Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump basically just declare a war on women? My head is about to explode!

You know who doesn’t care about the good of the country: KAVANAUGH. I don’t care about the charges (though I care that he lied about his yearbook), but if he wasn’t partisan - wouldn’t he step down and stay in his already cushy job. But, he’s in if for himself and he says that he supports this raging partisan battle.

It’s unbelievable that the left feels intimidation is a legitimate political tactic and not an immoral and disgusting technique reserved for dictators, banana republics, and the mob.

What is unbelievable is that Trump is daring women like you not to vote for him, by saying shitty things, and you do nevertheless.

I’ve voted Democrat all my life, but after this unbelievable farce which appears to be the last gasp of desperation of an already lost party I think I will probably vote red in November. Mostly because the democratic message isn’t about Helping workers, promoting American liberty or world peace. It’s about hating trump because he doesn’t speak politely. There is no message for the Democrats and it’s an embarrassment.

Oh look, the fake democrat troll is back with her walk away nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted this near the end of thread 3. I’m curious what Kavanaugh supporters think, particularly of the last paragraph.

“I honestly don’t know who is telling the truth. I don’t believe her blindly, but I also don’t think she’s involved in some big conspiracy (even if one is happening around her.) And certainly some people screwed the pooch procedurally here.

All that said, his behavior on Thursday was absolutely horrific and completely unbecoming of a Supreme Court Justice. He is hot tempered and blatantly partisan. Yes, lots of people in the room were being partisan, but he was the only one trying to become a Supreme Court Justice.”

As I’ve said before, if he had been polite and answered the questions cordially and directly, this would all be over. He has humiliated himself and shown he can’t remain calm and impartial in tense situations.”

Up until this morning I felt the same way as you, I didn't necessarily know who was telling the truth. After the Rachel Mitchell memo I am inclined to believe BK. there are too many loopholes in her story some of which make me think she is intentionally being dishonest. That being said I think his explanations of the meanings of his yearbook statements amounts to perjury and he probably did himself in on that alone. However, I do not believe he assaulted Christine Ford.

The Rachel Mitchell memo is insignificant. You are falling for political BS. She is saying she doesn't have the evidence to take it to court. And how would she? She was not even permitted to have an interview with Kavanaugh? do you know how many cases where there IS evidence that the prosecutor refuses to take to court? The only take things where they are pretty sure they will get a conviction.

She never ever ever says that she thinks he is innocent.

You should read this article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/opinions/arlington-texas/?utm_term=.5ba1f80d92bc

Most sexual assaults are not reported. The ones that are mostly NEVER go to trial. It DOES NOT MEAN THEY DID NOT HAPPEN.

In this case, he could have done it. He should not be on the SC if he could have done it. We don't give positions to people who could have done it. Would you hire a tutor who MAYBE slept with his/her last student? Would you hire a housekeeper who MAYBE stole jewelry from her last employer?

NO YOU WOULD NOT.

And, to the poster who wanted to know why the future is scary for young men.....

Read the bolded paragraph above. It is all about IF. If he could have done it. If he is guilty. If, If, If.....
Despite the fact that the only 3 people who were reportedly there have failed to corroborate her claims, and her dear friend doesn’t even know Kavanaugh.....he should be subject to penalty because.... IF.
This is why young men should be scared. Because, all it takes is an allegation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After Trumps statement today and his put down of the reporter (another woman) yday we are heading into Handmaid's Tale territory. Not funny but horrifying. Are they trying to bring it all back to the 1950s? Trump is psychotic

If you mean the 1950's of McCarthyism, then I agree with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump basically just declare a war on women? My head is about to explode!

You know who doesn’t care about the good of the country: KAVANAUGH. I don’t care about the charges (though I care that he lied about his yearbook), but if he wasn’t partisan - wouldn’t he step down and stay in his already cushy job. But, he’s in if for himself and he says that he supports this raging partisan battle.

It’s unbelievable that the left feels intimidation is a legitimate political tactic and not an immoral and disgusting technique reserved for dictators, banana republics, and the mob.

What is unbelievable is that Trump is daring women like you not to vote for him, by saying shitty things, and you do nevertheless.

I’ve voted Democrat all my life, but after this unbelievable farce which appears to be the last gasp of desperation of an already lost party I think I will probably vote red in November. Mostly because the democratic message isn’t about Helping workers, promoting American liberty or world peace. It’s about hating trump because he doesn’t speak politely. There is no message for the Democrats and it’s an embarrassment.

