New Superintendent to be named on February 8th

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.

I’m the PP you are trying to make fun of. I get up at 5:30 AM on weekdays and 6:30 AM on weekends for me is sleeping in. This is normal for many adults with kids.

To the substance of your proposal, why should she get a 4 year trial period when she’s just had a trial period and has been found wanting? What sense does that make? In addition and this is important, when this county does not extend the contacts of supers it makes it harder to attract good candidates. When Starrs contract was not extended, it was extraordinarily hard to get recruit good candidates and I understand that Smith had to basically be begged to take it. So whoever is appointed should be considered permanent and you yourself admit that wouldn’t be a good idea based on her record so far.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:8 school districts in the state of Maryland alone are looking for new Superintendents.

My guess is MCPS will name McKnight for the job, and they can continue their downward slide. New blood is so needed, to clean house and fix the mess brought by the last few.


Why not let one of the other 8 have her? She’s bounced from other school systems before she was named Deputy Superintendent.

That’s my view as well. I see excuses frequently that things are not her fault because MCPS is so big. Maybe it’s just too big for her? Perhaps her supporters are right that she can be a good super but maybe only in the right environment. Nothing to be ashamed of for her to take on a smaller district and maybe even one a little closer to home would work better for her family.

It's the unrealistic expectation that a super has godlike powers. MCPS is a big ship and hard to turn.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.


Lol. Most parents don’t sleep in till 10am on a Sunday. Who says posting on this thread was the first thing that PP did? Even so, so what?

BTW - your four year argument to test Dr. McKnight out is the lamest thing I have ever read on DCUM. Four years is 1/3 of a child’s public school education. She was Deputy Superintendent and she was the Interim Superintendent. She has shown to be disconnected from the school system that she is leading. Violence is up. There was next to no planning for the surge of COVID following winter break. No confidence votes by two major unions in MCPS.

Nope. You don’t give her a four year contract. Dr. McKnight has already shown she does not have the skills for the job.


Firstly, I'm a parent as well. Moreover, knowing that there is a pronounced shortage of superintendent candidates nationwide, who else do you recommend, especially when it comes to dealing with very demanding DC area parents? Instead of throwing insults, please note that the four-year "argument" is established Maryland law, and I'd rather have consistency in a critical role. In terms of "violence" being up, correlation does not equal causation. Not every union member voted, it's only the most vocal ones that we end up hearing from.


What shortage? 12 people applied!


What’s your point? Thats not an overwhelming number. It also doesn’t soeak to yhe qualification or desirability of any of the candidates.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:8 school districts in the state of Maryland alone are looking for new Superintendents.

My guess is MCPS will name McKnight for the job, and they can continue their downward slide. New blood is so needed, to clean house and fix the mess brought by the last few.


Why not let one of the other 8 have her? She’s bounced from other school systems before she was named Deputy Superintendent.

That’s my view as well. I see excuses frequently that things are not her fault because MCPS is so big. Maybe it’s just too big for her? Perhaps her supporters are right that she can be a good super but maybe only in the right environment. Nothing to be ashamed of for her to take on a smaller district and maybe even one a little closer to home would work better for her family.

It's the unrealistic expectation that a super has godlike powers. MCPS is a big ship and hard to turn.


This! Plus the unrealistic expectation that DCUM would be happy with anyone. Not Weast, not Starr, not Smith, not McKnight. Which is why we elect a board instead of making crucial decisions based off DCUM fickleness.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:8 school districts in the state of Maryland alone are looking for new Superintendents.

My guess is MCPS will name McKnight for the job, and they can continue their downward slide. New blood is so needed, to clean house and fix the mess brought by the last few.


Why not let one of the other 8 have her? She’s bounced from other school systems before she was named Deputy Superintendent.

That’s my view as well. I see excuses frequently that things are not her fault because MCPS is so big. Maybe it’s just too big for her? Perhaps her supporters are right that she can be a good super but maybe only in the right environment. Nothing to be ashamed of for her to take on a smaller district and maybe even one a little closer to home would work better for her family.

It's the unrealistic expectation that a super has godlike powers. MCPS is a big ship and hard to turn.


This! Plus the unrealistic expectation that DCUM would be happy with anyone. Not Weast, not Starr, not Smith, not McKnight. Which is why we elect a board instead of making crucial decisions based off DCUM fickleness.


