The new reign of King Charles III has begun

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do either of them speak Welsh?
Strange to be prince and princess of Wales when you have no connection to it

Not for the British! Hello colonialism.

[Anonymous]

William and Catherine literally lived in wales full time from 2001-2013. The ignorance is astonishing.

[Anonymous]

2011-2013

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

Except they can’t also be working royals then. And if they aren’t working royals, they don’t get HRH or security. But rather than acknowledging their choice was the reason, Meghan wants to call racism.

So they can be financially independent, but then need to stop pouting about what they chose to walk away from.

Charles' speech was a shining example of the very British art of insult packaged as compliment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do either of them speak Welsh?
Strange to be prince and princess of Wales when you have no connection to it

Maybe they will learn Welsh before their investiture just as Charles did.

Why would they? Most Welsh people don’t speak welsh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:William and Catherine literally lived in wales full time from 2001-2013. The ignorance is astonishing.

Anyone not watch the crown where Prince Charles' learns Welsh?

https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a29892259/the-crown-prince-charles-welsh-teacher-tutor-true-story/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

One more time: William and Harry are not equals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate just made Prince and Princess of Wales

Well that didn't take long
https://www.instagram.com/princeandprincessofwales/

Did you catch that they changed their handle to D of D of Cornwall and Cambridge when the Queen was still dead in her bed? The thirst is real.

It is tradition and what is expected. Please do some basic research and save yourself the embarrassment.

Her death was expected, not a surprise. Everything was prearranged and some social media communication guy had instructions to change it after official announcement. Its not like they did it themselves.

So what? Who cares if they didn't do it themselves! Get a grip.

Why are you foaming at the mouth? You should get a grip.

Why do people always say this when they have no response. LOL I am truly not "foaming". Please try to respond with a little more creativity but I expect you don't have any which is why you are parroting me! and accused me of foaming...

PPP: Tell her she's rabid -- she won't know what that means!

\

Well I think I am speaking to two rabid people so there is that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

Except they can’t also be working royals then. And if they aren’t working royals, they don’t get HRH or security. But rather than acknowledging their choice was the reason, Meghan wants to call racism.

So they can be financially independent, but then need to stop pouting about what they chose to walk away from.

Charles' speech was a shining example of the very British art of insult packaged as compliment.

Exactly. Damning with faint praise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

One more time: William and Harry are not equals.

So then why do you people act dumbfounded that he doesn’t want all of the downsides of the same deal with none of the benefits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

Except they can’t also be working royals then. And if they aren’t working royals, they don’t get HRH or security. But rather than acknowledging their choice was the reason, Meghan wants to call racism.

So they can be financially independent, but then need to stop pouting about what they chose to walk away from.

HRH isn’t reserved for working royals as there are other members of the BRF who also have that. Also just because the motivation is financial doesn’t mean that racism wasn’t present or also a reason. You don’t actually have to be a perfect, pure of motive person to also be mistreated based on your race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

One more time: William and Harry are not equals.

So then why do you people act dumbfounded that he doesn’t want all of the downsides of the same deal with none of the benefits?

Because we aren't all one person speaking. I am sure there are some benefits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

One more time: William and Harry are not equals.

So then why do you people act dumbfounded that he doesn’t want all of the downsides of the same deal with none of the benefits?

Because we aren't all one person speaking. I am sure there are some benefits.

Begging your parent - and eventually your older brother - for allowances throughout your life seems really degrading.

Besides, Prince Andrew shows that idle royal hands are a dangerous thing for The Firm. Better for these people to work at a career, learn how to budget their own money, be self-sufficient, etc.

Harry can read the writing on the wall.

[Anonymous]

At the Queen’s service in Edinburgh, Nicola Sturgeon read a very pointed section from Ecclesiastes which states “there is a time to keep and a time to cast away.” Since the Queen selected the readings in advance, I wonder if this is her subtle message to encourage Scottish independence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

One more time: William and Harry are not equals.

So then why do you people act dumbfounded that he doesn’t want all of the downsides of the same deal with none of the benefits?

Because we aren't all one person speaking. I am sure there are some benefits.

Begging your parent - and eventually your older brother - for allowances throughout your life seems really degrading.

Besides, Prince Andrew shows that idle royal hands are a dangerous thing for The Firm. Better for these people to work at a career, learn how to budget their own money, be self-sufficient, etc.

Harry can read the writing on the wall.

Princess Margaret as well. Very unhappy, unfulfilled that the Queen got a front row seat for.

I think it was right for Harry to leave. There is NO WAY I would want to spend my life in my brother’s shadow hoping for handouts simply by an accident of birth. I just wish his plan for financial independence didn’t involve tell-all books and Oprah interviews that directly play on his royal ties. I wish they had a real plan.