DP. I want $1K and will never get it. These were the chances that Ukraine would join EU any time soon. This is a very superficial explanation of why Russia invaded and what Ukrainian Maidan leaders wanted. |
I would say 3 centuries is pretty deep |
Superficial? I'd suggest some superficiality on your part to casually ignore that the Verkhovna Rada voted on the Ukraine-EU agreement and it passed with a solid majority, before Yanukovich unilaterally scuttled the deal and announced that Ukraine would instead pursue closer ties with Russia. |
Not really, hardly any actually Russians even lived there. Most ethnic Russians living there today are maybe only 1 or 2 generations deep at best. |
Nuland and her comments are little more than a convenient sound bite for pro-Russia propagandists. |
That’s hardly a case for Ukraine you know. |
Crimea was legally and peacefully transferred by the USSR to Ukraine 70 years ago. Russia took it violently and illegally, going against the UN charter. |
Now it appears that Ukraine is going to violently and legally retake their land with a little help from some friends. |
Because friends stand up for underdogs who are being bullied. |
Lol right |
DP. To be completely fair, before Stalin's 1932-33 holodomor and subsequent 1943-44 ethnic migration / genocidal purge (whatever you want to call it), I think there were far fewer Russians in that area. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the term “White Russian” described ethnic Russians living in the area between Russia and Poland (Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia and Moldova). The Black Sea region were primarily Volga Germans and several non-Slavic nationalities of the Crimea and the northern Caucasus: Crimean Tatars, Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Balkars, Karachays, Meskhetian Turks, Bulgarians, Crimean Greeks, Romanians, and Armenians. Specifically, the North Caucasus and Crimea were mainly Chechens, Ingushi, Karachai, Balkars, Kalmyks, Meskhetian Turks, and Crimean Tatars. In 1943-44, approximately 2 (up for debate) million people were removed by the NKVD. "Effectively, the whole Black Sea coastal region was cleared of ethnic minorities." https://holodomorct.org/holodomor-information-links/maps-and-demography/ https://holodomor.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Kulchytsky_monograph-Text-GreyScale-no-margins.pdf https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1943-2/deportation-of-minorities/ https://www.languagesoftheworld.info/russia-ukraine-and-the-caucasus/stalins-ethnic-deportations-gerrymandered-ethnic-map.html So when the Russians argue that the Crimea and North Caucasus are "predominantly Russian", I guess you could say that's true.. today.. thanks to the 1944'ish genocidal bloody purges by Stalin and company? ![]() |
Oh, and the icing on the cake?
In 2014, there were 1,492,078 Russians in Crimea. 344,515 Ukrainians and about 277,336 Crimean Tatars / Tatars. So add back those killed / relocated / missing from Stalin's purge and subtract the Russians who took over their farms / factories / businesses, etc; voila! It was never truly part of Russia or Russian territory. What's happening now is really Karmic, don't you agree? |
And there are still people alive today who were part of this. It reinforces how evil Russia was and still is. |
The analogy I'd use is a gang dragging a family out from their home, raping and executing them, then occupying and living in the home for 80 years; then complaining when the police come knocking on their door. |
The EU would not have signed it without significant changes and it was heavily conditioned on a number of things Honestly I am surprised Russia seemed so upset by it. Europe was trying to lure Ukraine in but it wasn’t going to make it easy But of course Ukraine shouldn’t have angered the bear without any real chances of getting anything I don’t believe they didn’t know it was all illusion and they had a long way ahead of them There must have been something else. Like maybe politicians just using some popular gimmicks to stay in power |