This response makes no damn sense. It is completely irrational, and has no bearing whatsoever to whether the police department should be abolished. |
False ridiculous analogy. |
People like you are impossible to have a conversation with. You start shouting “defund the police!” So someone asks you, ok, why? Instead of pointing to any evidence whatsoever to back your platform (yes btw this word doesn’t only mean twitter, it can also mean your cause), you just attack them and say “well if you don’t agree with me you must be racist. It’s impossible to learn from or have a meaningful conversation with people like that, and you’re going to need people on your side to pull off something like this. Try talking to people instead of just insulting them. Try pointing to resources, like I dunno, maybe the Office of Police Complaints? Maybe the independent review of MPD use of force that was done in 2018? Saying the data doesn’t exist just isn’t true. But surely you knew of these resources, since you’re so invested in this cause. The only thing I agree with one of these posters is that I am definitely an idiot for thinking I could get any useful information out of DCUM. |
| Do people want anarchy? Cause that’s what happens when there is no police. |
Could you point me to evidence or studies that support this? |
| You can relax. When someone sticks a gun in your face, assaults you, or is climbing through your window at 3 am. you’ll be able to call Councilmembers White, Allen, or Nadeau. They’ll immediately rally their posse of virtue signalers and cancel culture warriors and hash tag the malcontent into stopping the transgression. |
| I recently learned from activists that defund the police doesn’t mean abolish the police it means cut their funding down to limit spending on weapons and surveillance tech. That makes sense to me. Horrible slogan though. |
It means different things to different people. Most seem to mean more extensive changes than what you described, although not as radical as truly disbanding the police altogether. |
Organized crime. Pay for protection. |
|
Eliminating the police WILL finally halt gentrification! It’ll stop it in it’s tracks.
Not too mention instantly boost home prices in the close-in suburbs by a couple hundred thousand bucks overnight. |
You do realize that cops can be sued in civil court (and be personally responsible for financial damages) if they are found liable for serious misconduct/failure to follow their departments procedures? |
A majority of Minneapolis council members want to dismantle the city’s police department because, in their view, it cannot be reformed. The term “defund” is not defined as merely reducing funding to something; it’s defined as preventing something from receiving funding. I suspect more Americans mentally associate the term with disbanding or dismantling the police, just like we we’re seeing in Minneapolis. Reforming the police is a policy position that is likely understood and accepted by a majority of Americans. Defunding the police will meet significant opposition by voters, and will likely hurt Democrats politically in November. If the “activists” don’t mean “dismantle the police” when they say “defund the police”, then they need a new tagline...quickly. |
|
Democrats:
Dismantle and defund the police. Abolish ICE Allow illegal immigration. Jesus F'in Christ. The party of lawlessness needs to be abolished. |
| [youtube]https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tC_5mp3udE[/youtube] |
| http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tC_5mp3udE |