Rose Hanbury sat at Prince William’s table

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

HEADS UP, IT'S THE ANTI-KATE TROLL AGAIN POSTING AS DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

+1. It was quiet for awhile. Back with a vengeance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

HEADS UP, IT'S THE ANTI-KATE TROLL AGAIN POSTING AS DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

No, it's not. I love Kate but I can accept that occasionally she has a bad night. The dress was ugly. Chill out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.

It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!

The Kate halter is back. Must have killed you to go so long w/o posting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.

It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!

The Kate halter is back. Must have killed you to go so long w/o posting.

Are you a bot? You keep saying the same thing over and over, while people tell you that hating Kate's dress does not equal hating Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Bad hair, sad little tits, and a pinched face. Is that the look now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Bad hair, sad little tits, and a pinched face. Is that the look now?

It has been for quite a while. Besides which the Windsor men seem to almost not exclusively care about looks - *cough* Camilla *end cough*.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.

It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!

The Kate halter is back. Must have killed you to go so long w/o posting.

Are you a bot? You keep saying the same thing over and over, while people tell you that hating Kate's dress does not equal hating Kate.

Different poster but really, there is at least one kate hater (hard to tell how many because it seems like she posts responses to her own posts) - you can spot her a mile away. She always uses juvenile language, posts lots of pictures, and don’t get her mad because she will call you names!! I’m surprised she’s stayed quiet so long- this troll loves to stir the pot!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.

It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!

I disagree. Kate looks regal. This woman looks like she walked in from Forever 21.

+100

[Anonymous]

Guy here. Kate looks amazing. That other chick looks sleazy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guy here. Kate looks amazing. That other chick looks sleazy

Sleezy works for mistresses world-wide. Camilla didn't get where she is by being prudish. Phone sex was the name of the game in the 90s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Bad hair, sad little tits, and a pinched face. Is that the look now?

The draping fails to create the appearance of a waist.

[Anonymous]

That look is not at all comparable to Carolyn Bessette. That may be what she aspired to, but it missed by a mile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guy here. Kate looks amazing. That other chick looks sleazy

Sleezy works for mistresses world-wide. Camilla didn't get where she is by being prudish. Phone sex was the name of the game in the 90s.

Also she wore the same dress when Kate had her invited as a personal guest in 2017.



Harry attended his very first state banquet on Wednesday – and found himself seated next to a former fashion model, who also happens to be a close friend of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Rose and 57-year-old David, who is more than 20 years her senior, live just three miles from William and Kate's Norfolk manor, Anmer Hall.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2017071340604/prince-harry-rose-hanbury-spanish-state-banquet/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No ring on. Looking scandalously good.

Bad hair, sad little tits, and a pinched face. Is that the look now?

The draping fails to create the appearance of a waist.

Newsflash - the draping fails to create the appearance of a waist because she's PREGNANT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.

It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!

I disagree. Kate looks regal. This woman looks like she walked in from Forever 21.

Regal yes, but I love the way Kate dresses, and that's among the worst dresses I've ever seen her wear. I can only think it's a protest dress against having to be seen with Donald Trump (who said she deserved it when the paparazzi snapped photos of her sunbathing topless in her private rental home in France.

Nope. Ugly is standard for Kate and this dress is far from the worst she’s worn to a state banquet.

I hated that blue state banquet dress too, but the one from today is far worse.

She looks so old.

Be nice. She had three kids. Be nice.

So it’s mean to state the truth?