Unrealistic? More like educated and savvy populace that’s unhappy with half of MCPS third graders reading below grade level. These duds did real damage…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:8 school districts in the state of Maryland alone are looking for new Superintendents.

My guess is MCPS will name McKnight for the job, and they can continue their downward slide. New blood is so needed, to clean house and fix the mess brought by the last few.


Why not let one of the other 8 have her? She’s bounced from other school systems before she was named Deputy Superintendent.

That’s my view as well. I see excuses frequently that things are not her fault because MCPS is so big. Maybe it’s just too big for her? Perhaps her supporters are right that she can be a good super but maybe only in the right environment. Nothing to be ashamed of for her to take on a smaller district and maybe even one a little closer to home would work better for her family.

It's the unrealistic expectation that a super has godlike powers. MCPS is a big ship and hard to turn.


This! Plus the unrealistic expectation that DCUM would be happy with anyone. Not Weast, not Starr, not Smith, not McKnight. Which is why we elect a board instead of making crucial decisions based off DCUM fickleness.


Unrealistic? More like educated and savvy populace that’s unhappy with half of MCPS third graders reading below grade level. These duds did real damage…

How did the duds of MCPS do real damage? I ask you, barring some type of learning disability, what do you think tge home life of those third graders reading below grade level is like? Do you think they have parents reading to them every night? Do you think their parents are talking to them in a way that teaches them? Do you think tge parents sang the alphabet song to them as little kids? Do you think the parents worked on letters and the sounds they made?

You can’t squeeze blood out of a rock.

Learning begins at home. If parents don’t start the foundations at home, the teacher’s job is going to be so much harder. Those kids probably need a much more intensive academic experience compared to the kids of parents who taught their kids at home. Should we group all kids together who need that extensive support? Would you be okay if MCPS did such a grouping and it mainly consisted of blacks and Hispanics?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.

I’m the PP you are trying to make fun of. I get up at 5:30 AM on weekdays and 6:30 AM on weekends for me is sleeping in. This is normal for many adults with kids.

To the substance of your proposal, why should she get a 4 year trial period when she’s just had a trial period and has been found wanting? What sense does that make? In addition and this is important, when this county does not extend the contacts of supers it makes it harder to attract good candidates. When Starrs contract was not extended, it was extraordinarily hard to get recruit good candidates and I understand that Smith had to basically be begged to take it. So whoever is appointed should be considered permanent and you yourself admit that wouldn’t be a good idea based on her record so far.


She's done such an amazing job. I just don't get why there are so many downers. She's awesome!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.


Oooh facts! I like facts! Here's a copy from earlier in this thread.


Sure, let's talk about "actual facts" about McKnight and the board's record.

If we want to discuss leadership and policy planning, let's talk about the disaster this January. Instead of preparing a covid response, McKnight spent her time making videos to tell everyone what her favorite subject in school or cafeteria lunch was (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbZjpank-s0, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_yWDfS2p9g). Because of bad planning, MCPS had to change their color code dashboard policy in the same week. There were only, what, 15 days of actual instructional days in January (due to weather, holidays, etc.). In just 15 days, 2100 teachers and staff were out sick, 9% of the entire student body with covid. Heck, even her own Central Office had so many people out they couldn't even get out the covid stats out on time? MCPS leadership had to even go begging for National Guard to drive kids to school, and got humiliated when they were told it's a school issue to solve. Then they shut down 31 schools that now that may need to make up the instructional time this summer? The 31 schools weren't always the ones that affected the students the worst by covid?

If we want to discuss McKnight and the boards support of parents and their children's health and safety, remember they were both tone deaf to parents. (https://www.change.org/p/mcps-board-of-education-w...ed-virtual-learning-right-now, https://www.change.org/p/in-person-learning-is-the...ls-open-for-in-person-learning)

If we want to discuss ability to lead staff and teachers, she has had two no-confidence votes against her. MCEA doesn't need every single member to vote when it's a 94% landslide, and an emergency council session needs to be called. (https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools...on-on-mcps-covid-19-response/, https://www.fox5dc.com/news/montgomery-co-public-s...ncil-holding-emergency-session)

If we want to discuss whether McKnight and the board shouldn't be blamed for these fiascos, McKnight and the board can't say they didn't know (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTrT2NKc2NQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaLpALVHrc). On Aug 24, 2021, MCPS released a video where McKnight led with "let me be clear - health and safety is our first priority, always has been, and will continue to be." (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzftOw9Vgqo). In the same video (at time 4:25) McKnight admitted that students were able to thrive in a virtual environment, which is the virtual academy opened for 3,000 students. Just as McKnight spoke about the delta variant, the video was cut off.

