying it doesn't change reality. If you "don't believe it" then all you're telling us is that you are at best misled and out of touch with reality and the news, or perhaps a bit delusional or suffering other mental issues, and maybe you need counseling.

Which is it, PP?

Yabut Dems works soooooo much better than yabut J6. Go ahead and ask your kids. For Gen Z and Gen Alpha, all the memes parodying the George Floyd riots hit 1000x harder than J6. That's electoral reality. Until you open your eyes to reality, you're just gonna keep tripping and stumbling over the same messaging mistakes rationalizing democrat pro-criminality. Which your opponents are perfectly OK with you doing!


So what you’re saying is that it’s all about the messaging, not the reality. Whatever “works” to brainwash the kids is your truth.
Anonymous
It is easier to deflect with stories of crime ridden cities so that rural areas don't notice when the Trump administration makes their water dirtier or depletes their water and energy supply with massive, unregulated, building of AI datacenters.

Anonymous
Republicans make a lot of noise about this but they don't really understand anything. Trump put thousands of FBI, DEA and other agents on DC streets, plus thousands of National Guard, and it really didn't do much. Arrests didn't go up, crime didn't really end. But it cost taxpayers millions of dollars a week.

Republicans tend to suffer from a lot of naivete about how "simple" things are to fix, and don't actually understand the costs.

Nor do they ever stop to think about second and third order effects of their policies.

Any simpleton can say "there's a crime problem" but it takes a lot more thinking to actually solve it. Just throwing policing at it doesn't do it.
Anonymous
Three decades and 400 studies failed to find any correlation between political affiliation of the mayor and crime rates. It has more to do with city size, poverty, housing instability, and other structural factors.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Republicans make a lot of noise about this but they don't really understand anything. Trump put thousands of FBI, DEA and other agents on DC streets, plus thousands of National Guard, and it really didn't do much. Arrests didn't go up, crime didn't really end. But it cost taxpayers millions of dollars a week.

Republicans tend to suffer from a lot of naivete about how "simple" things are to fix, and don't actually understand the costs.

Nor do they ever stop to think about second and third order effects of their policies.

Any simpleton can say "there's a crime problem" but it takes a lot more thinking to actually solve it. Just throwing policing at it doesn't do it.


If they wanted to solve DC crime, just a focus on solving the prosecution rate issue was all they needed to do. But hey, smoke and mirrors provides a show for people in East Bumblef*ck who have no idea what the actual issues are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It is easier to deflect with stories of crime ridden cities so that rural areas don't notice when the Trump administration makes their water dirtier or depletes their water and energy supply with massive, unregulated, building of AI datacenters.



Our opinion of cities is from “lived experience” (as you like to call it) not the news.

Are you rejecting the lived experiences of the people who have lived in urban Philadelphia, NYC, and DC?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is easier to deflect with stories of crime ridden cities so that rural areas don't notice when the Trump administration makes their water dirtier or depletes their water and energy supply with massive, unregulated, building of AI datacenters.



Our opinion of cities is from “lived experience” (as you like to call it) not the news.

Are you rejecting the lived experiences of the people who have lived in urban Philadelphia, NYC, and DC?



No, we are saying you are anti-social p#ssies who couldn’t hack it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is easier to deflect with stories of crime ridden cities so that rural areas don't notice when the Trump administration makes their water dirtier or depletes their water and energy supply with massive, unregulated, building of AI datacenters.



Our opinion of cities is from “lived experience” (as you like to call it) not the news.

Are you rejecting the lived experiences of the people who have lived in urban Philadelphia, NYC, and DC?



I lived in DC for 14 years. They could just address the OAG staffing and prosection issue (which they do seem to be somewhat) without the theatrics and waste of taxpayer money. Yes much of this administration is a distraction from sh*t like AI which is driving accelerated job losses, electricity prices, ane depleting water resources.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is easier to deflect with stories of crime ridden cities so that rural areas don't notice when the Trump administration makes their water dirtier or depletes their water and energy supply with massive, unregulated, building of AI datacenters.



