Rose Hanbury sat at Prince William’s table

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

Considering that Philip's longest and most serious lover is her own first cousin (and his), Princess Alexandra, banishment would be a bigger scandal than the affair. Kate demanding William "phase Rose out" was always going to backfire. Rose knows the aristo game, Kate does not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

She looks underfed and greasy.

[Anonymous]

The best theory is that the report was planted by Rose.

Kate wanted her phased out
Rose took revenge. Revenge on either attempting to cut her off, revenge on breaking up their affair, and/or revenge on making will end it.

IF you read the original article.......... it’s soooo cruel of you think about the “source” being rose herself.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8701009/kate-middleton-best-friend-prince-william-phase-out/

Specifically:

“William wants to play peacemaker so the two couples can remain friends, given they live so close to each other and share many mutual friends.

“But Kate has been clear that she doesn’t want to see them any more and wants William to phase them out, despite their social status.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

Considering that Philip's longest and most serious lover is her own first cousin (and his), Princess Alexandra, banishment would be a bigger scandal than the affair. Kate demanding William "phase Rose out" was always going to backfire. Rose knows the aristo game, Kate does not.

Link? Proof of Alexandra and Philip?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The best theory is that the report was planted by Rose.

Kate wanted her phased out
Rose took revenge. Revenge on either attempting to cut her off, revenge on breaking up their affair, and/or revenge on making will end it.

IF you read the original article.......... it’s soooo cruel of you think about the “source” being rose herself.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8701009/kate-middleton-best-friend-prince-william-phase-out/

Specifically:

“William wants to play peacemaker so the two couples can remain friends, given they live so close to each other and share many mutual friends.

“But Kate has been clear that she doesn’t want to see them any more and wants William to phase them out, despite their social status.”

Sometimes I wonder if Kate just didn't realize what she was ASKING for.

She's only been interested in tiara events and going back to her boltholes in the countryside since marriage. Maybe she had no idea what the Marquess of Cholmondeley did and how important his role was in state functions?

Functions he has to be at, his wife has to be at, and increasingly William will have to be at as he continues to transition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

Considering that Philip's longest and most serious lover is her own first cousin (and his), Princess Alexandra, banishment would be a bigger scandal than the affair. Kate demanding William "phase Rose out" was always going to backfire. Rose knows the aristo game, Kate does not.

Link? Proof of Alexandra and Philip?

There is no proof, just decades of salacious rumors. Because a) the Queen wasn't stupid enough to speak up about it like Kate, and b) Prince Phillip wasn't stupid enough to divorce his wife for her like Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

Considering that Philip's longest and most serious lover is her own first cousin (and his), Princess Alexandra, banishment would be a bigger scandal than the affair. Kate demanding William "phase Rose out" was always going to backfire. Rose knows the aristo game, Kate does not.

Link? Proof of Alexandra and Philip?

There is no proof, just decades of salacious rumors. Because a) the Queen wasn't stupid enough to speak up about it like Kate, and b) Prince Phillip wasn't stupid enough to divorce his wife for her like Charles.

I can't find a link of rumors even.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

Considering that Philip's longest and most serious lover is her own first cousin (and his), Princess Alexandra, banishment would be a bigger scandal than the affair. Kate demanding William "phase Rose out" was always going to backfire. Rose knows the aristo game, Kate does not.

Link? Proof of Alexandra and Philip?

There is no proof, just decades of salacious rumors. Because a) the Queen wasn't stupid enough to speak up about it like Kate, and b) Prince Phillip wasn't stupid enough to divorce his wife for her like Charles.

I can't find a link of rumors even.

It’s supposed to feature on the next season of The Crown. That’ll probably bring out links to all the old articles.

[Anonymous]

David Rocksavage once pictured walking to a church service with Carole Middleton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

Considering that Philip's longest and most serious lover is her own first cousin (and his), Princess Alexandra, banishment would be a bigger scandal than the affair. Kate demanding William "phase Rose out" was always going to backfire. Rose knows the aristo game, Kate does not.

Link? Proof of Alexandra and Philip?

There is no proof, just decades of salacious rumors. Because a) the Queen wasn't stupid enough to speak up about it like Kate, and b) Prince Phillip wasn't stupid enough to divorce his wife for her like Charles.

I can't find a link of rumors even.

It’s supposed to feature on the next season of The Crown. That’ll probably bring out links to all the old articles.

Royal Foibles has great breakdowns.

https://www.royalfoibles.com/princess-margarets-revenge/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4975075/prince-philip-affair-pat-kirkwood-sacha-abercorn-rumours/

As Sarah Bradford put it bluntly in her biography of the Queen, Elizabeth, what Her Majesty has always expected from her husband is loyalty rather than fidelity. A natural born ladies man who cheated on the Queen throughout their courtship, Elizabeth was willing to turn a blind eye to her husband’s peccadillos as long as he was willing to be discrete about them. She expected her courtiers to exercise the same discretion around her when word got back to them regarding Philip’s extramarital adventures. Bradford writes the pitiful tale in her book of a lady-in-waiting who chose to inform the Queen of her husband’s latest mistress. Met with stony silence, the lady was sacked shortly thereafter, and not long after that committed suicide.

