They would not be majority asian. They would be about 40%-50% asian. Probably about the even with whites. And top schools would have fewer women. At the far right hand side of the curve, there are a lot more men than women. |
He almost certainly did not. What's the point? |
“But the easiest way for many competitive schools to fix their gender ratios lies in the selection process, at which point admissions officers often informally privilege male applicants, a tendency that critics say amounts to affirmative action for men.” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/magazine/men-college-enrollment.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare |
You mean that one that takes all of the tests. I've heard their English. It's not that good. |
Oh you fool Asian men make more than white men. That's why they weren't listed in the above post. And a wage Gap you utter tool of a human is when you're comparing two people who do the same work. |
So you are saying meritocracy doesn't really exist... If it truly does, then you wouldn't need to go out of your way to "impress". As a fellow immigrant, I will have to say this is an incredibly naive take. The avoidance approach makes you part of the systemic effort to exclude and oppress based on whatever criteria the power at be choose. This unfortunately is how the model immigrants have learned to cope and survive in this country. We first try to work hard to prove our worth, then to try hard to impress, when we are told we simply are cut out for the C-suites or whatever, we kowtow and retreat to carve a space in the corner where it doesn't pose a threat. One thing you said I agree, the old boys network is a culture decision. Then we need to break that, not allow it to fester and continue onwards. DEI, while not perfectly executed all the time everywhere, is an attempt. Now that attempt is being forcefully ended. So will the world be better with or without it? or do you rather continue to be ignored and dismissed by the way the old boys network? |