+1. Sex can be better or worse, depending on the people involved. Maybe a partner is more creative, more attuned, physically gifted or whatever. But, at a certain point, those advantages are going to be fighting what might easily be a losing battle against hormones and familiarity. So, I don't think it's a sound inference to conclude that the couples not having sex are just bad at it. |
what exactly is my cake? we both have loving spouses who like us, a good financial partner, and a good parenting partner. you seem to think it's incumbent on only the woman in a partnership to "open their legs" (ignoring all of the hormonal and body change reasons why that might have become painful or unpleasant or both) in the name of "sex", but the guy in the relationship doesn't have to open their legs for something that they think might be painful or unpleasant to them in reciprocity? they have to "swing that way"? i hear that you seem to value sex on your terms above everything else. cool, you'll pay for that at the divorce settlement. |
Totally wrong |
Well, 90% wrong anyway. |
LOL! someone sounds bitter. Seems like she is not getting anything. |