Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Is it permitted to say that I think Ford is lying though her teeth? Not confused, not traumatized, not mixed up, just stone-cold lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Wow, this is hysterical. Done in by his own documents.

Brett kavanaugh, aka Bart o'kavanaugh And his prolific poker is fffffinished. Not my words, but his.

Nope.
You folks have “screwed the pooch;” “overshot your wad;” “cried wolf one too many times.” Choose your idiom.

After all the false allegations of sexual assault and gang rape, then the allegations of being an alcoholic or someone with anger control issues, and the worst of all - he threw ice at someone in a bar - All the research you liberals and the media have done to find SOMETHING - ANYTHING to derail this nomination, we JUST AREN’T BUYING IT. The media are actively trying to track down something incriminating. I somehow think this was one of the reasons the Democrats were looking for a delay.
You are now trying to take a letter written by this man over 30 years ago, indicating he had a good sense of humor, was self-deprecating, and quite the planner and organizer, and making something of it because you will do “whatever it takes.”

Nope. Not buying it.

(PS Another allegation was sent to Chris Coons. Look for it. Then, look at Senator Grassley’s letter to Coons. This has become utterly ridiculous)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PredictIt is now saying that there’s only a 27% chance that Kav is not confirmed.

That's about right. He has about 80% chance of getting confirmed assuming each undecided senator is 50/50 for voting yes.

PredicitIt picked Hillary to be president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it permitted to say that I think Ford is lying though her teeth? Not confused, not traumatized, not mixed up, just stone-cold lying.

Even President Trump doesn’t agree with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it permitted to say that I think Ford is lying though her teeth? Not confused, not traumatized, not mixed up, just stone-cold lying.

Absolutely it is permitted. On an anonymous board. In public? Probably not. You might be attacked by activist liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say. Or, really, as DaNang Blumenthal said.

Actually. It’s what Black’s Law Dictionary says.

False in one thing, false in everything. Where a party is clearly shown to have embezzled one article of property, it is a ground of presumption that he may have embezzled others also. The Boston, 1 Sumn. 328, 356, Fed. Cas. No. 1,673; The Santissima Trinidad, 7 Wheat. 339, 5 L. Ed. 454. This maxim is particularly applied to the testimony of a witness, who, if he is shown to have sworn falsely in one detail, may be considered unworthy of belief as to all the rest of his evidence. Grimes v. State, 63 Ala. 168; Wilson v. Coulter, 29 App. Div. 85, 51 N. Y. Supp. 804; White v. Dlsher, 67 Cal. 402, 7 Pac. 826.

However it might be used as a precedent in law, it is an Aristotelian logical fallacy. A fallacy is an incorrect reasoning strategy that gives the illusion of being sound but somehow conceals an underlying problem. The underlying problem is that liars can sometimes tell the truth, and people who are presumed credible can sometimes lie. (from The Organon, Sophistical Refutations, published works of Aristotle/published by Andronicus of Rhodes 58 BC)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Wow, this is hysterical. Done in by his own documents.

Brett kavanaugh, aka Bart o'kavanaugh And his prolific poker is fffffinished. Not my words, but his.

Nope.
You folks have “screwed the pooch;” “overshot your wad;” “cried wolf one too many times.” Choose your idiom.

After all the false allegations of sexual assault and gang rape, then the allegations of being an alcoholic or someone with anger control issues, and the worst of all - he threw ice at someone in a bar - All the research you liberals and the media have done to find SOMETHING - ANYTHING to derail this nomination, we JUST AREN’T BUYING IT. The media are actively trying to track down something incriminating. I somehow think this was one of the reasons the Democrats were looking for a delay.
You are now trying to take a letter written by this man over 30 years ago, indicating he had a good sense of humor, was self-deprecating, and quite the planner and organizer, and making something of it because you will do “whatever it takes.”

Nope. Not buying it.

(PS Another allegation was sent to Chris Coons. Look for it. Then, look at Senator Grassley’s letter to Coons. This has become utterly ridiculous)

Flake isn't a Democrat. Neither are all if the GOP governors who've come out against Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it permitted to say that I think Ford is lying though her teeth? Not confused, not traumatized, not mixed up, just stone-cold lying.

But why on Earth would she do this! Did you see her? I'm dumbfounded at the cruelty people have directed at her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And, this might be one reason, among many others, that Swetnick is not seen as at all credible.........

From Senator Hatch’s Twitter feed:

A Utah man named Dennis Ketterer reached out to the Hatch office this week with information about accuser Julie Swetnick, and her allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

His full statement made under pentaly of felony to @senjudiciary can be found here --> https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/judiciary-committee-receives-statement-regarding-swetnick-allegations …

I know you think this is some sort of kill shot, but... so? Do you know what consent is? If she consented to have group sex, she gets to have group sex. If she did not consent to group sex, if she was drugged or was incapacitated with alcohol, it’s rape.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?

No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?

No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.

Please note where he said that. I heard him say that he did drink a lot--but he did not "blackout." You added the "choirboy" spin.

That is what is called "lying."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, this might be one reason, among many others, that Swetnick is not seen as at all credible.........

From Senator Hatch’s Twitter feed:

A Utah man named Dennis Ketterer reached out to the Hatch office this week with information about accuser Julie Swetnick, and her allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

His full statement made under pentaly of felony to @senjudiciary can be found here --> https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/judiciary-committee-receives-statement-regarding-swetnick-allegations …

I know you think this is some sort of kill shot, but... so? Do you know what consent is? If she consented to have group sex, she gets to have group sex. If she did not consent to group sex, if she was drugged or was incapacitated with alcohol, it’s rape.

Face it. This woman is a loon. She changed her story in her interview last night. Her “corroborating witnesses” are non-existent.
Avenatti should drop her and work on his run for president. Maybe he’ll have better luck with that endeavor. Doubtful, but you never know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?

No. I am sure that the artificial penis urologists constructed for him after I bit his off would allow him to sit through oral arguments without urinating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I asked this earlier but was never answered.

If someone were known to have shaken his naked penis in someone's face at a party when he was in his 20s, so close they had to touch it to get away from it, should that preclude them from the supreme court.

Put aside the partisan politics, and just answer without that. Is that disqualifying behavior?

No. Lying about it (and about excess drinking) should preclude them from the Supreme Court.

Best to admit that you were a drunk party bro and that is behind you. Not what Kavanaugh did. He acted like he was a choir boy who did nothing.

I believe in second chances. I believe that people can do horrible things and become better people. I also believe that becoming a better person starts with recognizing that you behaved badly, are honest about what you did, make amends, and then do better. I do not know if Kavanaugh is or isn't an alcoholic. What I do know is that he is not a person who holds himself accountable for his actions--he lies to cover them up and yells and screams if you bring them up. He is Bill Clinton and THAT is why he hated Clinton so much. That is why he went after him so hard. He knew he and Bill had a lot in common. Not all of the same sins but very similar.

[Anonymous]

Holy Smoke. Just read the beach rental letter. That has to be fake. Is it fake? "Bart"? "Welcomed with open _________"? FFFF. OMG. OMG. Where did they get this letter? Is it really from 1983?