Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yeah, seems kind of important.... Liberals are being played yet again. These reporters have a book to sell. Their sourcing is crap. They did not talk to ONE of the people headlined in their story. Pitiful. [quote]According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly." But the Times' article did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question denied any knowledge of the alleged episode. [b]"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," noted The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."[/b][/quote] https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kavanaugh-must-be-impeached-harris-says-as-new-uncorroborated-allegation-surfaces[/quote] Mollie Hemingway used to be a decent person. At some point she decided there was more $ to be made doing the right wing grift. And yes, they have a book coming out- you think that the info being in a book means it's *less* reliable? You know Mollie Hemingway also wrote a book about Kavanaugh, if that's your standard?[/quote] Are you claiming that what Mollie Hemingway has stated is not true? (Hint: She is correct) And, the book Hemingway authored is excellent and full of source material. She and her co-author actually *talked* to people they reported on. Unlike these two from the NYTimes. [/quote] [b]What are you even talking about? Of course the NY Times reporters did - you know - reporting. What in the world would ever make you say otherwise?[/b][b] Trump tweeting about how great MH's book is tells you all you need to know - partisan dreck designed to please King Tiny Hands and his idiot minions[/quote] These "reporters" did not talk to Stier. They did not talk to the woman who reportedly was the "victim" in this story. All of their reporting is through 2nd or 3rd hand accounts. That is NOT the way to source a story and any journalist worthy of any credibility knows that. [/quote] I’m assuming you’re GOP, which means you’ve sworn fealty to the guy who uses the old Nazi terms to demonize journalists and mainstream media, which means you have exactly zero standing to criticize the media.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics