US Supreme Court Rules Against Affirmative Action in College Admissions

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding that GPA and test scores TOGETHER are both equally indicative of student performance. In other words, students with excellent grades can often have good SAT scores.

However, the reverse is not true. Students with low GPAs can achieve excellent SAT scores through tutoring. This second scenario is not indicative of a good student. Just a good test taker who may have the money to “buy” their score.

In the end, GPA and rigor are king and this is why we are moving test optional… to level the playing field


You don't understand.
Rich people can hire tutors and afford to take shit ton of APs and college level math such as multi-variable calculus, differntial equations advance statistics, etc.
This boost their rigor points and weight GPA.

SAT is at least cover just the fundamental level that low income smart kids can compete.
There are really good free resources if you have smart and will.


grade inflation means GPA scores are meaningless.

Money can buy great extra curriculars.

At least SATs and APs are standard across the board. No grade inflation. You can get free test prep online at Khan (my kid used it) or at the library, and some schools even offer free test prep.


ok, SAT and AP exams are not free, so still advantage for kids that can afford multiple SAT takes and loads of AP exams
AP classes not available at all schools
some schools offering free SAT prep and exams while others do not ... not ok

It's free for MCPS students, and as well as AP exam fees waived. If you want all low income kids to be able to take these tests, then we should make that a national waiver, which I 100% support.

But, getting rid of standardized exams is not the answer to level the playing field across ALL students from around the country.

Then we need to improve our public education system along with expanding the school day to about 10-12 hours/day. Because what you’re suggesting above is still not equal for everyone.
Anonymous
f you have to ask that question, then you really need some American history lessons. Go read some books on Black history. Look at how the jail system was created to house Black males. Look at the 0% proficiency in math and science in Baltimore schools. Look at my parents and everyone in their generation who were denied housing, jobs, credit and in many cases dignity. Look at the Lynch papers - look at the people in charge through the years to followed very specific requirements to ensure Black people did not advance. And then look at Black immigrants from anywhere in the World and how they come here and excel. Being born Black in American is more than a barrier. The Black person has to shift their entire life trajectory to overcome systems put in place to keep them down. Asians and immigrants have created their own systems to ensure they can "beat the system" in place. These same systems are not possible for many in the Black community who are struggling with systems that keep them down. You really need to read more about history.


okay, I don't think the jail system was designed to house black males, though that is what happened. The first prison was designed in Philadelphia and housed mostly poor white people. it was considered to be a improvement, a place where people could repent their crimes and emerge ready to rejoin society. Visit the museum in Philly. It is really interesting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Which "certain" groups score lower than others? Why "certain"?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding that GPA and test scores TOGETHER are both equally indicative of student performance. In other words, students with excellent grades can often have good SAT scores.

However, the reverse is not true. Students with lowGPAs can achieve excellent SAT scores through tutoring. This second scenario is not indicative of a good student. Just a good test taker who may have the money to “buy” their score.

In the end, GPA and rigor are king and this is why we are moving test optional… to level the playing field


You don't understand.
Rich people can hire tutors and afford to take shit ton of APs and college level math such as multi-variable calculus, differntial equations advance statistics, etc.
This boost their rigor points and weight GPA.

SAT is at least cover just the fundamental level that low income smart kids can compete.
There are really good free resources if you have smart and will.


grade inflation means GPA scores are meaningless.

Money can buy great extra curriculars.

At least SATs and APs are standard across the board. No grade inflation. You can get free test prep online at Khan (my kid used it) or at the library, and some schools even offer free test prep.


The SAT as mandatory train left the station years ago. Sorry.

Keep up with the trends. "MIT" isn't it.

HYPS, Columbia, etc. Is.

The "trend" is to increase diversity. And since certain groups score lower than others, and it was pretty obvious, they did away with it.

Keep up.


Probably due to the large IQ differences from a previous post. Blacks in the US have an average IQ of 83; Asians in the US have an average IQ of 108. To think that groups with such large differences in average IQ should have even remotely similar representation at top colleges is absurd.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which "certain" groups score lower than others? Why "certain"?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding that GPA and test scores TOGETHER are both equally indicative of student performance. In other words, students with excellent grades can often have good SAT scores.

However, the reverse is not true. Students with lowGPAs can achieve excellent SAT scores through tutoring. This second scenario is not indicative of a good student. Just a good test taker who may have the money to “buy” their score.

In the end, GPA and rigor are king and this is why we are moving test optional… to level the playing field


You don't understand.
Rich people can hire tutors and afford to take shit ton of APs and college level math such as multi-variable calculus, differntial equations advance statistics, etc.
This boost their rigor points and weight GPA.

SAT is at least cover just the fundamental level that low income smart kids can compete.
There are really good free resources if you have smart and will.


grade inflation means GPA scores are meaningless.

Money can buy great extra curriculars.

At least SATs and APs are standard across the board. No grade inflation. You can get free test prep online at Khan (my kid used it) or at the library, and some schools even offer free test prep.


The SAT as mandatory train left the station years ago. Sorry.

Keep up with the trends. "MIT" isn't it.

HYPS, Columbia, etc. Is.

The "trend" is to increase diversity. And since certain groups score lower than others, and it was pretty obvious, they did away with it.

Keep up.


Probably due to the large IQ differences from a previous post. Blacks in the US have an average IQ of 83; Asians in the US have an average IQ of 108. To think that groups with such large differences in average IQ should have even remotely similar representation at top colleges is absurd.


Averages are useless in this conversation unless we use the average of the top 1%.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Asians get higher scores on activities, leadership, interview


they do work harder as parents push harder but they start with significant advantage, most of them have parents with higher education that came here with scholarships for graduate school or postdoc jobs, no debt as undergrad is free in their home country, then continue to stay here and get good positions in academia or research labs, then help their kids to get internships and jobs through their connections and so on

the ones that came poor with little education have little upward mobility, so do not generalize


LOL No, you seem to have some sort of fantasy about Asians, but it's not like that.
What you just described are actually wealthy White ALDC folks.

Just 50-70 years ago, Asian countries like Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and China were all in ruins, and they were among the poorest countries, even poorer than some African nations. Most Asian immigrants didn't have any luxuries in the end. If they had anything, it was due to hard work and sacrifices, as well as their value for education. For those who come here after college from their home countries, they face significant language, social, and cultural barriers.

However, they manage to achieve middle-class status by the second or third generation through their dedication to education.
It's important to move away from a victim mentality in order to make progress.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding that GPA and test scores TOGETHER are both equally indicative of student performance. In other words, students with excellent grades can often have good SAT scores.

However, the reverse is not true. Students with low GPAs can achieve excellent SAT scores through tutoring. This second scenario is not indicative of a good student. Just a good test taker who may have the money to “buy” their score.

In the end, GPA and rigor are king and this is why we are moving test optional… to level the playing field


You don't understand.
Rich people can hire tutors and afford to take shit ton of APs and college level math such as multi-variable calculus, differntial equations advance statistics, etc.
This boost their rigor points and weight GPA.

SAT is at least cover just the fundamental level that low income smart kids can compete.
There are really good free resources if you have smart and will.


grade inflation means GPA scores are meaningless.

Money can buy great extra curriculars.

At least SATs and APs are standard across the board. No grade inflation. You can get free test prep online at Khan (my kid used it) or at the library, and some schools even offer free test prep.


ok, SAT and AP exams are not free, so still advantage for kids that can afford multiple SAT takes and loads of AP exams
AP classes not available at all schools
some schools offering free SAT prep and exams while others do not ... not ok

It's free for MCPS students, and as well as AP exam fees waived. If you want all low income kids to be able to take these tests, then we should make that a national waiver, which I 100% support.

But, getting rid of standardized exams is not the answer to level the playing field across ALL students from around the country.