Our opinion of cities is from “lived experience” (as you like to call it) not the news.

Are you rejecting the lived experiences of the people who have lived in urban Philadelphia, NYC, and DC?



No, we are saying you are anti-social p#ssies who couldn’t hack it.


Hm, I thought the Democrats were the party of tolerance of different preferences and embracing diversity of lifestyles.

I’m really shocked to hear your perspective on this issue

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is easier to deflect with stories of crime ridden cities so that rural areas don't notice when the Trump administration makes their water dirtier or depletes their water and energy supply with massive, unregulated, building of AI datacenters.



Our opinion of cities is from “lived experience” (as you like to call it) not the news.

Are you rejecting the lived experiences of the people who have lived in urban Philadelphia, NYC, and DC?



No, we are saying you are anti-social p#ssies who couldn’t hack it.


Hm, I thought the Democrats were the party of tolerance of different preferences and embracing diversity of lifestyles.

I’m really shocked to hear your perspective on this issue



Democrats are generally intolerant of intolerant people. We have our limits.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You have prosecutors who drop cases, or downgrade them in the name of equity.

Read an account of a lady in Virginia, a few years ago came in to testify about an assault.
The prosecutor asked is the person in the courtroom right now? When she answered, the case was dismissed as a violation of the defendant's civil rights, because the courtroom was almost empty.
The arresting officer had been 'mistakenly' directed to the wrong courtroom, and didn't appear until the case was already over.
This defendant has committed many more assaults since, and has evaded jail every time.


This is where they screw up. I'm as liberal as they come and I'm OK with giving people second chances, but these prosecutors and judges who keep releasing violent REPEAT OFFENDERS onto the street have it all wrong.

I'd wager that the majority of Democrats agree with that as well. There should be some public opinion polling done on this and it should be shown to the prosecutors and judges, that we value safety from violent repeat offenders over virtue signaling.


After electing a 34x felon who then released the violent J6 insurrectionists back onto the streets, Republicans lost all credibility on crime.


Posts like this real of privilege. I guarantee you don’t live, work, or frequent dangerous areas of any city we’re talking about.

I challenge all you woke suburbanites to walk a mile in any direction in Sandtown or the Middle East in Baltimore tonight and then come back to the thread to pretend that you’re more scared of rural America. It’s easy to be woke living in your redlined suburb.


I lived in North Philly for a decade, currently live in a different metropolis. Good try though.

You don’t exactly sound like you live in Compton.


Uh, that’s racist. And if you lived in North Philly I challenge anyone to walk down Frankford Ave in Kensington at 11 pm and report back about how it’s way more unsafe in rural America. Pics or it didn’t happen.


Nowhere was race mentioned. You’re the one who brought it up. Says a lot about you.

Try driving alone through the rural south as a woman with Massachusetts plates and left wing bumper stickers. Let me know what kind of reception you get.


Get over yourself. You’ll get stares and rude comments at worst.

Walk down Frankford Ave in Kensington. Maybe wear a Moncler coat. Report back with how it works out for you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You have prosecutors who drop cases, or downgrade them in the name of equity.

Read an account of a lady in Virginia, a few years ago came in to testify about an assault.
The prosecutor asked is the person in the courtroom right now? When she answered, the case was dismissed as a violation of the defendant's civil rights, because the courtroom was almost empty.
The arresting officer had been 'mistakenly' directed to the wrong courtroom, and didn't appear until the case was already over.
This defendant has committed many more assaults since, and has evaded jail every time.


This is where they screw up. I'm as liberal as they come and I'm OK with giving people second chances, but these prosecutors and judges who keep releasing violent REPEAT OFFENDERS onto the street have it all wrong.

I'd wager that the majority of Democrats agree with that as well. There should be some public opinion polling done on this and it should be shown to the prosecutors and judges, that we value safety from violent repeat offenders over virtue signaling.


After electing a 34x felon who then released the violent J6 insurrectionists back onto the streets, Republicans lost all credibility on crime.


