Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel for the people. But I also hope it’s a wake up call in the land of climate change denialism. They need to rethink housing in the hurricane belt. Make it more reliant and build in different locations— that assume a hundred year storm every few years. Because I tired of FEMA bailing out people the 4th and 5th time they have massive hurricane distraction. The definition of insanity and all that. And expensive insanity.
Well "the hurricane belt" now includes Asheville NC.
So I guess we stop building everywhere from Florida all the way up to New Jersey/New York, which have also been damaged by hurricanes. BTW, that includes DC area which has also been hit.
Which is a bummer. I was eyeing that area for retirement. Scratch that idea.
+1 And can't go to the west coast either! Looks like fly-over country is the place to be!
Appalachia was supposed to be a safe haven for people fleeing the effects of climate change, until it wasn't.
Sometimes, it seems like places with seemingly gentle climates have subtle dangers that aren't as obvious as hurricanes.
The Pacific Northwest is often cited as haven, but I wouldn't want to be around when that giant volcano erupts.
Maybe we should all move to Ohio.