The new reign of King Charles III has begun

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Getting a kick about the two previous Kings named Charles. I knew a little English history but was unaware of all the beheadings, enemies being drawn & quartered (ouch!), judges given death sentences, digging up Cromwell's body & decapitating it, etc. Better not mess with Charles III! This could be more entertaining than reruns of the Sopranos.

your stupidity is showing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I miss the Elizabethan era already.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate just made Prince and Princess of Wales

Well that didn't take long
https://www.instagram.com/princeandprincessofwales/

Did you catch that they changed their handle to D of D of Cornwall and Cambridge when the Queen was still dead in her bed? The thirst is real.

It is tradition and what is expected. Please do some basic research and save yourself the embarrassment.

Her death was expected, not a surprise. Everything was prearranged and some social media communication guy had instructions to change it after official announcement. Its not like they did it themselves.

So what? Who cares if they didn't do it themselves! Get a grip.

Why are you foaming at the mouth? You should get a grip.

Why do people always say this when they have no response. LOL I am truly not "foaming". Please try to respond with a little more creativity but I expect you don't have any which is why you are parroting me! and accused me of foaming...

PPP: Tell her she's rabid -- she won't know what that means!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: That's so weird, to have your lastname be where your house is. Hi, my name is Larlo Baltimore.

Not so weird if you're Lord Baltimore.

Gah, now you are making me think of Lady Baltimore Cake which we always had at Christmas. Best cake ever!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate just made Prince and Princess of Wales

Well that didn't take long
https://www.instagram.com/princeandprincessofwales/

Did you catch that they changed their handle to D of D of Cornwall and Cambridge when the Queen was still dead in her bed? The thirst is real.

Seriously. Incredibly crass. Just yesterday they had immediately changed their title and handle to Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge. It's despicable, really.

Not as despicable as your lack of basic knowledge. If you know nothing about how any of this works, why are you so interested in it?

No one is talking about them acknowledging the titles with decorum. We’re talking about changing their social media handles twice in 24 hours.

That is part of the decorum. Again, get off social media and read anything that might make your brain expand just a tiny bit.

+1. I’m also cracking up at this poster who things W&K logged on and made those changes personally.

[Anonymous]

Do either of them speak Welsh?
Strange to be prince and princess of Wales when you have no connection to it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interestingly, Harrys children are not prince/princess, but Andrews are.
Technically they are entitled to that. I think the RF should not have excluded them.
Charles was wrong to say in his speech that they shall continue to live abroard. On the surface his speech sounded heartfelt, but the English speak between the lines.

The media hate against Meghan continues. Daily Mail says the crowd had stony faces when she met the crowds. But one commentator who was there said that was not so. I doubt that the rift between W & H is as bad as the press is making it out to be

As a child of immigrants, I always say never say never. They might just go live in England one day

The English are weird

Why do people like this poster keep repeating the lie that the Sussex children are not prince and princess now? They have every right to the title. As minors their parents have decide whether they want to use them for their children or not.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/palace-clarifies-why-meghan-harrys-142400292.html

This article would seem to indicate it was not automatic.

They should receive the titles under existing rules, but the sovereign (Charles) can change the rules. The children's titles wouldn't be awarded without agreement of their parents, but I also suspect that it's a point of negotiation, along with the things relating to H&M's relationship with the royal family going forward. If you were Charles, why would you grant their children titles if Harry is going to publish a tell all book any day now? I think I'd want to see what that book says first. Meghan's already lied (or, at best, proved that she was deeply confused) when she claimed to Oprah that her children had been denied their titles contrary to protocol. Charles really has nothing to lose here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do either of them speak Welsh?
Strange to be prince and princess of Wales when you have no connection to it

Wasn’t there a whole thing on The Crown about Charles trying to learn welsh because he stayed in wales and people were irked that he didn’t speak it? Or am I totally making that up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do either of them speak Welsh?
Strange to be prince and princess of Wales when you have no connection to it

Maybe they will learn Welsh before their investiture just as Charles did.

