New Superintendent to be named on February 8th

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true that her kids are in PG private schools? A condition of employment should be that she must live in the county. She should then enroll her own kids in public.

I thought there were at St Anselm's

With Jawando's kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true that her kids are in PG private schools? A condition of employment should be that she must live in the county. She should then enroll her own kids in public.

I thought there were at St Anselm's

With Jawando's kids?

I thought she had 1 kid.

[Anonymous]

MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true that her kids are in PG private schools? A condition of employment should be that she must live in the county. She should then enroll her own kids in public.

I thought there were at St Anselm's

With Jawando's kids?

His kids are at an MoCo private school. Its posted on his social media. I don't think its appropriate to post about people's kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

The Board of Ed should require that you have a child in MCPS to sit on the board. Many of them don't have young kids or kids in MCPS so they don't know or care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

The Board of Ed should require that you have a child in MCPS to sit on the board. Many of them don't have young kids or kids in MCPS so they don't know or care.

Not having a kid in school is not a prerequisite for caring about kids or society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

The Board of Ed should require that you have a child in MCPS to sit on the board. Many of them don't have young kids or kids in MCPS so they don't know or care.

Not having a kid in school is not a prerequisite for caring about kids or society.

Yes, but when you don’t, it makes it easier to hide from your constituents! This is a sham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

The Board of Ed should require that you have a child in MCPS to sit on the board. Many of them don't have young kids or kids in MCPS so they don't know or care.

Not having a kid in school is not a prerequisite for caring about kids or society.

Yes, but when you don’t, it makes it easier to hide from your constituents! This is a sham

I personally think that the Board is derelict of its oversight responsibility because they are part-time positions, many of whom do not have an educational background other than their service on the Board, and they are advised by the same General Counsel that advises MCPS. Often, they do not take time to objectively review issues or ask MCPS important questions. The Board members just rubber stamp whatever the Superintendent asks for and they wasted tax dollars on a Superintendent search that they created a predestined outcome for.

If you now look at the experience of many of the top leaders in Central Office, MCPS hired people that left some of the worst school districts in Maryland. Is it any wonder the quality of educating students has slipped?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

The Board of Ed should require that you have a child in MCPS to sit on the board. Many of them don't have young kids or kids in MCPS so they don't know or care.

It's hard enough to get anyone to run for a BOE seat these days. You want to drastically reduce the number of eligible people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If you now look at the experience of many of the top leaders in Central Office, MCPS hired people that left some of the worst school districts in Maryland. Is it any wonder the quality of educating students has slipped?

Which people/school districts do you mean? An earlier post showed most of the top leaders in Central Office are former MCPS principals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

Disagree my kids are getting a vastly better education than I got at a W 25 years ago. You people just like to complain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If you now look at the experience of many of the top leaders in Central Office, MCPS hired people that left some of the worst school districts in Maryland. Is it any wonder the quality of educating students has slipped?

Which people/school districts do you mean? An earlier post showed most of the top leaders in Central Office are former MCPS principals.

They make these things up to support their fictional narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

The Board of Ed should require that you have a child in MCPS to sit on the board. Many of them don't have young kids or kids in MCPS so they don't know or care.

Not having a kid in school is not a prerequisite for caring about kids or society.

Yes, but when you don’t, it makes it easier to hide from your constituents! This is a sham

I personally think that the Board is derelict of its oversight responsibility because they are part-time positions, many of whom do not have an educational background other than their service on the Board, and they are advised by the same General Counsel that advises MCPS. Often, they do not take time to objectively review issues or ask MCPS important questions. The Board members just rubber stamp whatever the Superintendent asks for and they wasted tax dollars on a Superintendent search that they created a predestined outcome for.

If you now look at the experience of many of the top leaders in Central Office, MCPS hired people that left some of the worst school districts in Maryland. Is it any wonder the quality of educating students has slipped?

Well, you're part of a small minority who believes this. The majority of us will vote them back in by a landslide just like every election because we're happy with the job they're doing.

[Anonymous]

Congratulations to Dr. McKnight! This is really great news!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MCPS has slid from bad to worse. Central Office is completely disconnected from what is going on in schools. The Board of Ed let teachers, principals, parents and students down.

The Board of Ed should require that you have a child in MCPS to sit on the board. Many of them don't have young kids or kids in MCPS so they don't know or care.

Not having a kid in school is not a prerequisite for caring about kids or society.

Yes, but when you don’t, it makes it easier to hide from your constituents! This is a sham

I personally think that the Board is derelict of its oversight responsibility because they are part-time positions, many of whom do not have an educational background other than their service on the Board, and they are advised by the same General Counsel that advises MCPS. Often, they do not take time to objectively review issues or ask MCPS important questions. The Board members just rubber stamp whatever the Superintendent asks for and they wasted tax dollars on a Superintendent search that they created a predestined outcome for.

If you now look at the experience of many of the top leaders in Central Office, MCPS hired people that left some of the worst school districts in Maryland. Is it any wonder the quality of educating students has slipped?

Well, you're part of a small minority who believes this. The majority of us will vote them back in by a landslide just like every election because we're happy with the job they're doing.

Let’s see if they get the Apple Ballot endorsement they received in the past.