Oh look, the fake democrat troll is back with her walk away nonsense.

I always get a laugh from idiots who accuse people of being "fake Democrats" if they say they're never voting Democrat again. To the PP: maybe get out of your bubble just a tad? There are many of us who have had it with what the moronic Democratic party has become.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“My whole life, I've heard you're innocent until proven guilty. But now you're guilty until proven innocent....I say that it's a very scary time for young men in America"

-Donald J Trump ( the guy who still encourages chants of lock her up, who still thinks the Central Park 5 are guilty, and who insisted Obama was a fake American)

Why is it scary just for young men?

Because it has been the system for minorities and women and now it is being applied to white men and he wants to get angry white guys to the polls. You know the fathers that describe their son's drunken sexual assault of a women behind a dumpster as "20 minutes of action." It's scary for those guys because they believe (whether they realize it or not) in a system that relegates that their daughters to second class citizenship. We'll believe you if you say someone stole your car, tv, or robbed you at gun point but if you say a clean cut looking white guy sexually assaulted or harassed you we will believe him until you can prove with physical or eye witness evidence that you are telling the truth. That's America folks.

What a cynical and totally false view of the world.

PP - this whole fiasco shows how scary it is for young men because it seems that we have moved the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused.
We have a man who has proclaimed his innocence and who has 3 people who were reportedly present fail to corroborate the claims, yet he is expected to prove he was never at a party the never happened. How in the hell is he supposed to do that? Particularly since he has not been given the supposed date, the supposed house, or many of the details of the supposed assault.
When our standards, as a country, expect an accused person to prove their innocence (and NOT the accused proving his guilt) based on the total lack of evidence and facts in this case, young men should be scared of what they might be accused of in the future.

There is sworn credible testimony that contradicts his sworn testimony. There is no other sworn testimony.

Is that your new line?
The statements submitted by the 3 people identified as being present at the alleged party are subject to the same laws of perjury as sworn testimony. But, you know that.
NOTHING Ford has provided, other than her account, has indicated guilt.

I know they are one page attorney drafted letters which says they don’t RECALL him acting like that. That is nothing close to sworn testimony.

[Anonymous]

Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Don't think he said that.......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump basically just declare a war on women? My head is about to explode!

You know who doesn’t care about the good of the country: KAVANAUGH. I don’t care about the charges (though I care that he lied about his yearbook), but if he wasn’t partisan - wouldn’t he step down and stay in his already cushy job. But, he’s in if for himself and he says that he supports this raging partisan battle.

It’s unbelievable that the left feels intimidation is a legitimate political tactic and not an immoral and disgusting technique reserved for dictators, banana republics, and the mob.

What is unbelievable is that Trump is daring women like you not to vote for him, by saying shitty things, and you do nevertheless.

I’ve voted Democrat all my life, but after this unbelievable farce which appears to be the last gasp of desperation of an already lost party I think I will probably vote red in November. Mostly because the democratic message isn’t about Helping workers, promoting American liberty or world peace. It’s about hating trump because he doesn’t speak politely. There is no message for the Democrats and it’s an embarrassment.

Oh look, the fake democrat troll is back with her walk away nonsense.

I always get a laugh from idiots who accuse people of being "fake Democrats" if they say they're never voting Democrat again. To the PP: maybe get out of your bubble just a tad? There are many of us who have had it with what the moronic Democratic party has become.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“My whole life, I've heard you're innocent until proven guilty. But now you're guilty until proven innocent....I say that it's a very scary time for young men in America"

-Donald J Trump ( the guy who still encourages chants of lock her up, who still thinks the Central Park 5 are guilty, and who insisted Obama was a fake American)

Why is it scary just for young men?

Because it has been the system for minorities and women and now it is being applied to white men and he wants to get angry white guys to the polls. You know the fathers that describe their son's drunken sexual assault of a women behind a dumpster as "20 minutes of action." It's scary for those guys because they believe (whether they realize it or not) in a system that relegates that their daughters to second class citizenship. We'll believe you if you say someone stole your car, tv, or robbed you at gun point but if you say a clean cut looking white guy sexually assaulted or harassed you we will believe him until you can prove with physical or eye witness evidence that you are telling the truth. That's America folks.

What a cynical and totally false view of the world.

