Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Questioning doesn't make you an a**hole. It means you simply have questions b/c you want to discover the truth. Sheeple don't question; they follow with blinders on. There are two sides to every story. That's why we have defense lawyers and prosecutors. In theory, both sides are innocent until proven guilty. So those two men caught on tape could be completely innocent, too. People are only questioning b/c there are quite a few holes in this story. It doesn't mean Smollet is lying, but it also doesn't mean he's sharing the ENTIRE truth. |
So, according to the article, he was on the phone during the attack: The subject line is accurate based on this bit of evidence . . . ok. However, the entire situation is still odd, especially since he refuses to turn over his phone. |
+1 You are physically attacked, assaulted, attacked for you race and sexuality, but won’t turn over your phone? It just screams hoax. |
when more details came out. my initial post reflected the initial reporting i'd seen. like many stories, this one is evolving. |
The phone is not an important detail. I wouldn't give my phone to the police if I didn't have to. |
So . . . if someone put a "not-a-noose" rope around your neck, supposedly dragged you and yelled homophobic slurs at you, you'd keep your phone, too. ok . . . Then you, too, would have something to hide. If the dude's life was at stake, the phone would mean very little to him. Furthermore, if he's an actor, he has money for another phone. And at this point, I would think MOST people would at least change their number. |
I disagree. It is an important detail. It would show 1) whether he was on the phone with Moore and 2) if he was on the phone, exactly when the attack happened. It could help police narrow their search of video in the area. |
Y'all are very trusting of the police. |
As a white woman, maybe I am. Is that the angle you're taking? |
|
That’s what I thought. The police could use his phone to pinpoint the specific area he was attacked. They could use that info to find security cameras.
Why he won’t allow that is crazy. It only leads to speculation it’s a hoax. If he truly was attacked he’d help the police in anyway possible. He’s hiding something. |
If you were attacked and police requested your phone you’d say no? And predictable dcum: suddenly the POLICE ARE EVIL!!! |
But they are refusing to turn over the cell phones |
I am a white woman - and I posted above that my dh (an attorney) would not let me hand my phone over to the police in this situation. All they need is the time of the call and they could use a screen shot I text them for that. It isn't about buying a phone. It is about the huge amount of personal data on the phone that is irrelevant to this attack. |
This isn't sudden. It is a sentiment that has been growing for some time, now. Yet, they would be the first to dial 9-1-1 if someone dare trespass on their property. |
Yeah, it does make you an a**hole. When you hear the story and you are like, he is clearly lying because Subway closes at 11!!!! Or he is clearly lying because police asked for surveillance video and no one has a video of the attack! Yeah, you are an a**hole. Just own it. |