If we want to discuss her strongest focus issue, discrimination, this stellar track record doesn't even include the massive number of open investigations by the Department of Education OCR. MCPS was a top-20 ranker in open discrimination cases. McKnight and the board didn't need to conduct any survey - all they needed to do was to look in the inbox.

If we want to discuss student safety, showing up an hour late to the school shooting press conference dressed in pink while their children are held inside the school probably didn't send a caring message to parents. https://original.newsbreak.com/@heather-jauquet-56...leased-at-magruder-high-school Remember this is the same person who said "let me be clear - health and safety is our first priority, always has been , and will continue to be"

If we want to discuss financial management, $1.6M of covid funding spent on Kids Museum? The board even filled a position, with out a vote, with a person who's spouse is associated with Kids Museum? $160M on electric buses approved by the board (and it's not clear whether the electrical grid can handle it)? Two upper management in transportation suddenly removed? The optics of this doesn't look good from an ethics perspective.

All of this was even before McKnight was confirmed as the superintendent. But if you still want to claim McKnight and the board are blameless and keep them in charge of your taxpayer dollars and children's health and safety - I'm sure that they'll do even worse things in the future that will shock even the most ardent supporter.


Now, where are yours?


Yes. So awesome. Yea.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.

I’m the PP you are trying to make fun of. I get up at 5:30 AM on weekdays and 6:30 AM on weekends for me is sleeping in. This is normal for many adults with kids.

To the substance of your proposal, why should she get a 4 year trial period when she’s just had a trial period and has been found wanting? What sense does that make? In addition and this is important, when this county does not extend the contacts of supers it makes it harder to attract good candidates. When Starrs contract was not extended, it was extraordinarily hard to get recruit good candidates and I understand that Smith had to basically be begged to take it. So whoever is appointed should be considered permanent and you yourself admit that wouldn’t be a good idea based on her record so far.


She's done such an amazing job. I just don't get why there are so many downers. She's awesome!

You forgot the sarcasm tags!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:8 school districts in the state of Maryland alone are looking for new Superintendents.

My guess is MCPS will name McKnight for the job, and they can continue their downward slide. New blood is so needed, to clean house and fix the mess brought by the last few.


Why not let one of the other 8 have her? She’s bounced from other school systems before she was named Deputy Superintendent.

That’s my view as well. I see excuses frequently that things are not her fault because MCPS is so big. Maybe it’s just too big for her? Perhaps her supporters are right that she can be a good super but maybe only in the right environment. Nothing to be ashamed of for her to take on a smaller district and maybe even one a little closer to home would work better for her family.

It's the unrealistic expectation that a super has godlike powers. MCPS is a big ship and hard to turn.


This! Plus the unrealistic expectation that DCUM would be happy with anyone. Not Weast, not Starr, not Smith, not McKnight. Which is why we elect a board instead of making crucial decisions based off DCUM fickleness.


Unrealistic? More like educated and savvy populace that’s unhappy with half of MCPS third graders reading below grade level. These duds did real damage…

How did the duds of MCPS do real damage? I ask you, barring some type of learning disability, what do you think tge home life of those third graders reading below grade level is like? Do you think they have parents reading to them every night? Do you think their parents are talking to them in a way that teaches them? Do you think tge parents sang the alphabet song to them as little kids? Do you think the parents worked on letters and the sounds they made?

You can’t squeeze blood out of a rock.

Learning begins at home. If parents don’t start the foundations at home, the teacher’s job is going to be so much harder. Those kids probably need a much more intensive academic experience compared to the kids of parents who taught their kids at home. Should we group all kids together who need that extensive support? Would you be okay if MCPS did such a grouping and it mainly consisted of blacks and Hispanics?



Thank you for the opportunity to answer this important question. A school system I think has three responsibilities- a solid curriculum, science backed reading instruction and safe. Curriculum 2.0. (Weast, Starr, Smith) No phonics. (Weast, Starr, Smith) 53 sexual predators in 17 years (Weast, Starr, Smith). I could go on but this is basic blocking and tackling that MCPS leadership has failed to achieve for 20 years. Q.E.D.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.

I’m the PP you are trying to make fun of. I get up at 5:30 AM on weekdays and 6:30 AM on weekends for me is sleeping in. This is normal for many adults with kids.