PP - this whole fiasco shows how scary it is for young men because it seems that we have moved the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused.
We have a man who has proclaimed his innocence and who has 3 people who were reportedly present fail to corroborate the claims, yet he is expected to prove he was never at a party the never happened. How in the hell is he supposed to do that? Particularly since he has not been given the supposed date, the supposed house, or many of the details of the supposed assault.
When our standards, as a country, expect an accused person to prove their innocence (and NOT the accused proving his guilt) based on the total lack of evidence and facts in this case, young men should be scared of what they might be accused of in the future.

There is sworn credible testimony that contradicts his sworn testimony. There is no other sworn testimony.

Is that your new line?
The statements submitted by the 3 people identified as being present at the alleged party are subject to the same laws of perjury as sworn testimony. But, you know that.
NOTHING Ford has provided, other than her account, has indicated guilt.

I know they are one page attorney drafted letters which says they don’t RECALL him acting like that. That is nothing close to sworn testimony.

You can think what you want. They are subject to the same laws of perjury as sworn testimony. That is just fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Don't think he said that.......

He didn’t. More lies from the left.
I’m calling them Lefty Lies from now on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There will be two outcomes: 1) 80% chance Brett is confirmed, or 2) Republicans gains majority in the senate by ridding red-state democrats in the mid term. McConnell needs to wrap this up quickly. I prefer Kavanaugh is voted down by Manchin, Flake and Collins. It will be a sure thing for them to lose their next elections.

Sorry dear. Flake has no next election. Collins will meanwhile lose her election if she votes FOR BK and she knows it.

Sorry the math is against your wish. It comes down to Collins, MurKowski, Flake, Manchin, and Heitkamp. Kavanaugh only needs 2 out of 5. Collins' election is 2 years away. Flake has not switched party yet. He will most likely be confirmed.

I agree with the last poster

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Don't think he said that.......

He didn’t. More lies from the left.
I’m calling them Lefty Lies from now on.

Prolific pukers? Not Saint BART! Oops, I mean Brett. And there’s that’s FFFFFFF. Again. Just more Squi stuttering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And, this might be one reason, among many others, that Swetnick is not seen as at all credible.........

From Senator Hatch’s Twitter feed:

A Utah man named Dennis Ketterer reached out to the Hatch office this week with information about accuser Julie Swetnick, and her allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

His full statement made under pentaly of felony to @senjudiciary can be found here --> https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/judiciary-committee-receives-statement-regarding-swetnick-allegations …

Goodness gracious!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brett never heard of Bart. Nope never they called him that. Swore to Congress, he did. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as they say.

Wow, this is hysterical. Done in by his own documents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“My whole life, I've heard you're innocent until proven guilty. But now you're guilty until proven innocent....I say that it's a very scary time for young men in America"

-Donald J Trump ( the guy who still encourages chants of lock her up, who still thinks the Central Park 5 are guilty, and who insisted Obama was a fake American)

Why is it scary just for young men?

Because it has been the system for minorities and women and now it is being applied to white men and he wants to get angry white guys to the polls. You know the fathers that describe their son's drunken sexual assault of a women behind a dumpster as "20 minutes of action." It's scary for those guys because they believe (whether they realize it or not) in a system that relegates that their daughters to second class citizenship. We'll believe you if you say someone stole your car, tv, or robbed you at gun point but if you say a clean cut looking white guy sexually assaulted or harassed you we will believe him until you can prove with physical or eye witness evidence that you are telling the truth. That's America folks.

What a cynical and totally false view of the world.

PP - this whole fiasco shows how scary it is for young men because it seems that we have moved the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused.
We have a man who has proclaimed his innocence and who has 3 people who were reportedly present fail to corroborate the claims, yet he is expected to prove he was never at a party the never happened. How in the hell is he supposed to do that? Particularly since he has not been given the supposed date, the supposed house, or many of the details of the supposed assault.
When our standards, as a country, expect an accused person to prove their innocence (and NOT the accused proving his guilt) based on the total lack of evidence and facts in this case, young men should be scared of what they might be accused of in the future.

There is sworn credible testimony that contradicts his sworn testimony. There is no other sworn testimony.

Is that your new line?
The statements submitted by the 3 people identified as being present at the alleged party are subject to the same laws of perjury as sworn testimony. But, you know that.
NOTHING Ford has provided, other than her account, has indicated guilt.

I know they are one page attorney drafted letters which says they don’t RECALL him acting like that. That is nothing close to sworn testimony.

You can think what you want. They are subject to the same laws of perjury as sworn testimony. That is just fact.

They are carefully parsed to not say anything of significance and vague enough to never be actionable. Unless a person is questioned under oath, it is not the equivalent of sworn testimony. Even an affidavit is a step below because the witness is not subject to questioning.