
They will likely cancel the trip if no deal just before. |
You'll already be on the trip but will have to come home early. I HATE this so much. It's such a waste of time and energy even when it doesn't happen (like pausing work so it's not caught in limbo during a potential shutdown). During the last one (2013), I unpacked a kitchen after a move and it was useful to have that time off but still AWFUL for work and productivity with months of delays following. It feels like congress needs built in pentalties for law makers if budgets can't be passed. |
This is how my agency has handled it in the past. |
At my agency in the past, you would go on the trip but needed to end the trip and return home early on Oct 1 if the government shut down. These were trips that involved meeting with non-USG organizations. |
Our federal daycare closed and still charges since they accrued expenses and still paid staff. Parents received a small amount back from what went unspent due to the shutdown. DH was excepted so paying for a nanny plus daycare was rough in prior shutdown. |
This is shutdown related, but not job related. Will White House tours, Capitol tours, etc continue through September, and then stop 10/1 if there's a shutdown? Or will they stop earlier? |
+1. Different agency and been through too many shutdowns. I’ve been furloughed despite being essential because I was traveling on approved leave at the time the shutdown started. And, there was no expectation I would cut my trip short. I’ve have been furloughed because I had approved leave (vacation)— but, I had to prove I had pre-paid travel arrangements. And have been furloughed despite being essential for necessary medical care. Regular dentist visit needed to be rescheduled. Root canal or scheduled surgery, you can can take the leave. If you are going to get COVID, October 1 is the time. Previously, if you were essential and furloughed, there was a downside no guarantee you would be paid for that time. We always were. But you never were 100% sure. Whereas, you were guaranteed pay for time worked. Now, everyone gets back pay when it’s over, those who work and those furloughed. So, I’m wishing ai had been more on the ball and booked a week at an air BNB in the mountains starting October 1. |
They should not stop until the shutdown stops. It’s a very drop everything you are doing at the stroke of midnight situation. You get 4 hours for orderly shutdown. Which cannot be substantive work. It’s purely out of office replies on emails and phones. It takes 15 minutes, although we used to hang out and make gallows humor jokes for the 4 authorized hrs because we knew we’d at least get paid for that time. Now, we get paid anyway, so orderly shutdown is very short. Which is what makes near misses so annoying. Congress pats itself on the back for narrowly avoiding a shutdown. But, no one sees how much time gets wasted preparing for the near misses. Whether the shutdown happen or not, you have to get your workload into position to be abandoned for a day, or week or more than a month with the least damage possible. In my case, it’s who is literally going to die if we don’t get this signed and out with a date before 10/1, and who will just live without cancer treatment for a while. It’s stressful and demoralizing. And I’m not the once who isn’t able to access life saving medical care. |
This! And I’d still pay absurd gas and parking fees. F$$&ing hate these idiots on the hill. |
It is illegal for him to work. So doubt it. |
I’ve been told unofficially that my agency has funds to stay open for some amount of time. They haven’t said how long yet, but in the past it’s been about a week. We also got a lot of IRA and BIL money-and people who charge time to those accounts (like me) will be excepted. (Unclear what happens to people who charge part of their time.) This will be my first time working during a shutdown and I’m temporarily covering for my boss who is moving to a new job next week. Awesome timing for me! |
Former Senate employee. Congress doesn’t shutdown. This is an executive branch thing. Congress passes their funding, trust me. |
Yep, it would violate the Anti-Deficiency Act because your DH would be providing a service for the Government, thus the Government would incur an obligation to pay him (and it doesn't matter if your DH says he wants to work for free, that would be a "gift" which the Government likely couldn't accept). Violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act is a felony, should your DH's agency wish to pursue charges, and should DoJ agree to prosecute. At the very least, he will definitely be fired. |
Thank you for sharing. That is horrible. These stories should be in the press. |
Why doesn’t the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act (which became law in 2019) modify this to some extent? |