Single Issue Voter: Controlling The Borders

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

JUST IN: TX: An asylum seeker who crossed into the U.S. 4 months ago, is the suspect in the murder of a Houston man in his 40s—His body found in a home in the Eagle Pass area yesterday, according to Maverick County Sheriff Tom Schmerber.

64-year-old Roberto Emilio Vasquez-Santamaria is in custody in connection to the death—Sources confirm Vasquez-Santamaria from Peru, crossed into the U.S. in the Eagle Pass area back in May (5/7/23) and was released “due to a lack of space” with a notice to appear *virtually in June of 2025.

Sources say his address listed is in Florida, but the crime was committed in the same county he crossed into illegally.

The sheriff says during questioning, Vasquez-Santamaria admitted to arguing with the victim but denied killing anyone. The body was found in a home “known to authorities” as a possible “stash house.”

Vasquez-Santamaria is currently in the sheriff’s custody with an ICE detainer—I am told if he bonds out, ICE will go pick him up.

The Sheriff tells me they are worried about what’s coming through, “Not everyone is coming through looking for a better life.”

Understatement of the past few years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another caravan heading to the US.

This must have been staged. "Caravans" simply don't exist. Right, LWNJs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regardless of my party affiliation/registration, I will vote based on one issue--strict control of our borders.

Other than right to life/abortion issue is anyone else approaching the next presidential election as a single issue voter ?

If other than right to life/abortion, what is that issue ?

Biden has dedicated more money to border control.
He has authorized more drones and other equipment as requested from DHS.
He has more drug recovery than Trump.
He has more human interdictions than Trump.
He has more deportations than Trump.
He has invested more in Central America to address the root issues of people wanting to emigrate.

So to answer your question, you should be voting Democrat.

Uh, no.

Democrats have all 3 branches of government for the past 2 years…this problem got out of control with Biden in charge. So if so lot understand how having open borders and having millions of people cross over will be better by having Democrats staying in control?

Also throwing more money at the problem like more, judges, agents, surveillance won’t fix the issue if another 2million people cross the border next year. How many 100’s of billions of dollars do yo you want to spend on this? How many more crowded schools do you need that can’t get the kids in? How many more hotels in NY will be filled with migrants? Why is there suddenly billions of dollars available for this when we did not have billions of dollars to help our homeless, veterans, minority communities???????

Are you forgetting the Caravans during the Trump years? How short our memory is.

And...the Dems have offered an immigration reform bill that covers a lot of issues, but guess who votes against it? The GOP. Why? Because they want to keep people like you angry, rather than, you know, dealing with the problem.

Also, you say "uh, no" but the facts matter, the current Administration has recovered more drugs, indicted more people, deported more illegal people, etc than the Trump Administration did. Maybe research it a little before commenting next time.

You are absolutely right but they don’t care about facts or evidence.

I had to laugh at the bolded. Let's consider why that might be. Think think think... I have faith that you'll stumble upon the correct answer soon!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regardless of my party affiliation/registration, I will vote based on one issue--strict control of our borders.

Other than right to life/abortion issue is anyone else approaching the next presidential election as a single issue voter ?

If other than right to life/abortion, what is that issue ?

Biden has dedicated more money to border control.
He has authorized more drones and other equipment as requested from DHS.
He has more drug recovery than Trump.
He has more human interdictions than Trump.
He has more deportations than Trump.
He has invested more in Central America to address the root issues of people wanting to emigrate.

So to answer your question, you should be voting Democrat.

Uh, no.

Democrats have all 3 branches of government for the past 2 years…this problem got out of control with Biden in charge. So if so lot understand how having open borders and having millions of people cross over will be better by having Democrats staying in control?

Also throwing more money at the problem like more, judges, agents, surveillance won’t fix the issue if another 2million people cross the border next year. How many 100’s of billions of dollars do yo you want to spend on this? How many more crowded schools do you need that can’t get the kids in? How many more hotels in NY will be filled with migrants? Why is there suddenly billions of dollars available for this when we did not have billions of dollars to help our homeless, veterans, minority communities???????

Are you forgetting the Caravans during the Trump years? How short our memory is.