Then we need to improve our public education system along with expanding the school day to about 10-12 hours/day. Because what you’re suggesting above is still not equal for everyone.


where did you get 10-12 hours?
Also it's not just amount of time.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Asians get higher scores on activities, leadership, interview


they do work harder as parents push harder but they start with significant advantage, most of them have parents with higher education that came here with scholarships for graduate school or postdoc jobs, no debt as undergrad is free in their home country, then continue to stay here and get good positions in academia or research labs, then help their kids to get internships and jobs through their connections and so on

the ones that came poor with little education have little upward mobility, so do not generalize


LOL No, you seem to have some sort of fantasy about Asians, but it's not like that.
What you just described are actually wealthy White ALDC folks.

Just 50-70 years ago, Asian countries like Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and China were all in ruins, and they were among the poorest countries, even poorer than some African nations. Most Asian immigrants didn't have any luxuries in the end. If they had anything, it was due to hard work and sacrifices, as well as their value for education. For those who come here after college from their home countries, they face significant language, social, and cultural barriers.

However, they manage to achieve middle-class status by the second or third generation through their dedication to education.
It's important to move away from a victim mentality in order to make progress.


How about Indian Americans? They have the same complexion as blacks. They do very well. So it's not the color of the skin that's holding down people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which "certain" groups score lower than others? Why "certain"?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding that GPA and test scores TOGETHER are both equally indicative of student performance. In other words, students with excellent grades can often have good SAT scores.

However, the reverse is not true. Students with lowGPAs can achieve excellent SAT scores through tutoring. This second scenario is not indicative of a good student. Just a good test taker who may have the money to “buy” their score.

In the end, GPA and rigor are king and this is why we are moving test optional… to level the playing field




You don't understand.
Rich people can hire tutors and afford to take shit ton of APs and college level math such as multi-variable calculus, differntial equations advance statistics, etc.
This boost their rigor points and weight GPA.

SAT is at least cover just the fundamental level that low income smart kids can compete.
There are really good free resources if you have smart and will.


grade inflation means GPA scores are meaningless.

Money can buy great extra curriculars.

At least SATs and APs are standard across the board. No grade inflation. You can get free test prep online at Khan (my kid used it) or at the library, and some schools even offer free test prep.


The SAT as mandatory train left the station years ago. Sorry.

Keep up with the trends. "MIT" isn't it.

HYPS, Columbia, etc. Is.

The "trend" is to increase diversity. And since certain groups score lower than others, and it was pretty obvious, they did away with it.

Keep up.


Probably due to the large IQ differences from a previous post. Blacks in the US have an average IQ of 83; Asians in the US have an average IQ of 108. To think that groups with such large differences in average IQ should have even remotely similar representation at top colleges is absurd.


The entire rubric behind gathering this data is absurd. Back in the 1970s we were tested for IQ in elementary school. I was called in to retake the exam - twice. Why? Because I scored over 130 and the administrators were certain something was wrong ( I am a black American) so I took it again. Same result.

Ever since then I have been aware of the fact that even when blacks perform well the results are challenged. My first score was literally tossed into a waste bin.

You can measure your peter against those results if you like. Doesn't trouble me at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:GOP Steve Miller sent a letter to Harvard Law:

You are hereby warned.
Any such regime—for example, relying on biography over qualifications—to
achieve desired racial outcomes is clearly illegal and unconstitutional, and you
will face legal repercussions accordingly.
We will ensure that every faculty member, staff member, student, and
applicant for admission can communicate with us about any efforts to use
underhanded race, national origin, and sex preferences, and we will use any
information obtained to ensure accountability.
America First Legal is a charitable nonprofit and civil rights organization that
provides free legal services to victims of unlawful discrimination. We will
represent victims of these policies and sue any law school that allows these
illegal and discriminatory practices to continue.

Sincerely,
Stephen Miller
President
America First

Amen


Ah yes Stephen Miller, the known xenophobic pig behind the Muslim ban. He's only concerned about white and Asian people lol.

Could you kill the fake Christianity already? Saying amen to someone like this because he agrees with you on something is just blasphemous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding that GPA and test scores TOGETHER are both equally indicative of student performance. In other words, students with excellent grades can often have good SAT scores.

However, the reverse is not true. Students with lowGPAs can achieve excellent SAT scores through tutoring. This second scenario is not indicative of a good student. Just a good test taker who may have the money to “buy” their score.

In the end, GPA and rigor are king and this is why we are moving test optional… to level the playing field


You don't understand.
Rich people can hire tutors and afford to take shit ton of APs and college level math such as multi-variable calculus, differntial equations advance statistics, etc.
This boost their rigor points and weight GPA.

SAT is at least cover just the fundamental level that low income smart kids can compete.
There are really good free resources if you have smart and will.


grade inflation means GPA scores are meaningless.

Money can buy great extra curriculars.

At least SATs and APs are standard across the board. No grade inflation. You can get free test prep online at Khan (my kid used it) or at the library, and some schools even offer free test prep.


The SAT as mandatory train left the station years ago. Sorry.

Keep up with the trends. "MIT" isn't it.

HYPS, Columbia, etc. Is.

The "trend" is to increase diversity. And since certain groups score lower than others, and it was pretty obvious, they did away with it.

Keep up.


So....regardless of the SCOTUS ruling, the elite colleges still want URM diversity and will use other means like test optional to achieve it via having a wider selection pool (and maintain ALDC options).

You DO get it.

Now you can stop crying about standardized testing going back to the way it used to be.

That's not happening.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:An aspect of the US Supreme court case involving Harvard University and affirmative action is that the litigants want to be admitted to a school for the best and most prestigious educational experience in the world, yet they want to change how that educational institution does its business.

This is not a matter of exclusion--as in not admitting applicants of a certain race, religion, or ethnicity, etc.--this is a case about forcing the arguably best educational institution in the world how to do its business in creating such a superb educational experience. And, yes, I do understand that it was brought & decided based on the US Constitution's equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, but, in this matter, it seems to be an overreach by the court. If, for example, we focus on Asian representation in the student body at Harvard College, Asians comprise about 6.3% of the US population, but are about 38% of the most recent entering class at Harvard--which does not appear to be a case of insidious discrimination when it is in fact a case of over-representation. And Harvard's admission policies do not constitute fraud, as Harvard is upfront that standardized test scores and GPAs are not the only factors considered in the admissions process. And class valedictorians and salutorians of many different races , religions, and ethnic backgrounds are denied admission to Harvard each and every year.

When Harvard was actively discriminating against Jews it was still considered "the best institution in the world". At the time, the Jewish population at Harvard was reaching 20% and climbing, while their overall population was like 2% or something. So, would you say it was fine that Harvard discriminated against Jews back then?

If not, then why is it ok for them to discriminate against Asian Americans in the exact same way that they discriminated against Jews?


There’s a very obvious difference: one policy was explicitly to keep a particular type of person out, and another is there to ensure no race is excluded from the cohort and will favor or hurt whichever race is over represented in the applicant pool, therefore, it is race blind.

I don’t know why it’s so hard to see that. One policy is racist and one is not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which "certain" groups score lower than others? Why "certain"?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is my understanding that GPA and test scores TOGETHER are both equally indicative of student performance. In other words, students with excellent grades can often have good SAT scores.

However, the reverse is not true. Students with lowGPAs can achieve excellent SAT scores through tutoring. This second scenario is not indicative of a good student. Just a good test taker who may have the money to “buy” their score.

In the end, GPA and rigor are king and this is why we are moving test optional… to level the playing field




You don't understand.
Rich people can hire tutors and afford to take shit ton of APs and college level math such as multi-variable calculus, differntial equations advance statistics, etc.
This boost their rigor points and weight GPA.

SAT is at least cover just the fundamental level that low income smart kids can compete.
There are really good free resources if you have smart and will.


grade inflation means GPA scores are meaningless.

Money can buy great extra curriculars.

At least SATs and APs are standard across the board. No grade inflation. You can get free test prep online at Khan (my kid used it) or at the library, and some schools even offer free test prep.


The SAT as mandatory train left the station years ago. Sorry.

Keep up with the trends. "MIT" isn't it.

HYPS, Columbia, etc. Is.

The "trend" is to increase diversity. And since certain groups score lower than others, and it was pretty obvious, they did away with it.

Keep up.


Probably due to the large IQ differences from a previous post. Blacks in the US have an average IQ of 83; Asians in the US have an average IQ of 108. To think that groups with such large differences in average IQ should have even remotely similar representation at top colleges is absurd.


The entire rubric behind gathering this data is absurd. Back in the 1970s we were tested for IQ in elementary school. I was called in to retake the exam - twice. Why? Because I scored over 130 and the administrators were certain something was wrong ( I am a black American) so I took it again. Same result.

Ever since then I have been aware of the fact that even when blacks perform well the results are challenged. My first score was literally tossed into a waste bin.

You can measure your peter against those results if you like. Doesn't trouble me at all.


Yes, it’s all a conspiracy. The entirety of social scientists are in on it. You’ve figured it all out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Asians get higher scores on activities, leadership, interview


they do work harder as parents push harder but they start with significant advantage, most of them have parents with higher education that came here with scholarships for graduate school or postdoc jobs, no debt as undergrad is free in their home country, then continue to stay here and get good positions in academia or research labs, then help their kids to get internships and jobs through their connections and so on

the ones that came poor with little education have little upward mobility, so do not generalize


LOL No, you seem to have some sort of fantasy about Asians, but it's not like that.
What you just described are actually wealthy White ALDC folks.

Just 50-70 years ago, Asian countries like Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and China were all in ruins, and they were among the poorest countries, even poorer than some African nations. Most Asian immigrants didn't have any luxuries in the end. If they had anything, it was due to hard work and sacrifices, as well as their value for education. For those who come here after college from their home countries, they face significant language, social, and cultural barriers.

However, they manage to achieve middle-class status by the second or third generation through their dedication to education.
It's important to move away from a victim mentality in order to make progress.


no, it's pretty accurate for those that came here after college in the early 2000s and now have college-bound kids, the language barrier is only in spoken not in written, they are pretty fluent in English because only those fluent in English get acceptance into the doctoral programs, unless they lie about it and cheat on exams, and regarding social and cultural, they have the largest communities with programs and services in their language, much more that immigrants of european descent
Anonymous
I think it’s fairly likely more descendants of slaves will be admitted because they will be relying on SES more (and currently among Black admits children of immigrants are over-represented vs their percent of the population.)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Asians get higher scores on activities, leadership, interview


they do work harder as parents push harder but they start with significant advantage, most of them have parents with higher education that came here with scholarships for graduate school or postdoc jobs, no debt as undergrad is free in their home country, then continue to stay here and get good positions in academia or research labs, then help their kids to get internships and jobs through their connections and so on

the ones that came poor with little education have little upward mobility, so do not generalize


LOL No, you seem to have some sort of fantasy about Asians, but it's not like that.
What you just described are actually wealthy White ALDC folks.

Just 50-70 years ago, Asian countries like Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and China were all in ruins, and they were among the poorest countries, even poorer than some African nations. Most Asian immigrants didn't have any luxuries in the end. If they had anything, it was due to hard work and sacrifices, as well as their value for education. For those who come here after college from their home countries, they face significant language, social, and cultural barriers.

However, they manage to achieve middle-class status by the second or third generation through their dedication to education.
It's important to move away from a victim mentality in order to make progress.


no, it's pretty accurate for those that came here after college in the early 2000s and now have college-bound kids, the language barrier is only in spoken not in written, they are pretty fluent in English because only those fluent in English get acceptance into the doctoral programs, unless they lie about it and cheat on exams, and regarding social and cultural, they have the largest communities with programs and services in their language, much more that immigrants of european descent


Yes, keep blaming slavery.
More education and success for Asians.
Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Go to: