Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Don't think he said that.......

He didn’t. More lies from the left.
I’m calling them Lefty Lies from now on.

You might want to take a look at the transcript again.

LEAHY: … Judge Kavanaugh, I’m trying to get a straight answer from you under oath. Are you Bart (ph) Kavanaugh that he’s referring to, yes or no? That’s it (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: You’d have to ask him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Don't think he said that.......

He didn’t. More lies from the left.
I’m calling them Lefty Lies from now on.

Prolific pukers? Not Saint BART! Oops, I mean Brett. And there’s that’s FFFFFFF. Again. Just more Squi stuttering.

Twitter:
Charles Lane
?
@ChuckLane1
Follow Follow @ChuckLane1
More
Since it's come up -- I grew up across the street in Chevy Chase from the guy known as "Squi" and saw him every day in my childhood. He did not stutter, so nothing to mock in that dept. but he did have that funny way of saying the F-word, as BK said. FWIW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump basically just declare a war on women? My head is about to explode!

You know who doesn’t care about the good of the country: KAVANAUGH. I don’t care about the charges (though I care that he lied about his yearbook), but if he wasn’t partisan - wouldn’t he step down and stay in his already cushy job. But, he’s in if for himself and he says that he supports this raging partisan battle.

It’s unbelievable that the left feels intimidation is a legitimate political tactic and not an immoral and disgusting technique reserved for dictators, banana republics, and the mob.

What is unbelievable is that Trump is daring women like you not to vote for him, by saying shitty things, and you do nevertheless.

I’ve voted Democrat all my life, but after this unbelievable farce which appears to be the last gasp of desperation of an already lost party I think I will probably vote red in November. Mostly because the democratic message isn’t about Helping workers, promoting American liberty or world peace. It’s about hating trump because he doesn’t speak politely. There is no message for the Democrats and it’s an embarrassment.

You're embarrassed by the Dems having no message, so you prefer Trump?

Good riddance.

This post is a good candidate for deletion from the forum. Hard to believe it's real

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Don't think he said that.......

He didn’t. More lies from the left.
I’m calling them Lefty Lies from now on.

You might want to take a look at the transcript again.

LEAHY: … Judge Kavanaugh, I’m trying to get a straight answer from you under oath. Are you Bart (ph) Kavanaugh that he’s referring to, yes or no? That’s it (ph)…

KAVANAUGH: You’d have to ask him.

And, you call that a lie? It is no wonder you people are spinning your wheels.
Your heads are simply going to explode when he is confirmed.
Your “proof” here is ridiculous. Now, finally, now, I see why you “believe her” despite evidence - if you think this is Kavanaugh lying.
#LeftyLies

[Anonymous]

Well now that we know that Brett called himself "Bart" I'm going to re-post the link to this law school admissions message board where someone with the name "Bart O'Kavanaugh" was posting about giving his girlfriend a wine enema (ie: "boofing") in 2012. Its got to be either him or Mark Judge right? Does anyone know how long that poster had been around?

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2005720&mc=3&forum_id=2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Wow, this is hysterical. Done in by his own documents.

Brett kavanaugh, aka Bart o'kavanaugh And his prolific poker is fffffinished. Not my words, but his.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well now that we know that Brett called himself "Bart" I'm going to re-post the link to this law school admissions message board where someone with the name "Bart O'Kavanaugh" was posting about giving his girlfriend a wine enema (ie: "boofing") in 2012. Its got to be either him or Mark Judge right? Does anyone know how long that poster had been around?

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2005720&mc=3&forum_id=2

OMG. Bart self-boofed! Somebody forward this to Mitch McConnell for comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Wow, this is hysterical. Done in by his own documents.

Brett kavanaugh, aka Bart o'kavanaugh And his prolific poker is fffffinished. Not my words, but his.

That says Prolific Pukers.... ya know, they have weak stomachs...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NEW EVIDENCE. New witness comes forward to corroborate Julie Swetnick!!

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-10-02%20Signed%20Ketterer%20Statement%20-%20Swetnick%20Allegations.pdf

You’re joking, right, pp?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted this near the end of thread 3. I’m curious what Kavanaugh supporters think, particularly of the last paragraph.

“I honestly don’t know who is telling the truth. I don’t believe her blindly, but I also don’t think she’s involved in some big conspiracy (even if one is happening around her.) And certainly some people screwed the pooch procedurally here.

