
What a Shame ![]() |
Do people really think a random Columbia BA is a lottery ticket? Because it’s not. I wouldn’t worry about some weird Barnard girl — and they’re all weird — waltzing in and cleaning up six-figure job offers. Who cares what they claim or what they write on LinkedIn. |
Are you a Barnard parent? Just stop. |
Columbia grads are revered the world over. The 2nd Best College in the land. Better than Stanford. Better than Columbia. And in the greatest city on earth. |
No one other than US News thinks Columbia is better than Stanford. |
No. Yo stop. ![]() |
Barnard = Columbia > Stanford (Albeit per US News but they are the gospel. right?) Ludicrous? |
Stanford has a traction in DMV. No one in California holds in in awe. It's an outstanding school. People in California aren't surprised it's #6. |
Especially now with the manipulation of data Columbia has been employing. USNWR graduate school rankings just came out. It seems Columbia jumped there as well. Pure nonsense! |
Yeah, sure! |
Barnard being equal to Columbia is equally ludicrous that Columbia is better or more prestigious than Stanford. If Stanford manipulated the ranking systems as well as Columbia and Chicago it would be a clear #1! Columbia and Chicago must not be allowed to benefit from their virtuoso gaming of the systems. |
Funny how Columbia does that. But when it comes to reporting admissions data, they leave out SGS. Seems like Columbia includes colleges or leaves them out based on what is convenient for them. We know they lie blatantly, so why use them as a source for anything. |
Once upon a time the 7 Sister Schools were partnered with the Ivy all boys schools. Radcliffe was Harvard's girl's school for example. Radcliffe disappeared because it conjoined financially with Harvard. Barnard does not want to end up like that. Barnard runs its own finances and remains separate from Columbia College on that level. It's enrollment application is also separate. Barnard has its own campus too. Its requirements for graduation are different from Columbia College. It's administration and faculty are strictly Barnard hires. Columbia has its own seperate administration and department chairs. Barnard has its own alumni magazine, separate from Columbia's. Barnard's career office is also separate from Columbia's. It's health services are also separate. Its freshmen dorms are strictly Barnard girls. One may apply out into mixed dorms after Freshman year but that's unusual and an effort. So while students can criss-cross the campuses for classes, Barnard has its own different set of core requirements as well as financial budget. It is NOT Columbia College. It is NOT Columbia Engineering. And likewise, those schools are NOT Barnard. |
Let's face it, when someone says Columbia, the connotation is Columbia College. People who attend the other schools will specify that school - SIPA, Columbia Engineering, Columbia Architecture, Columbia Law, Columbia Business, etc... Most women who finished Barnard will say Barnard when asked where she attended college. For one's resume, one would state Columbia Law or Columbia Architecture, NOT simply state that they attended Columbia University. Anyone who states simply "Columbia University" on his/her resume runs the great risk of sounding like a GSAS student - School of General Studies. Basically, a money mill for the school that doesn't require much to get in and not much in the way of requirements. I think Harvard has a similar program called the "Extension School". So I wouldn't put just Columbia University on my resume, I'd get specific. And no, Barnard graduates don't get notifications about the CU Alumni Association. Believe, I know. I went to Barnard undergrad and Columbia for grad. There's a different pipeline for alumni news and events. |
Nobody cares. |