And...the Dems have offered an immigration reform bill that covers a lot of issues, but guess who votes against it? The GOP. Why? Because they want to keep people like you angry, rather than, you know, dealing with the problem.

Also, you say "uh, no" but the facts matter, the current Administration has recovered more drugs, indicted more people, deported more illegal people, etc than the Trump Administration did. Maybe research it a little before commenting next time.

You are absolutely right but they don’t care about facts or evidence.

I had to laugh at the bolded. Let's consider why that might be. Think think think... I have faith that you'll stumble upon the correct answer soon!

It’s like saying that America has more blondes than Denmark, and more black people than Namibia. Technically true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is the only evidence needed to refute any claim that the border is secure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what Biden has enabled. It will be his legacy.

Children usually arrive in the United States with some idea of who might take them in: either a parent or sibling or, about half the time, a more distant relative or family friend. While parents and siblings often support the children who come to live with them, other adults are more likely to take children in only on the condition that they work and pay rent. Of the dozens of children who have been released to sponsors in and around Parksley during the past three years, more than 90 percent have gone to adults who are not their parents.

LOL, no it is the GOP governors who are amending the child labor laws in the US that enable companies to do this. That isn't a Biden thing. That is a Gov Sanders of Ark, Gov DeSantis of FL, Gov Youngkin of VA etc who are responsible. And also, the GOP owned companies that hire these children.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

JUST IN: TX: An asylum seeker who crossed into the U.S. 4 months ago, is the suspect in the murder of a Houston man in his 40s—His body found in a home in the Eagle Pass area yesterday, according to Maverick County Sheriff Tom Schmerber.

64-year-old Roberto Emilio Vasquez-Santamaria is in custody in connection to the death—Sources confirm Vasquez-Santamaria from Peru, crossed into the U.S. in the Eagle Pass area back in May (5/7/23) and was released “due to a lack of space” with a notice to appear *virtually in June of 2025.

Sources say his address listed is in Florida, but the crime was committed in the same county he crossed into illegally.

The sheriff says during questioning, Vasquez-Santamaria admitted to arguing with the victim but denied killing anyone. The body was found in a home “known to authorities” as a possible “stash house.”

Vasquez-Santamaria is currently in the sheriff’s custody with an ICE detainer—I am told if he bonds out, ICE will go pick him up.

The Sheriff tells me they are worried about what’s coming through, “Not everyone is coming through looking for a better life.”

Understatement of the past few years.

And thusly, why another poster stated that you folks cherry pick individual incidents and make general conclusions about what is happening, what is working, what to do. This is a perfect example of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is the only evidence needed to refute any claim that the border is secure.

It's not really. It's one person. And criminals have been coming across for decades. Going underground, digging tunnels, scaling walls.

And honestly, you're expecting me to care a lot about this when we already disregard the safety of our citizens and police forces with our lax gun laws. So, excuse me if I don't take your concerns about crime coming from brown people south of the border seriously w/o you also taking the other violent gun crimes already occurring in our country seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is the only evidence needed to refute any claim that the border is secure.

It's not really. It's one person. And criminals have been coming across for decades. Going underground, digging tunnels, scaling walls.

And honestly, you're expecting me to care a lot about this when we already disregard the safety of our citizens and police forces with our lax gun laws. So, excuse me if I don't take your concerns about crime coming from brown people south of the border seriously w/o you also taking the other violent gun crimes already occurring in our country seriously.

Deported nine times. Deported nine times. His criminality is irrelevant to the fact.

Also, why do you think I don't take violent gun crimes seriously? Because I do.

No, your concern isn't gun crimes... it's gun control, and that is not relevant to this thread. So take it elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is the only evidence needed to refute any claim that the border is secure.

It's not really. It's one person. And criminals have been coming across for decades. Going underground, digging tunnels, scaling walls.

And honestly, you're expecting me to care a lot about this when we already disregard the safety of our citizens and police forces with our lax gun laws. So, excuse me if I don't take your concerns about crime coming from brown people south of the border seriously w/o you also taking the other violent gun crimes already occurring in our country seriously.

