new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yep. He liiiiiieeeeeeed at his hearings.

You hear that, Republicurds? You supported a sexual assaulted and a liar.

Not the first time. Remember Clarence Thomas? Nothing will happen to Kàvanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Trump received 3 million fewer votes than his competition and appointed one justice to stolen seat and another credibly accused of sexual harrasment

Senators who voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh represented 22 million and 38 mil fewer Americans than senators who opposed them.

We have a tyranny of the minority in the United States.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump received 3 million fewer votes than his competition and appointed one justice to stolen seat and another credibly accused of sexual harrasment

Senators who voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh represented 22 million and 38 mil fewer Americans than senators who opposed them.

We have a tyranny of the minority in the United States.

Yea we do and they still sound like victimized howler monkeys. “Meeeeee meeee meeeee! I’m underrepresented! Meeeeee! Everyone else’s issues is identity politics, big everything I like is super duper the most important!!!! White Christians are victims!! White men have no rights!!!!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump received 3 million fewer votes than his competition and appointed one justice to stolen seat and another credibly accused of sexual harrasment

Senators who voted to confirm Gorsuch and Kavanaugh represented 22 million and 38 mil fewer Americans than senators who opposed them.

We have a tyranny of the minority in the United States.

Yea we do and they still sound like victimized howler monkeys. “Meeeeee meeee meeeee! I’m underrepresented! Meeeeee! Everyone else’s issues is identity politics, big everything I like is super duper the most important!!!! White Christians are victims!! White men have no rights!!!!”

Yup. It's pathetic. At least their days are numbered, though they may hold the Senate for a while.

Statehood for DC and PR!

[Anonymous]

Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

[Anonymous]

The Federalist. Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Have you ever considered, maybe, that YOU are being played?

Do you know who funds the Federalist or what its role in judicial nominees are?

[Anonymous]

Read Mollie's book. Unlike the excerpts from this book, hers were sourced. Almost all sources were named. You know, journalism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Read Mollie's book. Unlike the excerpts from this book, hers were sourced. Almost all sources were named. You know, journalism.

Exactly. NYTimes no longer exhibits journalistic standards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct)
And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep. He liiiiiieeeeeeed at his hearings.

You hear that, Republicurds? You supported a sexual assaulted and a liar.

Not the first time. Remember Clarence Thomas? Nothing will happen to Kàvanaugh.

I watched much of the Thomas hearings. I remember that he was NOT accused of sexual assault. Moreover, I never understood why Anita Hill followed him to other jobs after the supposed harassment occurred. You do know that she did that? Moreover, she never indicated that she was worried about his behavior--took a ride to the airport from him, for example. Would you do that if someone were harassing you?

Anita Hill's accusations were not credible, but the Dems and media have made her into a folk hero.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct)
And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes.

What are you even talking about? Of course the NY Times reporters did - you know - reporting. What in the world would ever make you say otherwise?

Trump tweeting about how great MH's book is tells you all you need to know - partisan dreck designed to please King Tiny Hands and his idiot minions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct)
And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes.

What are you even talking about? Of course the NY Times reporters did - you know - reporting. What in the world would ever make you say otherwise?[b]

Trump tweeting about how great MH's book is tells you all you need to know - partisan dreck designed to please King Tiny Hands and his idiot minions

These "reporters" did not talk to Stier. They did not talk to the woman who reportedly was the "victim" in this story. All of their reporting is through 2nd or 3rd hand accounts.
That is NOT the way to source a story and any journalist worthy of any credibility knows that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, seems kind of important....
Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful.

According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."

But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces

Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift.

And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable?

You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?

Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct)
And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes.

What are you even talking about? Of course the NY Times reporters did - you know - reporting. What in the world would ever make you say otherwise?[b]

Trump tweeting about how great MH's book is tells you all you need to know - partisan dreck designed to please King Tiny Hands and his idiot minions

These "reporters" did not talk to Stier. They did not talk to the woman who reportedly was the "victim" in this story. All of their reporting is through 2nd or 3rd hand accounts.
That is NOT the way to source a story and any journalist worthy of any credibility knows that.

I’m assuming you’re GOP, which means you’ve sworn fealty to the guy who uses the old Nazi terms to demonize journalists and mainstream media, which means you have exactly zero standing to criticize the media.