[Anonymous]

W&K lived in Wales for several years when William was a pilot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interestingly, Harrys children are not prince/princess, but Andrews are.
Technically they are entitled to that. I think the RF should not have excluded them.
Charles was wrong to say in his speech that they shall continue to live abroard. On the surface his speech sounded heartfelt, but the English speak between the lines.

The media hate against Meghan continues. Daily Mail says the crowd had stony faces when she met the crowds. But one commentator who was there said that was not so. I doubt that the rift between W & H is as bad as the press is making it out to be

As a child of immigrants, I always say never say never. They might just go live in England one day

The English are weird

Why do people like this poster keep repeating the lie that the Sussex children are not prince and princess now? They have every right to the title. As minors their parents have decide whether they want to use them for their children or not.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/palace-clarifies-why-meghan-harrys-142400292.html

This article would seem to indicate it was not automatic.

They should receive the titles under existing rules, but the sovereign (Charles) can change the rules. The children's titles wouldn't be awarded without agreement of their parents, but I also suspect that it's a point of negotiation, along with the things relating to H&M's relationship with the royal family going forward. If you were Charles, why would you grant their children titles if Harry is going to publish a tell all book any day now? I think I'd want to see what that book says first. Meghan's already lied (or, at best, proved that she was deeply confused) when she claimed to Oprah that her children had been denied their titles contrary to protocol. Charles really has nothing to lose here.

There already has been countless books published on the royal family, what is one more?
Why do you think there is an issue with Harry and Meghan going forward? Just because they don’t live in the UK, or just because they are not into the royal show? They have been villified in the press for everything and were just about chased out of the country

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I miss the Elizabethan era already.

I don't really remember...good hair tho

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interestingly, Harrys children are not prince/princess, but Andrews are.
Technically they are entitled to that. I think the RF should not have excluded them.
Charles was wrong to say in his speech that they shall continue to live abroard. On the surface his speech sounded heartfelt, but the English speak between the lines.

The media hate against Meghan continues. Daily Mail says the crowd had stony faces when she met the crowds. But one commentator who was there said that was not so. I doubt that the rift between W & H is as bad as the press is making it out to be

As a child of immigrants, I always say never say never. They might just go live in England one day

The English are weird

Why do people like this poster keep repeating the lie that the Sussex children are not prince and princess now? They have every right to the title. As minors their parents have decide whether they want to use them for their children or not.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/palace-clarifies-why-meghan-harrys-142400292.html

This article would seem to indicate it was not automatic.

They should receive the titles under existing rules, but the sovereign (Charles) can change the rules. The children's titles wouldn't be awarded without agreement of their parents, but I also suspect that it's a point of negotiation, along with the things relating to H&M's relationship with the royal family going forward. If you were Charles, why would you grant their children titles if Harry is going to publish a tell all book any day now? I think I'd want to see what that book says first. Meghan's already lied (or, at best, proved that she was deeply confused) when she claimed to Oprah that her children had been denied their titles contrary to protocol. Charles really has nothing to lose here.

There already has been countless books published on the royal family, what is one more?
Why do you think there is an issue with Harry and Meghan going forward? Just because they don’t live in the UK, or just because they are not into the royal show? They have been villified in the press for everything and were just about chased out of the country

There have never been any bookings written by people in the line of succession. So no, it’s not “just one more.” And no, they were most certainly not “chased out.” They threw a massive tantrum when they didn’t get what they wanted - to be “part time” royals, but not engage with the Royal Rota and be allowed to earn income.

[Anonymous]

I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t fault the Sussexes for wanting to become financially secure. If they hadn’t they would have still been dependent on allowances from Charles while William became independently wealthy.

Except they can’t also be working royals then. And if they aren’t working royals, they don’t get HRH or security. But rather than acknowledging their choice was the reason, Meghan wants to call racism.

So they can be financially independent, but then need to stop pouting about what they chose to walk away from.