Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Manafort went to jail for not registering under FARA. Rules for thee, not for me

The alleged activities undertaken by H Biden were not subjected to FARA. Does that answer your question?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP forgets the Michael Flynn son charges under FARA. Why didn't Hunter or Jim Biden register while working with Ukrainian, Romanian or Chinese businesses?

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/08/politics/michael-flynn-son-special-counsel-russia-investigation/index.html

Because they weren’t doing anything covered by FARA.

Nice try... wrong again. Under Section 612(a) of FARA, parties must file a registration statement within 10 days of having agreed to act as an agent of a foreign principal.

You keep avoiding the question. What specific activities required them to register? In other words, what activities made them an agent of a foreign principal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP forgets the Michael Flynn son charges under FARA. Why didn't Hunter or Jim Biden register while working with Ukrainian, Romanian or Chinese businesses?

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/08/politics/michael-flynn-son-special-counsel-russia-investigation/index.html

Because they weren’t doing anything covered by FARA.

Nice try... wrong again. Under Section 612(a) of FARA, parties must file a registration statement within 10 days of having agreed to act as an agent of a foreign principal.

He was neither. Try again.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile this chart proves Biden Inc had relations with Chinese "principals", yet never registered under FARA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile this chart proves Biden Inc had relations with Chinese "principals", yet never registered under FARA

I’m beginning to suspect you have no clue what FARA actually requires. Nothing on this chart would require registration.

[Anonymous]

Bryon Donalds nails it! Trump Inc owned real estate all his life, yet what did Biden Inc own besides influence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile this chart proves Biden Inc had relations with Chinese "principals", yet never registered under FARA

I’m beginning to suspect you have no clue what FARA actually requires. Nothing on this chart would require registration.

I already know you have no clue of FARA and running cover for an inept and corrupt career politician. Wonder why the Biden campaign is almost 3 weeks old with only 2 employees. The walls are closing in

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile this chart proves Biden Inc had relations with Chinese "principals", yet never registered under FARA

I’m beginning to suspect you have no clue what FARA actually requires. Nothing on this chart would require registration.

I already know you have no clue of FARA and running cover for an inept and corrupt career politician. Wonder why the Biden campaign is almost 3 weeks old with only 2 employees. The walls are closing in

Oh yes, they are so so scared of some rando spouting FARA accusations.

[Anonymous]

Looking at some of the Twitter replies, it seems like this is going to inspire crazy people to do violent things, and they'll think they're justified in doing so.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

That post reminds me of this:

Lying at a debate is not criminal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all get on board with tightening up the qualifications for POTUS? If Biden did this, it should have come up in a pre-POTUS run background check.

More rules for who can be POTUS, please.

We don't know what Biden did, they're just flinging crap without any evidence.

That's fine. But WHILE they are flinging crap, perhaps they want to get on board with having some sort of minimum qualifications for the job? No history of shady dealings would be on my list. For Biden or.... anyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all get on board with tightening up the qualifications for POTUS? If Biden did this, it should have come up in a pre-POTUS run background check.

More rules for who can be POTUS, please.

We don't know what Biden did, they're just flinging crap without any evidence.

That's fine. But WHILE they are flinging crap, perhaps they want to get on board with having some sort of minimum qualifications for the job? No history of shady dealings would be on my list. For Biden or.... anyone else.

Or, while they are flinging crap, you could refrain from giving it creedence by not reacting to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all get on board with tightening up the qualifications for POTUS? If Biden did this, it should have come up in a pre-POTUS run background check.

More rules for who can be POTUS, please.

We don't know what Biden did, they're just flinging crap without any evidence.

That's fine. But WHILE they are flinging crap, perhaps they want to get on board with having some sort of minimum qualifications for the job? No history of shady dealings would be on my list. For Biden or.... anyone else.

Does “shady business” include running a company convicted of criminal tax fraud? Because republicans are certainly not going to propose that.