
Anyone watching CNN non stop, as I am?
I'm starting to find it annoying, especially the unhelpful, awkward "reporting" by Martin Savidge and the flight instructor in Ontario. So cheesy and obvious filler. And, the repose who walks on the map? Unhelpful. Then, they'll trot out their staff meterologists to explain how radar works or what the weather is like in the search area. Please, more (retired RAF) pilot, Michael Kay. Yes, please! He's movie star handsome and actually makes sense. He can dive deep for my box. I'm sweating now and must get back to work. |
That's reporter who walks on the map |
This whole thing would be so much less of a frustrating cluster fuck for the entire world, and most importantly, for the families of the passengers on that plane, if anyone had any PR sense.
There should be ONE source that all of the information is released through. Instead, you hear a credible source saying, "Malaysia said blah, blah, blah" then the next thing you know Malaysia is quoted as saying, "We never said blah, blah, blah." I stopped closely following it a few days ago because there is so much information, and misinformation, coming from so many sources, that it has turned into a second disaster in itself, IMO. The reddit quote from earlier pretty much summed it up. |
Behold. He's hot.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-kay/ |
Wait did CNN actually mention a black hole theory?? WTF!! com'mon really.... |
Oh yes. Don Lemon is guilty as charged. He decided that he'd read tweets to empaneled experts and "threw that out there" about the black hole/worm hole. |
black hole = black eye for CNN
I bet terrorists are lounging in their Lazy-Boys laughing at all of us right now. |
+1. I seriously do not understand people who keep on harping about the depressurization theory or catastrophic error or fire. The plane changed courses multiple times! After the transponder was turned off! After the copilot said goodnight! If it was a hijacker, or fire, or loss of oxygen, THEY WOULD HAVE SIGNALED OR CALLED IN MAYDAY. It's like people are willfully blind to the fact that something nefarious happened. Wishing for the randomest of things to happen doesn't change what is clearly most likely the case at this point -- that it landed, safely, in western China or the Middle East. |
John Blaxland, senior fellow at Australian National University and an an expert on Australian radar, agreed. "I'm a little bit pessimistic," he told "New Day."
He said the debris might be one of the ubiquitous cargo containers carried by ships around the world. "It's not at all inconceivable that that's exactly what it is," he said, adding that other satellites have been steered to the area to get a better view. "The problem now is we don't know exactly where" it is, he said. And poor visibility has not helped. "It's still really hard, in this kind of environment, to pick out these little semi-submerged blips," he said. "You're looking for something that is potentially not even there any more." |
Or pilot suicide. Those are the only two theories that I think are plausible. |
In all matters of international espionage the one group I will pay attention to is the Israelis. The Israelis always know what is actually happening. So if the Israelis are actually beefing up security because of this then I don't believe the catastrophic failure theory. |
American news outlets seem to be reporting about Israel beefing up security, but I can't find any Israeli news outlets reporting on that. |
Or it could mean that the us govt knows that it's at the bottom of the Indian Ocean and no threat at all. Why waste money and security by sending in the fleet? |
It's a classic alien abduction coverup. |
![]() I'm not paying attention to this anymore! |