
They didn't say that. Why are you lying? They said it's up to each State. You vote for law makers in your state. |
It’s up to each state to determine in women have bodily autonomy? That’s the same as saying they don’t definitely have bodily autonomy. |
It's up to each state to have related laws. If your state says abortion is ok into 5th moths of pregnancy, the Fed can't say anything. If the people of your State want that, they can have it. Vote for it. |
Ok, if systemic racism exists, what are you doing in schools to counter the effects of it? In many situations Dems run the state, city, & school boards. Tell me what you are doing to help the kids thrive in the face of this systemic racism. You won’t answer the question, so let me help: accuse math of being racist. Now it’s your turn. |
Agree, but when a college uses artificial "likeability" metrics to put a thumb on the scale for lower scoring URM, that is discrimination. |
Please describe how any college can reject any student without engaging in discrimination. |
If you weren't aware, we are talking about racial discrimination in this tread. It's kind of given, so I didn't bother to spell it out. |
You are very confused. Asian Americans are not over represented based on the number of applicants. It doesn't matter how many Asian Americans there are in the general population since the general population isn't applying to Harvard. The Harvard case showed that Asian American applicants scored high in every measurable metric, except the "likeability" metric, which is highly subjective, and not only that, the AOs never even met the applicant, but scored them low. Whereas, the interviewer who did meet the applicant, scored them as likeable. IMO, that was the gotcha in the case. Data analysis is very important, but clearly, many progressives have issues with it. |
I am pretty sure AAs don't have a monopoly on life's miseries. Everyone - including American Indians, SE Asians, and Europeans - has a story to tell. That's why we have applications asking for details. |
So now people have to be grouped by race and admitted in proportion to the number of applications submitted by members of their racial group? That seems inconsistent with the rule that they have to be considered as individuals. |
I believe AOs were honestly doing their job, and gave higher scores to Asians for all those metric. It's at the higher level Admission's Committee that discriminated Asians. |
The case was not about "bodily autonomy". It's about federalism and the proper role of the feds vs. the states. Conservatives believe that the feds should not be running everything - many issues should be handled by the states. That's also what the founding fathers wanted: a small federal government to handle only those issues that the states cannot, as in taxation, stamping, and the military. They are also against an imperial presidency. Abortion was never a federal issue. Now it's being properly handled back to the states, which are closer to the people and better situated to address such issues And if you don't like the state's decision, you vote the lawmakers out. That is all. |
Notice the lack of response to the request for what Dem politicians & educators are actually doing to ensure kids prosper despite all this systemic racism from Republicans they never get within 5 miles of.
The whole education pipeline for these kids (kindergarten through grad school) is Democrat-controlled. If educators/politicians fix anything they won’t be able to brow-beat public & private sector leaders into giving them more money (which never seems to improve anything) or promise to fix the problem every 4 years (which they never do). Thousands of woke Education professors publish thousands of journal articles on how to fix things, but nothing gets improved. Nope, the school administrators’ & unions’ jobs are done once they blame the problem on racist Republicans & racist math. |
No you idiot. It means that the original Roe decision which miraculously found a right to privacy and hence the right to abortion in the Constitution was decided wrongly and it was finally overruled as it should have been long time ago. There is no such "right" in the Constitution. That is the honest truth, unless you want to gaslight everybody who disagrees with you by calling them a misogynist So now people who want abortion have two choices 1) Pass a federal law giving women that right 2) Get any state to pass such a law or enshrine it in that state's constitution For either of these, you have to make your case and win hearts and minds Liberals are just pissed because they don't want to do the hard work and would rather the court find such a right in the constitution, so as to make it easy on them. Roe WAS WRONG NO MATTER WHAT YOUR TAKE ON RIGHT TO ABORTION IS. It should be in the dust heap of history. Even RBG, a life long liberal thought Roe was on shaky constitutional grounds. |
You lost everyone and your argument at "idiot". |