Deported nine times. Deported nine times. His criminality is irrelevant to the fact.

Also, why do you think I don't take violent gun crimes seriously? Because I do.

No, your concern isn't gun crimes... it's gun control, and that is not relevant to this thread. So take it elsewhere.

And yet, still a single person. And unless you're the admin, I'll take it whereever I please. Lack of gun control = gun violence/crimes, number 1. Number 2, I don't believe you take anything seriously with your cherrypicked anecdote as evidence arguments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is the only evidence needed to refute any claim that the border is secure.

It's not really. It's one person. And criminals have been coming across for decades. Going underground, digging tunnels, scaling walls.

And honestly, you're expecting me to care a lot about this when we already disregard the safety of our citizens and police forces with our lax gun laws. So, excuse me if I don't take your concerns about crime coming from brown people south of the border seriously w/o you also taking the other violent gun crimes already occurring in our country seriously.

Deported nine times. Deported nine times. His criminality is irrelevant to the fact.

Also, why do you think I don't take violent gun crimes seriously? Because I do.

No, your concern isn't gun crimes... it's gun control, and that is not relevant to this thread. So take it elsewhere.

And yet, still a single person. And unless you're the admin, I'll take it whereever I please. Lack of gun control = gun violence/crimes, number 1. Number 2, I don't believe you take anything seriously with your cherrypicked anecdote as evidence arguments.

DP.
But, it is not just a single incident.

Here is yet another of a migrant killing a citizen. This one a child.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12488671/Migrant-35-caused-school-bus-crash-11-year-old-Ohio-boy-died-26-students-injured-previously-caught-released-border.html

Or, maybe you heard about the 1 YO killed by fentanyl poisoning in a NY day care center. Yep, the man living in that apt. who owned the fentanyl - here illegally. And, the owner of the daycare center? Not a US citizen. From the Dominican Republic.

[Anonymous]

Remember back when this administration was preparing for the repeal of Title 42. It wasn't that long ago. May, 2023.
Remember what this administration said regarding illegally crossings?

Mayorkas specifically said......That anyone who crosses the border illegally will be removed from the US via Title 8 and will have a five year bar from reentry to the US and can face criminal prosecution if they attempt to enter again.

Hear his comments here:
https://www.dhs.gov/medialibrary/assets/videos/43020

This is happening TODAY:

Everything Mayorkas said was a flat out lie. They are NOT deporting those who enter illegally under Title 8.

Here is what Art Del Cuerto has to say about Mayorkas' empty promises and lies.

Art Del Cueto, Vice President of the US Border Patrol Council, explains how nothing Joe Biden, or Secretary Mayorkas are saying is true. The illegals that Secretary Mayorkas said were going to be deported after Title 42 ended using Title 8 have gotten the memo that all they have to do is appeal and they will be allowed to stay with a notice to appears potentially 2-5+ years from now, just like most the rest of the illegals have been.

It’s all a lie - Joe Biden’s invasion continues! They’re not even trying to stop it. They’ve simply changed the name from illegal to legal! The question is, are they being paid off by the cartels or just selling out America on their own?


Now, why should he not be impeached?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what Biden has enabled. It will be his legacy.

Children usually arrive in the United States with some idea of who might take them in: either a parent or sibling or, about half the time, a more distant relative or family friend. While parents and siblings often support the children who come to live with them, other adults are more likely to take children in only on the condition that they work and pay rent. Of the dozens of children who have been released to sponsors in and around Parksley during the past three years, more than 90 percent have gone to adults who are not their parents.

LOL, no it is the GOP governors who are amending the child labor laws in the US that enable companies to do this. That isn't a Biden thing. That is a Gov Sanders of Ark, Gov DeSantis of FL, Gov Youngkin of VA etc who are responsible. And also, the GOP owned companies that hire these children.

+1

Simon Rosenberg can suck a big one. Then, he can brush up on the law.

It is federal law that NOBODY UNDER THE AGE OF 18 CAN WORK IN MEAT PACKING PLANTS.

[Anonymous]

No matter how bad the border issue is, I could never vote for anyone who thinks as a woman. I have less rights than a corpse over my own body