...

Prior to 1955, despite the growing emotional distance between them, the Queen was naively willing to believe her husband when he assured her he wasn’t the dirty stomp around it was often whispered he was. All that changed, according to Lady Campbell, when her beloved, trusted little sister, whom she’d grown up with and whom she was closer to than almost anyone else, certainly almost any other woman in her life up till that time, vindictively informed her of everything her husband was really doing every Thursday night when he was in London; described the gatherings in graphic detail; and informed her that everyone around the Queen already knew about it. Margaret then stormed out of the room, slammed the door shut, and didn’t speak to her sister for a year. As Campbell explains, it’s one thing for an ordinary person to be humiliated by their philandering spouse, but for a monarch to be humiliated in such a manner in front of all their inner circle, who are their nominal subjects, is more embarrassment than most sane people can bear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still it’s possible. But why have people ruled out other possibilities:
-rose did something else very cruel to Kate. Repeatedly made fun of her, made fun of her kids, cut her out of social events cruelly, etc.
-maybe it didn’t escalate but maybe rose sent William sexts or something that triggered a confessional to Kate

They've been close friends since George was born. Kate showed up at Houghton Hall's (Rose's estate) horse trials for THREE years with her kids. She couldn't even be bothered to attend Ascot for that many times in her first six years of marriage. That's in addition to co-hosting a gala with the Cholmondeley's which the Cambridge's have never done for or with anyone else.

Yeah, no. Rose was happy being Kate's bosom buddy but William found out about Rose's wild side (her 20s were a lot more scandalous than Kate) and figured he could get some hot sex out of it.

When Kate learned what he'd done she abruptly cut off Rose cold-turkey and then tried to order the rest of the aristos to do the same. The problem was and remains hat Rose is both richer and more blue blooded than Kate is and William isn't playing ball either.

I'm not even sure Kate could have accomplished what she tried had she been the actual Princess of Wales. Apparently the Queen didn't try to banish any of Prince Phillip's lovers.

Considering that Philip's longest and most serious lover is her own first cousin (and his), Princess Alexandra, banishment would be a bigger scandal than the affair. Kate demanding William "phase Rose out" was always going to backfire. Rose knows the aristo game, Kate does not.

Link? Proof of Alexandra and Philip?

There is no proof, just decades of salacious rumors. Because a) the Queen wasn't stupid enough to speak up about it like Kate, and b) Prince Phillip wasn't stupid enough to divorce his wife for her like Charles.

I can't find a link of rumors even.

It’s supposed to feature on the next season of The Crown. That’ll probably bring out links to all the old articles.

Royal Foibles has great breakdowns.

https://www.royalfoibles.com/princess-margarets-revenge/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4975075/prince-philip-affair-pat-kirkwood-sacha-abercorn-rumours/

As Sarah Bradford put it bluntly in her biography of the Queen, Elizabeth, what Her Majesty has always expected from her husband is loyalty rather than fidelity. A natural born ladies man who cheated on the Queen throughout their courtship, Elizabeth was willing to turn a blind eye to her husband’s peccadillos as long as he was willing to be discrete about them. She expected her courtiers to exercise the same discretion around her when word got back to them regarding Philip’s extramarital adventures. Bradford writes the pitiful tale in her book of a lady-in-waiting who chose to inform the Queen of her husband’s latest mistress. Met with stony silence, the lady was sacked shortly thereafter, and not long after that committed suicide.

...

Prior to 1955, despite the growing emotional distance between them, the Queen was naively willing to believe her husband when he assured her he wasn’t the dirty stomp around it was often whispered he was. All that changed, according to Lady Campbell, when her beloved, trusted little sister, whom she’d grown up with and whom she was closer to than almost anyone else, certainly almost any other woman in her life up till that time, vindictively informed her of everything her husband was really doing every Thursday night when he was in London; described the gatherings in graphic detail; and informed her that everyone around the Queen already knew about it. Margaret then stormed out of the room, slammed the door shut, and didn’t speak to her sister for a year. As Campbell explains, it’s one thing for an ordinary person to be humiliated by their philandering spouse, but for a monarch to be humiliated in such a manner in front of all their inner circle, who are their nominal subjects, is more embarrassment than most sane people can bear.

That is just his normal affairs. This in particular is the story of Princess Alexandra of Kent: The Cousin Who Betrayed The Queen

https://www.royalfoibles.com/the-cousin-who-betrayed-the-queen/

[Anonymous]

The amazing thing is that Alexandra still looks great in old-age and apparently they made up because the Queen honored her for her work in 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The amazing thing is that Alexandra still looks great in old-age and apparently they made up because the Queen honored her for her work in 2016.

I don't know or care about her but I hardly think that means they made up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amazing thing is that Alexandra still looks great in old-age and apparently they made up because the Queen honored her for her work in 2016.

I don't know or care about her but I hardly think that means they made up.

Yes, after reading the story I can see the Queen would put a show on for everybody before she allowed the...50-year? affair to shame her publicly before the country. At this point, Alexandra deserved no less than a public show of gratitude for all her work over the years.