To the substance of your proposal, why should she get a 4 year trial period when she’s just had a trial period and has been found wanting? What sense does that make? In addition and this is important, when this county does not extend the contacts of supers it makes it harder to attract good candidates. When Starrs contract was not extended, it was extraordinarily hard to get recruit good candidates and I understand that Smith had to basically be begged to take it. So whoever is appointed should be considered permanent and you yourself admit that wouldn’t be a good idea based on her record so far.


Smith had to be begged?????? Where you getting your kool-aid from? What a load of crap.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:8 school districts in the state of Maryland alone are looking for new Superintendents.

My guess is MCPS will name McKnight for the job, and they can continue their downward slide. New blood is so needed, to clean house and fix the mess brought by the last few.


Why not let one of the other 8 have her? She’s bounced from other school systems before she was named Deputy Superintendent.

That’s my view as well. I see excuses frequently that things are not her fault because MCPS is so big. Maybe it’s just too big for her? Perhaps her supporters are right that she can be a good super but maybe only in the right environment. Nothing to be ashamed of for her to take on a smaller district and maybe even one a little closer to home would work better for her family.

It's the unrealistic expectation that a super has godlike powers. MCPS is a big ship and hard to turn.


This! Plus the unrealistic expectation that DCUM would be happy with anyone. Not Weast, not Starr, not Smith, not McKnight. Which is why we elect a board instead of making crucial decisions based off DCUM fickleness.


Unrealistic? More like educated and savvy populace that’s unhappy with half of MCPS third graders reading below grade level. These duds did real damage…

How did the duds of MCPS do real damage? I ask you, barring some type of learning disability, what do you think tge home life of those third graders reading below grade level is like? Do you think they have parents reading to them every night? Do you think their parents are talking to them in a way that teaches them? Do you think tge parents sang the alphabet song to them as little kids? Do you think the parents worked on letters and the sounds they made?

You can’t squeeze blood out of a rock.

Learning begins at home. If parents don’t start the foundations at home, the teacher’s job is going to be so much harder. Those kids probably need a much more intensive academic experience compared to the kids of parents who taught their kids at home. Should we group all kids together who need that extensive support? Would you be okay if MCPS did such a grouping and it mainly consisted of blacks and Hispanics?



Holy freaking moly.

So you are blaming the inability of students to make grade level benchmarks on their race, ethnicity, and home life as opposed to a broken school system that is responsible for of all things, educating students?

MCPS needs to put its big boy/girl pants on and recognize that yes, if 3rd graders are not reading at 3rd grade level then they need to fix it. Perhaps pay attention to a the little benchmarks a child started missing along the way. Perhaps don’t wait to evaluate a child for disabilities when there are a billion red flags signaling that there’s a problem. Perhaps don’t be so sure to judge that you know what goes on in the homes of others and have implicit biases as to the educational outcome of students.

The top priority of MCPS is to teach. Dr. McKnight is not a newbie and she has demonstrated as Deputy Superintendent and Interim Superintendent she is not up to the task. If the Board of Ed won’t listen to parents, listen to the no confidence vote by the unions.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.

I’m the PP you are trying to make fun of. I get up at 5:30 AM on weekdays and 6:30 AM on weekends for me is sleeping in. This is normal for many adults with kids.

To the substance of your proposal, why should she get a 4 year trial period when she’s just had a trial period and has been found wanting? What sense does that make? In addition and this is important, when this county does not extend the contacts of supers it makes it harder to attract good candidates. When Starrs contract was not extended, it was extraordinarily hard to get recruit good candidates and I understand that Smith had to basically be begged to take it. So whoever is appointed should be considered permanent and you yourself admit that wouldn’t be a good idea based on her record so far.


A lot to decipher here. Wasn't trying to make fun of you, it's just an awkward time to hop on DCUM is all.

I never said that the 4 years was a "trial period" by any means. The point I wanted to assert is that Superintendent contracts can be cancelled or non-renewed at any time. It will take multiple years for someone to fully grasp the dynamics of such a huge, diverse school district, not to mention the politics that come with it. Let's be real: as much as it should be about kids, it's equally about the relationships with internal and external partners as well and the appearance of looking in control, not the substance/follow through (which she has shown).