All that said, his behavior on Thursday was absolutely horrific and completely unbecoming of a Supreme Court Justice. He is hot tempered and blatantly partisan. Yes, lots of people in the room were being partisan, but he was the only one trying to become a Supreme Court Justice.”

As I’ve said before, if he had been polite and answered the questions cordially and directly, this would all be over. He has humiliated himself and shown he can’t remain calm and impartial in tense situations.”

Up until this morning I felt the same way as you, I didn't necessarily know who was telling the truth. After the Rachel Mitchell memo I am inclined to believe BK. there are too many loopholes in her story some of which make me think she is intentionally being dishonest. That being said I think his explanations of the meanings of his yearbook statements amounts to perjury and he probably did himself in on that alone. However, I do not believe he assaulted Christine Ford.

The Rachel Mitchell memo is insignificant. You are falling for political BS. She is saying she doesn't have the evidence to take it to court. And how would she? She was not even permitted to have an interview with Kavanaugh? do you know how many cases where there IS evidence that the prosecutor refuses to take to court? The only take things where they are pretty sure they will get a conviction.

She never ever ever says that she thinks he is innocent.

You should read this article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/opinions/arlington-texas/?utm_term=.5ba1f80d92bc

Most sexual assaults are not reported. The ones that are mostly NEVER go to trial. It DOES NOT MEAN THEY DID NOT HAPPEN.

In this case, he could have done it. He should not be on the SC if he could have done it. We don't give positions to people who could have done it. Would you hire a tutor who MAYBE slept with his/her last student? Would you hire a housekeeper who MAYBE stole jewelry from her last employer?

NO YOU WOULD NOT.

And, to the poster who wanted to know why the future is scary for young men.....

Read the bolded paragraph above. It is all about IF. If he could have done it. If he is guilty. If, If, If.....
Despite the fact that the only 3 people who were reportedly there have failed to corroborate her claims, and her dear friend doesn’t even know Kavanaugh.....he should be subject to penalty because.... IF.
This is why young men should be scared. Because, all it takes is an allegation.

Enough with all young men being scared. All men don't have to be scared. The people who are scared are the men who behaved like they were in Animal House when they were younger. Too drunk to control themselves. Mistreated women. Any guy who acted like the stuff they are saying BK did is getting nervous? Fine with me.

Women and POC have been scared for years...decades...centuries, putting up with men who mistreat them for their own amusement and having little to NO recourse.

So pardon me while I don't cry a river for some white dude who acted like an ass in his teens and twenties having a moment of fear about what he might have done.

I have a father, brothers, male cousins, sons that I love. I'm not worried for them. They don't act like assholes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Wow, this is hysterical. Done in by his own documents.

Brett kavanaugh, aka Bart o'kavanaugh And his prolific poker is fffffinished. Not my words, but his.

That says Prolific Pukers.... ya know, they have weak stomachs...

Oops! Well still, he likes to shake it in womens faces.

[Anonymous]

PredictIt is now saying that there’s only a 27% chance that Kav is not confirmed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well now that we know that Brett called himself "Bart" I'm going to re-post the link to this law school admissions message board where someone with the name "Bart O'Kavanaugh" was posting about giving his girlfriend a wine enema (ie: "boofing") in 2012. Its got to be either him or Mark Judge right? Does anyone know how long that poster had been around?

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2005720&mc=3&forum_id=2

In 2012,Brett Kavanaugh had been out of Law school for decades. And was married, with children. This seems like reaching

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well now that we know that Brett called himself "Bart" I'm going to re-post the link to this law school admissions message board where someone with the name "Bart O'Kavanaugh" was posting about giving his girlfriend a wine enema (ie: "boofing") in 2012. Its got to be either him or Mark Judge right? Does anyone know how long that poster had been around?

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2005720&mc=3&forum_id=2

In 2012,Brett Kavanaugh had been out of Law school for decades. And was married, with children. This seems like reaching

Because there are so many Bart Kavanaugh’s out there with a history of boofing. To be fair, it could be Mark Judge. Either way, it’s not good for Saint Bart, the virgin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PredictIt is now saying that there’s only a 27% chance that Kav is not confirmed.

That's about right. He has about 80% chance of getting confirmed assuming each undecided senator is 50/50 for voting yes.