Tower 22 drone attack

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So far out of every 🇺🇸 service member who has died since Oct, not one was Jewish

Very interesting

Goyim are expendable it seems

When Iran decides to send a nuke our way you can say "Blame the Jews!" Right? Right?

Exactly. Who knew that the DEI crowd would rip its mask off like some tripped out Scooby-Doo episode, and we find out the reason they want us all to "see color" is because it's the *only* thing they see. (Even if it's not really there, eg, the claims that Israelis are not descended from the peoples of the Levant.)

I don’t support dei - what makes you say that?

Of course, you guys change the name once one falls out of favor. BLM, woke, DEI. Now "the Jews are the problem"-- that one will fail too.

Objectively, the pro-hamas in the US and Charlottesville protests seem remarkably similar.

So Charlottesville people are also pro blm/woke/dei?

[Anonymous]

I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

We will bomb some depots and someone will claim we killed children studying for school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

Nothing that will actually deter Iran.
This administration doesn't understand the concept of deterrence and what it takes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

We'll say that we are bombing terrorists camps. We'll blow up a bunch of buildings and release some bomb footage for news stations to air. Nothing will change and nobody will be deterred. Three dead Americans should mean dead Iranians, but it won't

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

We'll say that we are bombing terrorists camps. We'll blow up a bunch of buildings and release some bomb footage for news stations to air. Nothing will change and nobody will be deterred. Three dead Americans should mean dead Iranians, but it won't

Iranians have been killed though. Strikes in Damascus have killed many Iranians. Strikes by Israel in a third country (Syria) that kill Iranians are considered fine because they are seen as helping Hamas.

However strikes against Americans stationed in another country (Jordan) are deemed as not ok even though we are directly helping Israel in their war.

I disagree with that notion. If we help another country engage in warfare then our troops become legitimate targets by allies of the party we are helping to fight against.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

We'll say that we are bombing terrorists camps. We'll blow up a bunch of buildings and release some bomb footage for news stations to air. Nothing will change and nobody will be deterred. Three dead Americans should mean dead Iranians, but it won't

Iranians have been killed though. Strikes in Damascus have killed many Iranians. Strikes by Israel in a third country (Syria) that kill Iranians are considered fine because they are seen as helping Hamas.

However strikes against Americans stationed in another country (Jordan) are deemed as not ok even though we are directly helping Israel in their war.

I disagree with that notion. If we help another country engage in warfare then our troops become legitimate targets by allies of the party we are helping to fight against.

So, you are giving the green light to Russia to attack US troops?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

We'll say that we are bombing terrorists camps. We'll blow up a bunch of buildings and release some bomb footage for news stations to air. Nothing will change and nobody will be deterred. Three dead Americans should mean dead Iranians, but it won't

Iranians have been killed though. Strikes in Damascus have killed many Iranians. Strikes by Israel in a third country (Syria) that kill Iranians are considered fine because they are seen as helping Hamas.

However strikes against Americans stationed in another country (Jordan) are deemed as not ok even though we are directly helping Israel in their war.

I disagree with that notion. If we help another country engage in warfare then our troops become legitimate targets by allies of the party we are helping to fight against.

Empires don't ever view their citizens as legitimate targets. Strong leaders make sure other countries know they are off limits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

We'll say that we are bombing terrorists camps. We'll blow up a bunch of buildings and release some bomb footage for news stations to air. Nothing will change and nobody will be deterred. Three dead Americans should mean dead Iranians, but it won't

Iranians have been killed though. Strikes in Damascus have killed many Iranians. Strikes by Israel in a third country (Syria) that kill Iranians are considered fine because they are seen as helping Hamas.

However strikes against Americans stationed in another country (Jordan) are deemed as not ok even though we are directly helping Israel in their war.

I disagree with that notion. If we help another country engage in warfare then our troops become legitimate targets by allies of the party we are helping to fight against.

Empires don't ever view their citizens as legitimate targets. Strong leaders make sure other countries know they are off limits.

Unfortunately, we don't have a strong leader at this time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is BLM silent about three black lives?

It’s not silent. It is just not on FOX…so you do not see it. Many Americans are questioning why blacks are good enough to die in the desert for Israel but are removed by force as the president of Harvard. I know you want to go back to the Jim Crow laws but the vast majority of Americans are not with you.

I watch CNN and MSNBC primarily and none of them report mass protests for these three black men killed, did i miss something? Also, weird comparison: since when Harvard president was denied to serve in US forces?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing the time and place of our choosing will likely be tomorrow night (Tehran time zone.)

What do you think will happen?

We'll say that we are bombing terrorists camps. We'll blow up a bunch of buildings and release some bomb footage for news stations to air. Nothing will change and nobody will be deterred. Three dead Americans should mean dead Iranians, but it won't

Iranians have been killed though. Strikes in Damascus have killed many Iranians. Strikes by Israel in a third country (Syria) that kill Iranians are considered fine because they are seen as helping Hamas.

However strikes against Americans stationed in another country (Jordan) are deemed as not ok even though we are directly helping Israel in their war.

I disagree with that notion. If we help another country engage in warfare then our troops become legitimate targets by allies of the party we are helping to fight against.

Empires don't ever view their citizens as legitimate targets. Strong leaders make sure other countries know they are off limits.

Unfortunately, we don't have a strong leader at this time.

We have no CIC currently. Our top military guy is more concerned about his ass and prostate than our safety.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is BLM silent about three black lives?

It’s not silent. It is just not on FOX…so you do not see it. Many Americans are questioning why blacks are good enough to die in the desert for Israel but are removed by force as the president of Harvard. I know you want to go back to the Jim Crow laws but the vast majority of Americans are not with you.

Please link to the mass protests like they had for George Floyd?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is BLM silent about three black lives?

It’s not silent. It is just not on FOX…so you do not see it. Many Americans are questioning why blacks are good enough to die in the desert for Israel but are removed by force as the president of Harvard. I know you want to go back to the Jim Crow laws but the vast majority of Americans are not with you.

I watch CNN and MSNBC primarily and none of them report mass protests for these three black men killed, did i miss something? Also, weird comparison: since when Harvard president was denied to serve in US forces?

It wasn’t 3 black men killed. One was a woman, JFC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is BLM silent about three black lives?

It’s not silent. It is just not on FOX…so you do not see it. Many Americans are questioning why blacks are good enough to die in the desert for Israel but are removed by force as the president of Harvard. I know you want to go back to the Jim Crow laws but the vast majority of Americans are not with you.

I watch CNN and MSNBC primarily and none of them report mass protests for these three black men killed, did i miss something? Also, weird comparison: since when Harvard president was denied to serve in US forces?

It wasn’t 3 black men killed. One was a woman, JFC.

Two were women.
Kennedy and Breonna.