Posts like this real of privilege. I guarantee you don’t live, work, or frequent dangerous areas of any city we’re talking about.

I challenge all you woke suburbanites to walk a mile in any direction in Sandtown or the Middle East in Baltimore tonight and then come back to the thread to pretend that you’re more scared of rural America. It’s easy to be woke living in your redlined suburb.


I lived in North Philly for a decade, currently live in a different metropolis. Good try though.

You don’t exactly sound like you live in Compton.


Uh, that’s racist. And if you lived in North Philly I challenge anyone to walk down Frankford Ave in Kensington at 11 pm and report back about how it’s way more unsafe in rural America. Pics or it didn’t happen.


Nowhere was race mentioned. You’re the one who brought it up. Says a lot about you.

Try driving alone through the rural south as a woman with Massachusetts plates and left wing bumper stickers. Let me know what kind of reception you get.


Get over yourself. You’ll get stares and rude comments at worst.

Walk down Frankford Ave in Kensington. Maybe wear a Moncler coat. Report back with how it works out for you.


As a matter of fact, I have walked through Kensington, with $120 cash on me. Nothing happened.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is easier to deflect with stories of crime ridden cities so that rural areas don't notice when the Trump administration makes their water dirtier or depletes their water and energy supply with massive, unregulated, building of AI datacenters.



Our opinion of cities is from “lived experience” (as you like to call it) not the news.

Are you rejecting the lived experiences of the people who have lived in urban Philadelphia, NYC, and DC?



No, we are saying you are anti-social p#ssies who couldn’t hack it.


Hm, I thought the Democrats were the party of tolerance of different preferences and embracing diversity of lifestyles.

I’m really shocked to hear your perspective on this issue



Democrats are generally intolerant of intolerant people. We have our limits.


And preferring to live in a rural area over an urban one is a clear example of intolerance.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You have prosecutors who drop cases, or downgrade them in the name of equity.

Read an account of a lady in Virginia, a few years ago came in to testify about an assault.
The prosecutor asked is the person in the courtroom right now? When she answered, the case was dismissed as a violation of the defendant's civil rights, because the courtroom was almost empty.
The arresting officer had been 'mistakenly' directed to the wrong courtroom, and didn't appear until the case was already over.
This defendant has committed many more assaults since, and has evaded jail every time.


This is where they screw up. I'm as liberal as they come and I'm OK with giving people second chances, but these prosecutors and judges who keep releasing violent REPEAT OFFENDERS onto the street have it all wrong.

I'd wager that the majority of Democrats agree with that as well. There should be some public opinion polling done on this and it should be shown to the prosecutors and judges, that we value safety from violent repeat offenders over virtue signaling.


After electing a 34x felon who then released the violent J6 insurrectionists back onto the streets, Republicans lost all credibility on crime.


Posts like this real of privilege. I guarantee you don’t live, work, or frequent dangerous areas of any city we’re talking about.

I challenge all you woke suburbanites to walk a mile in any direction in Sandtown or the Middle East in Baltimore tonight and then come back to the thread to pretend that you’re more scared of rural America. It’s easy to be woke living in your redlined suburb.


I lived in North Philly for a decade, currently live in a different metropolis. Good try though.

You don’t exactly sound like you live in Compton.


Uh, that’s racist. And if you lived in North Philly I challenge anyone to walk down Frankford Ave in Kensington at 11 pm and report back about how it’s way more unsafe in rural America. Pics or it didn’t happen.


Nowhere was race mentioned. You’re the one who brought it up. Says a lot about you.

Try driving alone through the rural south as a woman with Massachusetts plates and left wing bumper stickers. Let me know what kind of reception you get.


Get over yourself. You’ll get stares and rude comments at worst.

Walk down Frankford Ave in Kensington. Maybe wear a Moncler coat. Report back with how it works out for you.


We all know that PPs experience with urban vibrancy is limited to the mean streets of Georgetown and Kalorama.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: