Other feds just very depressed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump just announced his 10 pt plan on X (Trump war room) He plans to move 100k fed jobs out of DC area as soon as he takes office. Said it would happen immediately.

lol, immediately?

That’s what trump said. Remains to be seen how quick he will do it. Would not underestimate him. They have had 4 yrs to plan this.

[Anonymous]

Not really, things will work out just fine.
We've done it before, we got this!
A job is just a job, nothing is ever guaranteed.
(if one door closes, another opens)

[Anonymous]

Came across this thread today. Also a federal employee who is anxious about the future. Just want to say that it is helpful to hear what others are candidly thinking/feeling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Save money, dust off resume.

What agencies are safe outside of ICE? May apply to one of their vacancies but don’t have a top secret clearance. Maybe one can be obtained if I receive a tentative offer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Save money, dust off resume.

What agencies are safe outside of ICE? May apply to one of their vacancies but don’t have a top secret clearance. Maybe one can be obtained if I receive a tentative offer.

Bureau of labor statistics, federal reserve banks, commerce, FAA, etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Save money, dust off resume.

What agencies are safe outside of ICE? May apply to one of their vacancies but don’t have a top secret clearance. Maybe one can be obtained if I receive a tentative offer.

Bureau of labor statistics, federal reserve banks, commerce, FAA, etc

MAGA hates the Fed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they’re going to do a lot, honestly. Elon musk is just a blowhard. If they had a real plan for huge cuts without chaos that would amount to political suicide, they would have done it. It’s the same as “repeal and replace.”

No chaos when they replace Fed jobs with contractors.

They simply can't if they are going to show any budget cuts. Contractors charge at least double for the same tasks done in house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is necessary. The government has become too bloated, and has the perception of doing less despite the increased personnel. By culling federal government bloat and agencies, we can restore these functions back to the states.

I see from the inside that there is bloat and definitely wasted cost.

But, I 100% believe government also carries out core functions (safety nets, infrastructure, data collection) that the average American doesn't understand at all, doesn't think they benefit from, and will sorely miss when gone. The state cannot and will not properly do these functions.

Also, every private agency/company I've ever worked at has had more/similar bloat. Part of society is to give people jobs. If everything is about efficiency and function we'll be down to people that provide healthcare (not the layers of admin above them), grow food, teach kids to read/math, and make shelter/clothes. The rest of what the rest of us do is pretty make work anyway. (Think your average lawyer.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they’re going to do a lot, honestly. Elon musk is just a blowhard. If they had a real plan for huge cuts without chaos that would amount to political suicide, they would have done it. It’s the same as “repeal and replace.”

No chaos when they replace Fed jobs with contractors.

They simply can't if they are going to show any budget cuts. Contractors charge at least double for the same tasks done in house.

No plans for contractors. These are just outright cuts and trimming the fat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they’re going to do a lot, honestly. Elon musk is just a blowhard. If they had a real plan for huge cuts without chaos that would amount to political suicide, they would have done it. It’s the same as “repeal and replace.”

No chaos when they replace Fed jobs with contractors.

They simply can't if they are going to show any budget cuts. Contractors charge at least double for the same tasks done in house.

No plans for contractors. These are just outright cuts and trimming the fat.

So they think. But they'll accidentally create a bunch of new fat and large unemployment numbers too. I don't trust they'd trim the fat and improve the economy enough for everyone to benefit. They haven't shown us they have anything but a concept of a plan, which they'll try to implement while it's still a concept, and it will be a mess.

[Anonymous]

I have 19 years at the DOJ and carry the family health insurance. We plan to switch it to my husband as he is at an agency not being targeted. My rational mind says not to worry but I am and I do. I believe in public service, I even agree with some things he wants and plans to do but it is still nerve wracking. I dedicated the better part of my career to lublic service and took pay cuts for stability. Spare me the private sector layoff guilt. I grew up with it. I just want to do my job and to continue to serve. I guess we need a budget too so who knows what will happen.

[Anonymous]

I'm a fed with 30+ years in and I hit my minimum age to retire in April but I won't have been on the fed health insurance for 5 years. I was planning to stay until I hit 62. In my case, I'm at an agency that is about as apolitical as you can get plus we don't recieve an appropriation. Most of our people are 100% remote so that might be targeted but it is subject to several union agreements so I don't think there is much that can be done and they have way bigger fish to fry.

That said, under R administrations they do stuff on the margins that is irritating and the overall feel from the top is that we are peons and if we had any real talent, we wouldn't be working here. Day to day stuff doesn't change much, fortunately.

I feel for all of my fellow feds who are at targeted agencies. I have friends across all agencies and the ones in the targeted ones are running for the doors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have 19 years at the DOJ and carry the family health insurance. We plan to switch it to my husband as he is at an agency not being targeted. My rational mind says not to worry but I am and I do. I believe in public service, I even agree with some things he wants and plans to do but it is still nerve wracking. I dedicated the better part of my career to lublic service and took pay cuts for stability. Spare me the private sector layoff guilt. I grew up with it. I just want to do my job and to continue to serve. I guess we need a budget too so who knows what will happen.

Why would you switch your insurance now? If you are fired or otherwise leave your job, you can switch it then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have 19 years at the DOJ and carry the family health insurance. We plan to switch it to my husband as he is at an agency not being targeted. My rational mind says not to worry but I am and I do. I believe in public service, I even agree with some things he wants and plans to do but it is still nerve wracking. I dedicated the better part of my career to lublic service and took pay cuts for stability. Spare me the private sector layoff guilt. I grew up with it. I just want to do my job and to continue to serve. I guess we need a budget too so who knows what will happen.

Why would you switch your insurance now? If you are fired or otherwise leave your job, you can switch it then.

Congratulations on not understanding how FEHB works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How long do you think it will take for the cuts to start happening?

I love my job, work very hard, and always thought I would stay at my agency until retirement. I now face the prospect of losing my job in my late 50s... I can't afford to retire and know how hard it is to find a new job at my age.

It feels bleak.

It depends on the agency. Military, defense, and veterans will increase.

What makes you think your agency will have cuts?

NP. It isn't just about cuts. It's where the cuts will be (ie, WHO is getting cut - the higher level people with the knowledge and experience. Bad for the government, and bad for those employees who are approaching retirement and could lose it all).
It's about Trump and his sycophants wanting to eliminate anyone who essentially believes in their oath of allegiance to the constitution and the country rather than taking an oath to the person in the oval office. That can happen at any/all agencies.
It's also about the Feds' retirement system (TSP) that Trump was eyeing his first time around to raid in order to bolster Social Security.

Not sure where you're getting information that Trump would raid TSPs to bolster Social Security. That makes no sense - they are basically 401ks that federal employees/retirees have funded and own. That's like saying "Trump will steal all of Democrats' savings to reduce the national debt."

people just make stupid comments man.