Smith didn't have to be "begged". The original candidate, Andrew Houlihan, declined the offer when he was Houston's Chief Academic Officer because the Board was fractured at that time. He had thrown his name in there just for the sake of it and didn't actually expect to get it, just to angle for bigger districts in the future because, hey, he was a "finalist" for MCPS. Hence why he withdrew his candidacy the next day. How does all of that lead to me saying it's not a good idea to hire her based on record? I think it's better than people give her credit for. Sure, some things could've been handled differently on her part, but you can't please everyone and she's a quick study. Show me someone who is mastering the unpredictable COVID environment right now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I. know she's done an amazing job in light of the mess she was handed. She's got my vote!


Wait. Wasn't she the Deputy Sup before? it's a nice spin though - try to make it look like it wasn't her issue.

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/superintendent/bio.aspx

This WAS her own mess to clean up. Plus, all the really bad stuff happened on HER watch, so she can't blame anyone else.

Let’s be clear.

McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was deputy.
McKnight is not responsible for anything that happened while she was interim.
McKnight will not be responsible for anything that will happen when she is the superintendent.


You woke up at 7:56am on a Sunday to reply? This was the first thing on your mind when you woke up?? Crazy idea: give her the contract. In Maryland, Supers can only serve 4 year terms -- they can't get extensions for 1 year, 2 years, etc. If she isn't showing progressing leadership qualities by the end of the term, and results aren't improving (though it takes more time and requires the same people building on their predecessor as the average superintendent serves 3 years), then don't renew. God, why does DCUM have to be so crazy, unreasonable, and uptight? Sometimes I feel like there are 5 year olds on these threads, not middle age folks.


Lol. Most parents don’t sleep in till 10am on a Sunday. Who says posting on this thread was the first thing that PP did? Even so, so what?

BTW - your four year argument to test Dr. McKnight out is the lamest thing I have ever read on DCUM. Four years is 1/3 of a child’s public school education. She was Deputy Superintendent and she was the Interim Superintendent. She has shown to be disconnected from the school system that she is leading. Violence is up. There was next to no planning for the surge of COVID following winter break. No confidence votes by two major unions in MCPS.

Nope. You don’t give her a four year contract. Dr. McKnight has already shown she does not have the skills for the job.


Firstly, I'm a parent as well. Moreover, knowing that there is a pronounced shortage of superintendent candidates nationwide, who else do you recommend, especially when it comes to dealing with very demanding DC area parents? Instead of throwing insults, please note that the four-year "argument" is established Maryland law, and I'd rather have consistency in a critical role. In terms of "violence" being up, correlation does not equal causation. Not every union member voted, it's only the most vocal ones that we end up hearing from.


What shortage? 12 people applied!


And other similar sized districts have had 5 dozen apply for their search. Just because someone applies doesn't mean that they automatically have the mustard to hold their own. For a district like MCPS, 12 is quite low.
Anonymous
I never said that the 4 years was a "trial period" by any means. The point I wanted to assert is that Superintendent contracts can be cancelled or non-renewed at any time. It will take multiple years for someone to fully grasp the dynamics of such a huge, diverse school district, not to mention the politics that come with it. Let's be real: as much as it should be about kids, it's equally about the relationships with internal and external partners as well and the appearance of looking in control, not the substance/follow through (which she has shown).


Really? I think you need glasses.

"Frantic parents watched in disbelief, waiting for their children to be released at Magruder High School" "As parents continued to wait, students were held inside for more than two hours after the suspect was apprehended while the Interim Superintendent made her way to the school. Parents have asked why it took the Interim Superintendent more than four hours to arrive on the scene. In addition, many parents watched in frustration as the press conference started and their children were still in the building. One parent asked, “Why are they congratulating themselves on a job well done before we even get to see our kids?” Students were released after 5:45pm more than four hours after lockdown began and more than two hours after a student was apprehended."
https://original.newsbreak.com/@heather-jauquet-561408/2505040189085-frantic-parents-watched-in-disbelief-waiting-for-their-children-to-be-released-at-magruder-high-school

"Montgomery Co. Public Schools teacher’s union votes no confidence; council holding emergency session" "out of nearly 7,000 members voting in a day, around 94% voted "no confidence" in both the Montgomery County School Board and Interim Superintendent Dr. Monifa McKnight." "the Montgomery County’s Education and Culture Committee is now planning an emergency session with MCPS next Thursday to discuss details not shared in the Wednesday night meeting." https://www.fox5dc.com/news/montgomery-co-public-schools-teachers-union-votes-no-confidence-council-holding-emergency-session
Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Go to: